Search
Full Library 1,859 resources
-
Over the last decade, the peace sector has been developing and adapting Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) systems and tools to fit their contexts and ways of working. This evolution may hold some insights for the aid community in how to go beyond more traditional, backwards-looking M&E to navigate today’s volatile, interest-based world of politics and aid.
-
Research on the Information Society, the Digital Divide and Information and Communication Technologies for development
-
This is a series about Monitoring, Evaluating and Learning (MEL) whether sets of interventions/portfolios are adding more together than each one would produce on their own. In post 1, I pointed to coherence, the new OECD-DAC evaluation criteria as a way to bridge the ambition of bringing bigger change with the MEL world. In post 2, I shared 3 of 4 practical lessons I’ve learned in experimenting with MEL systems and exercises that focus explicitly on interactions of...
-
This is a series about Monitoring, Evaluating and Learning (MEL) whether sets of interventions/portfolios are adding more together than each one would produce on their own. In post 1, I pointed to coherence, the new OECD-DAC evaluation criteria as a way to bridge the ambition of bringing bigger change with the MEL world. In post 2, I shared 3 of 4 practical lessons I’ve learned in experimenting with MEL systems and exercises that focus explicitly on interactions of...
-
This is a series about Monitoring, Evaluating and Learning (MEL) whether sets of interventions/portfolios are adding more together than each one would produce on their own. In post 1, I pointed to coherence, the new OECD-DAC evaluation criteria as a way to bridge the ambition of bringing bigger change with the MEL world. In post 2, I shared 3 of 4 practical lessons I’ve learned in experimenting with MEL systems and exercises that focus explicitly on interactions of...
-
Generic, analytic, holistic, orbic, asterisc, escalieric, cephalopodic
-
This article offers initial insights into the overlap, positioning, shared values, and convergences between RenDanHeYi compared to agile practices.
-
Programmes that aim to tackle complex societal issues, such as the worst forms of child labour, require rich partnerships that bring together different perspectives. CLARISSA’s consortium partnership adopts an empowerment approach to the interventions we deliver and our ways of working together. Part of this approach involves ongoing reflection and learning about how we work together in our partnership, and how this can be adapted if needed. This learning note focuses on a method used in...
-
There are a number of options when it comes to using software to help create a logic model. These range from generic word processing tools (Word, Powerpoint, or their Google Doc or Mac equivalents), to software that has been specifically tailored for visualising Theories of Change, like TOCO or Miradi. You should consider what resources you have to invest in software, both in terms of cost and in time to learn and use the features. If you only have a short timeframe and have simple needs,...
-
DT Global is proud to introduce our new Guidance Note: Practical Introduction to Adaptive Management There is a growing consensus around adaptive management as an effective (even necessary) approach when programs are tackling complex development problems. While there is no standard definition of adaptive management, there is general agreement that such programs need to routinely engage with and respond to program context; constantly test what works in that context; and adjust approaches,...
-
Many readers recognise and understand that complex is about as simple as it gets for major policy and management. This guide is for those unwilling in the Anthropocene to shrink back into the older platitudes about ‘keep it simple’ and ‘not to worry, we’ll scale up the analysis later on’. This guide offers key concepts, methods, counternarratives, and analogies that recast major policy and management issues in ways that do not deny their complexity but help render them more tractable for action.
-
A resource designed to help organisations, teams and individuals manage innovation journeys responsibly and successfully. We have partnered with MIT D-Lab to develop a new resource to drive greater diversity and inclusion within project design and implementation. The Participation for Humanitarian Innovation (PfHI) toolkit sets out a robust approach to setting expectations for and monitoring the degree of participation within research and innovation projects for, with, and by people...
-
A resource designed to help organisations, teams and individuals manage innovation journeys responsibly and successfully. We have partnered with MIT D-Lab to develop a new resource to drive greater diversity and inclusion within project design and implementation. The Participation for Humanitarian Innovation (PfHI) toolkit sets out a robust approach to setting expectations for and monitoring the degree of participation within research and innovation projects for, with, and by people...
-
Addressing 21st century development challenges requires investments in innovation, including the use of new approaches and technologies. Currently, many development organisations prioritise investments in isolated innovation pilots that leverage a specific approach or technology rather than pursuing a strategic approach to expand the organisation’s toolbox with innovations that have proven their comparative advantage over what is currently used. This Working Paper addresses this challenge of...
-
How can donors and grantees work together to create effective monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) practices that drive field-wide transformation?
-
Achieving impact through research for development programmes (R4D) requires engagement with diverse stakeholders across the research, development and policy divides. Understanding how such programmes support the emergence of outcomes, therefore, requires a focus on the relational aspects of engagement and collaboration. Increasingly, evaluation of large research collaborations is employing social network analysis (SNA), making use of its relational view of causation. In this paper, we use...
-
Large publicly funded programmes of research continue to receive increased investment as interventions aiming to produce impact for the world’s poorest and most marginalized populations. At this intersection of research and development, research is expected to contribute to complex processes of societal change. Embracing a co-produced view of impact as emerging along uncertain causal pathways often without predefined outcomes calls for innovation in the use of complexity-aware approaches to...
-
The United Kingdom Research and Innovation (UKRI) Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) aimed to address global challenges to achieve the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals through 12 interdisciplinary research hubs. This research documents key lessons learned around working with Theory of Change (ToC) to guide Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) within these complex research for development hubs. Interviews and document reviews were conducted in ten of the research...
-
Research for development (R4D) funding is increasingly expected to demonstrate value for money (VfM). However, the dominance of positivist approaches to evaluating VfM, such as cost-benefit analysis, do not fully account for the complexity of R4D funds and risk undermining efforts to contribute to transformational development. This paper posits an alternative approach to evaluating VfM, using the UK’s Global Challenges Research Fund and the Newton Fund as case studies. Based on a...
Explore
Theme
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(873)
- Adaptive Learning (90)
- Adaptive Management (266)
- Adaptive Rigour (8)
- Agile & Lean approaches (103)
- Capacity WORKS (6)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (35)
- Design Thinking / HCD (98)
- Doing Development Differently (27)
- Global Delivery Initiative (3)
- Human Learning Systems (2)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (10)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (5)
- Other Adaptive approaches (23)
-
Other sectors
(43)
- Environmental (9)
- Logistics & Product Development (11)
- Military (7)
- Organizational Management (13)
- Phylosophical roots (3)
- Project management (2)
- Sport (1)
- Participation (6)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (31)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (26)
- Positive Deviance (12)
- Results Based Management (14)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (173)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (78)
- Cases (139)
- Courses (14)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(227)
- Adaptive Management orgs (1)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- Canada - GAC & IDRC (12)
- China (3)
- DCED - Donor Committee for Enterprise Development (14)
- DFAT (Australia) (14)
- EU (1)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (40)
- G7 (1)
- GIZ (Germany) (20)
- Hivos - Netherlands (2)
- IFAD (1)
- ILO (1)
- Irish Aid (4)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- New Zealand (1)
- NGO Perspectives (30)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (16)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (2)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (2)
- SDC - Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (22)
- SIDA - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (5)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (6)
- USAID - CLA (30)
- WFP (1)
- World Bank (17)
-
Geography
(132)
-
Africa
(77)
-
Central Africa
(7)
- Angola (1)
- Cameroon (2)
- Democratic Republic of the Congo (4)
-
Eastern Africa
(34)
- Ethiopia (1)
- Kenya (5)
- Malawi (3)
- Mozambique (8)
- Rwanda (3)
- Somalia (6)
- Somaliland (1)
- South Sudan (3)
- Tanzania (5)
- Uganda (5)
- Zambia (1)
- Zimbabwe (3)
-
Northern Africa
(2)
- Egypt (2)
-
Southern Africa
(5)
- Lesotho (1)
- South Africa (4)
- West Africa (47)
-
Central Africa
(7)
-
Americas
(12)
-
Central America
(5)
- Costa Rica (1)
- Ecuador (3)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (1)
- Mexico (3)
-
North America
(5)
- Canada (2)
- United States of America (4)
- South America (3)
-
Central America
(5)
-
Asia
(50)
-
Eastern Asia
(11)
- China (11)
-
South-eastern Asia
(17)
- Cambodia (3)
- Indonesia (4)
- Lao People's Democratic Republic (2)
- Myanmar (7)
- Philippines (2)
- Thailand (1)
- Timor Leste (1)
- Viet Nam (2)
-
Southern Asia
(20)
- Afghanistan (1)
- Bangladesh (11)
- India (1)
- Nepal (11)
- Pakistan (5)
-
Western Asia
(2)
- Israel (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Eastern Asia
(11)
-
Europe
(10)
-
Eastern Europe
(1)
- Ukraine (1)
-
Northern Europe
(2)
- United Kingdom (2)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
- Spain (1)
-
Western Europe
(6)
- France (1)
- Germany (3)
- Netherlands (1)
- Switzerland (1)
-
Eastern Europe
(1)
- Many geographies (3)
-
Oceania
(3)
- Australia and New Zealand (2)
- Melanesia (1)
-
Africa
(77)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(540)
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (8)
- Action Research (4)
- After Action Reviews (3)
- Appreciative Inquiry (6)
- Beneficiary Assessment/Engagement (9)
- Case Study (9)
- Causal Mechanisms (13)
- Circular charts applications (radar, pie, sunburst, spiderweb, orbic, etc) (7)
- Collaborative Outcome Mapping (6)
- Comparisons/Benchmarking (1)
- Context Monitoring (1)
- Contribution Analysis (12)
- Cost-Benefit Analysis (3)
- Cost-effectiveness analysis (1)
- Critical Systems Heuristics (7)
- Cross-sectional study (1)
- Data mining (1)
- Delphi Survey (1)
- Democratic Evaluation (3)
- Descriptive Statistics (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (2)
- Developmental Evaluation (14)
- Diaries (1)
- Empowerment Evaluation (5)
- Ethnography (5)
- Evaluability assessment (6)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (6)
- Ex-post Evaluation (4)
- Feedback Systems (4)
- Focus Group Discussions (3)
- Horizontal Evaluation (2)
- Impact evaluation (13)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (5)
- Indicator-based approaches (11)
- Innovation History (3)
- Innovation System Analysis (4)
- Institutional Histories (4)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (8)
- Logical Framework (15)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (12)
- MEL Bricolage (2)
- MEL in International Development (30)
- Most Significant Change (7)
- Narrative Based Approaches (2)
- Network Analysis (7)
- Objectives and options analysis (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (11)
- Outcome Mapping (30)
- Participatory Evaluation (17)
- Participatory Learning for Action/Participatory Rural Appraisal (3)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (4)
- Policy Scientific Approach (2)
- Political Economy Analysis (14)
- Political Sentiment Analysis (PSA) (1)
- Portfolio Management (16)
- Positive Deviance (7)
- Post Project Evaluations (1)
- Power Analysis (1)
- Principles-Focused Evaluation (1)
- Process Tracing (10)
- Public Management Theory (2)
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (8)
- Qualitative data analysis and grounded theory (2)
- Qualitative Impact Assessment Protocol (4)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (11)
- Rapid Action Learning (6)
- Realist Evaluation (10)
- Remote Monitoring (1)
- Rigour (3)
- Rubrics (12)
- Rules of Thumb (3)
- Scenario Planning (8)
- SenseMaker (9)
- Social Media Metrics (1)
- Social Return on Investment (4)
- Stakeholder analysis (3)
- Stakeholder Feedback (3)
- Strategy testing (2)
- Success Case Method (5)
- Surveys (4)
- Sustainability (3)
- SWOT Analysis (1)
- Systemic Action Research (3)
- Systemic Change (19)
- Systems Mapping (4)
- Tech 4 MEL (4)
- Theory-based evaluations (11)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (57)
- Trans-disciplinary Research (1)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (8)
- Value for Money (8)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (49)
- Organizations (3)
- Practical (110)
-
Sectors [+]
(597)
- Advocacy and Activism (2)
- Agriculture (2)
- Alternative Development (119)
- Cash Trasfers (1)
- Children (5)
- Citizen Engagement (63)
- Climate Change (5)
- Combatting violent extremism (6)
- Economic development (11)
- Education (4)
- Employment (1)
- Environmental Management (32)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (14)
- Gender (9)
- Governance and Accountability (156)
- Health (8)
- Humanitarian Aid (7)
- Inclusion/Disability (1)
- Innovation in Development (64)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (16)
- Institutional Reform (5)
- Judicial systems (3)
- Knowledge to Practice (32)
- Land Reform (1)
- Locally driven development (20)
- NGOs (28)
- Organizational Change (12)
- Pastoralism (1)
- Peace Building (12)
- Private Sector Development (1)
- Research for Development (R4D) (6)
- Social Accountability (132)
-
Tech in Development
(43)
- Appropriate Tech (6)
- Tools (23)
- Waste Management (1)
- Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) (1)
Resource type
- Blog Post (237)
- Book (214)
- Book Section (53)
- Conference Paper (30)
- Dataset (1)
- Document (15)
- Encyclopedia Article (1)
- Film (1)
- Forum Post (1)
- Journal Article (381)
- Magazine Article (23)
- Manuscript (1)
- Map (1)
- Newspaper Article (4)
- Podcast (1)
- Presentation (16)
- Radio Broadcast (1)
- Report (778)
- Software (2)
- Thesis (6)
- Video Recording (18)
- Web Page (74)
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(79)
-
Between 1940 and 1949
(1)
- 1948 (1)
- Between 1950 and 1959 (4)
- Between 1960 and 1969 (4)
- Between 1970 and 1979 (10)
- Between 1980 and 1989 (17)
- Between 1990 and 1999 (43)
-
Between 1940 and 1949
(1)
-
Between 2000 and 2023
(1,731)
- Between 2000 and 2009 (174)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (1,255)
- Between 2020 and 2023 (302)
- Unknown (49)