Your search
Results 15 resources
-
The Covid-19 Responses for Equity (CORE) programme was a three-year initiative funded by the Canadian International Development Research Centre (IDRC) that brought together 20 projects from across the global South to understand the socioeconomic impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic, improve existing responses, and generate better policy options for recovery. The research covered 42 countries across Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East to understand the ways in which the pandemic...
-
Audience This guidance is primarily aimed at development and humanitarian professionals who design or manage monitoring and evaluation processes to support design and implementation of qualitative monitoring using Most Significant Change (MSC), Outcome Harvesting (OH), or Outcome Mapping (OM), which are participatory, outcome-focused qualitative methods. Purpose This guidance is a resource to strengthen qualitative monitoring, specifically addressing commonplace gaps or weakness in the...
-
This article explores the challenges of monitoring and evaluating politically informed and adaptive programmes in the international development field. We assess the strengths and weaknesses of some specific evaluation methodologies which have been suggested as particularly appropriate for these kinds of programmes based on scholarly literature and the practical experience of the authors in using them. We suggest that those methods which assume generative causality are particularly well...
-
Evaluation processes that facilitate learning among advocates must be nimble, creative, and meaningful while transcending putative performance and accountability management. This article describes the experience, lessons, and trajectory of one such approach, Simple, Participatory Assessment of Real Change (SPARC), that a transnational HIV prevention research advocacy coalition pilot-tested in sub-Saharan Africa. Inspired by the pioneering work of the outcome harvesting (OH) and participatory...
-
Key messages • This working paper introduces a set of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) tools and approaches, discussing their potential usefulness in supporting adaptive management in development and humanitarian programmes. It emphasises adaptive programmes characterised by complex aspects, such as: (1) they are innovative; (2) they have uncertain pathways for change; or (3) they operate in uncertain or unstable environments. • The majority of these tools have been used in international...
-
This website is a source of applications, events and resources to support the development of a community of practitioners of Outcome Harvesting. BetterEvaluation is one of three sister sites of OutcomeHarvesting.net
-
The Strategic Program for Analyzing Complexity and Evaluating Systems (SPACES MERL) project is an activity funded by USAID’s Global Development Lab and the Bureau for Policy, Planning and Learning (PPL). This three-year activity aims to bring a variety of tools and methodologies that decision-makers can use (alone or in combination) to provide comprehensive systems analysis. The activity is being implemented from 2015 to 2018 by a consortium of organizations expert in systems and...
-
Outcome Harvesting collects (“harvests”) evidence of what has changed (“outcomes”) and, then, working backwards, determines whether and how an intervention has contributed to these changes. Outcome Harvesting has proven to be especially useful in complex situations when it is not possible to define concretely most of what an intervention aims to achieve, or even, what specific actions will be taken over a multi-year period.
-
Ricardo Wilson-Grau, former Chair of the Board of Stewards of the Outcome Mapping Learning Community, introduces Outcome Harvesting, an approach for retrospective identification of outcomes based on the principles of Outcome Mapping. More details here: http://www.outcomemapping.ca/nuggets/outcome-harvesting
-
Outcome Harvesting was developed by Ricardo Wilson-Grau with colleagues Barbara Klugman, Claudia Fontes, David Wilson-Sánchez, Fe Briones Garcia, Gabriela Sánchez, Goele Scheers, Heather Britt, Jennifer Vincent, Julie Lafreniere, Juliette Majot, Marcie Mersky, Martha Nuñez, Mary Jane Real, Natalia Ortiz, and Wolfgang Richert. Over the past 8 years, Outcome Harvesting and has been used to monitor and evaluate the achievements of hundreds of networks, non-governmental organizations, research...
Explore
Theme
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
- Outcome Harvesting
- Case Study (1)
- Contribution Analysis (2)
- Developmental Evaluation (1)
- Impact evaluation (1)
- Indicator-based approaches (2)
- Innovation System Analysis (1)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (1)
- MEL in International Development (1)
- Most Significant Change (4)
- Narrative Based Approaches (1)
- Outcome Mapping (5)
- Political Economy Analysis (1)
- Process Tracing (1)
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (2)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (1)
- Realist Evaluation (1)
- Rigour (1)
- Rubrics (1)
- Scenario Planning (2)
-
Sense-making
(1)
- SenseMaker (1)
- Stakeholder Feedback (2)
- Systemic Change (1)
- Theory-based evaluations (1)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (2)
- Adaptive Approaches [+] (4)
- Cases (3)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(1)
- NGO Perspectives (1)
-
Geography
(3)
-
Africa
(3)
- Central Africa (1)
- Eastern Africa (2)
- Northern Africa (1)
- Southern Africa (1)
- West Africa (3)
-
Americas
(1)
- Central America (1)
- South America (1)
-
Asia
(2)
-
Southern Asia
(2)
- Bangladesh (1)
- India (1)
- Pakistan (1)
- Sri Lanka (1)
- Western Asia (1)
-
Southern Asia
(2)
-
Africa
(3)
- Sectors [+] (2)
Resource type
- Blog Post (1)
- Journal Article (3)
- Report (9)
- Video Recording (1)
- Web Page (1)