Your search
Results 288 resources
-
In the CEDIL Methods brief, ‘Evaluating complex interventions: What are appropriate methods?’ we identify four types of complex development interventions: long causal chain interventions, multicomponent interventions, portfolio interventions, and system-level interventions. These interventions are characterised by multiple activities, multiple outcomes, multiple components, a high level of interconnectedness, and non-linear outcomes.
-
9 propositions can help evaluators measure progress on complex social problems.
-
• For some interventions, tight and testable theories of change are not appropriate – for example, in fast moving humanitarian emergencies or participatory development programmes, a more flexible approach is needed. • However, it is still possible to have a flexible project design and to draw conclusions about causal attribution. This middle path involves ‘loose’ theories of change, where activities and outcomes may be known, but the likely causal links between them are not yet clear. • ...
-
This guide presents the Kinnect Group’s approach to evaluation. Developed through ten years of collaborative work, it has been well tested. While there are many other guides to evaluation and different ways to do it, our approach emphasises the place of evaluative reasoning in evaluation. The guide draws on the work of many evaluation theorists, as well as our practice-based body of knowledge. We hope that using the building blocks as explained in the guide will help you in your endeavour to...
-
This document is made up of a range of Evaluation Working Papers (EWP) focused on evaluation for equitable development. Put together by evaluation specialists they present strategic evaluation findings, lessons learned and innovative approaches and methodologies. Part 1:Evaluation and equity Evaluation to accelerate progress towards equity, social justice and human rights 2 Human rights and gender equality in evaluation 13 When human rights is the starting point for evaluation...
-
This guide, written by Pamela J. Cox, Dana Keener, Tifanee L. Woodard, & Abraham H. Wandersman for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) outlines a seven step process for hiring an evaluator to implement an empowerment evaluation. The process begins with preparing for the hiring and concludes with an assessment of an evaluation to ensure its sustainability. Excerpt "...concerns and experiences with independent evaluation led to the development of participatory evaluation...
-
This report presents the findings of an evaluation of Sida’s management of the market systems development (MSD) approach. It aims to inform thinking on how Sida can best manage its growing portfolio of MSD programs. Beyond this, it provides insights relevant to Sida’s wider support to complex and adaptive programs. The evaluation identified several factors that affect Sida’s ability to ensure that conducive conditions are in place for effective MSD programs and good development programming...
-
This report presents the findings of an evaluation of Sida’s management of the market systems development (MSD) approach. It aims to inform thinking on how Sida can best manage its growing portfolio of MSD programs. Beyond this, it provides insights relevant to Sida’s wider support to complex and adaptive programs. The evaluation identified several factors that affect Sida’s ability to ensure that conducive conditions are in place for effective MSD programs and good development programming...
-
Calls for more ‘adaptive programming’ have been prominent in international development practice for over a decade. Learning-by-doing is a crucial element of this, but programmes have often found it challenging to become more learning oriented. Establishing some form of reflective practice, against countervailing incentives, is difficult. Incorporating data collection processes that generate useful, timely and practical information to inform these reflections is even more so.This paper...
-
These Checklists for Exit along the Sustainability Project Cycle are based on lessons from ex-post evaluations that Valuing Voices has done or researched. Ex-post project completion evaluations are rare and even more so those that consulted partners and participants in the field about sustained impacts. Over $3.5 trillion has been spent on public foreign aid projects in the past 70 years (OECD 2019) yet we have evaluated less than 1% of these projects for sustainability. Our Valuing Voices...
-
Drawing on action research, this paper recasts evaluation as ‘action inquiry’, an embedded evaluative learning practice that can help navigate complexity when enacting collective leadership. It is offered as an invitation to inquiry amongst a reasonably well-informed audience of policy makers and practitioners who work in and for public services. It will particularly interest those who provide research, evaluation and facilitation support, and those seeking to develop a more relational...
-
CARE's Failing Forward initiative is sparking opportunities to showcase the ideas that don't work so we can spend more time implementing the ones that do. It's changing the conversation inside the organization, and leading to changes in the way we design and implement programs.
-
This guide has been developed to help build confidence and capability, distilling useful tips and considerations that may help teams think through programme delivery issues and interpret elements of the PrOF Rules. This PrOF Guide lays out: - The definition of beneficiary engagement. - The case for beneficiary engagement. - FCDO’s approach to beneficiary engagement. - Practical tips for how to integrate beneficiary engagement throughout the programme cycle, including guiding questions to...
-
The U.S. Army has adopted the After Action Review AAR as its primary method of providing feedback after unit collective training exercises. The AAR is an interactive discussion in which unit members decide what happened, why it happened, and how to improve or sustain collective performance in future exercises. other services and organizations outside the military are also beginning to employ the AAR as a feedback tool. This report describes the twenty-five year history of AAR research and...
-
A study of how development efforts can be strengthened by an awareness of political economy, reflecting on the experiences of PoGo policy researchers.
-
As with all public policy work, education policies are demanding. Policy workers need to ‘know’ a lot—about the problems they are addressing, the people who need to be engaged, the promises they can make in response, the context they are working in, and the processes they will follow to implement. Most policy workers answer questions about such issues within the structures of plan and control processes used to devise budgets and projects. These structures limit their knowledge gathering,...
Explore
Theme
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (4)
- After Action Reviews (4)
- Appreciative Inquiry (1)
- Beneficiary Assessment/Engagement (8)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Case Study (4)
- Causal Mechanisms (1)
- Circular charts applications (radar, pie, sunburst, spiderweb, orbic, etc) (1)
- Context Monitoring (1)
- Contribution Analysis (5)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Critical Systems Heuristics (3)
- Democratic Evaluation (2)
- Desk based research/lit review (2)
- Developmental Evaluation (8)
- Diaries (1)
- Empowerment Evaluation (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (2)
- Evaluability assessment (2)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (5)
- Ex-post Evaluation (3)
- Feedback Systems (3)
- Focus Group Discussions (1)
- Horizontal Evaluation (1)
- Impact evaluation (7)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (3)
- Indicator-based approaches (4)
- Innovation History (1)
- Innovation System Analysis (3)
- Institutional Histories (2)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (4)
- Logical Framework (5)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (3)
- MEL Bricolage (1)
- MEL in International Development (12)
- Most Significant Change (3)
- Narrative Based Approaches (2)
- Network Analysis (2)
- Outcome Harvesting (8)
- Outcome Mapping (17)
- Participatory Action Research (9)
- Participatory Evaluation (10)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (5)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (2)
- Political Economy Analysis (12)
- Political Sentiment Analysis (PSA) (1)
- Portfolio Management (11)
- Positive Deviance (3)
- Post Project Evaluations (1)
- Process Tracing (3)
- Public Management Theory (1)
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (4)
- Qualitative data analysis and grounded theory (1)
- Qualitative Impact Assessment Protocol (3)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (8)
- Realist Evaluation (4)
- Remote Monitoring (1)
- Rigour (2)
- Rubrics (6)
- Scenario Planning (3)
- SenseMaker (4)
- Social Return on Investment (1)
- Stakeholder analysis (2)
- Stakeholder Feedback (2)
- Strategy testing (2)
- Success Case Method (1)
- Surveys (2)
- Sustainability (3)
- Systemic Change (25)
- Systems Mapping (4)
- Tech 4 MEL (4)
- Theory-based evaluations (4)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (30)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (3)
- Value for Investment (3)
- Value for Money (7)
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(110)
- Adaptive Learning (18)
- Adaptive Management (44)
- Adaptive Rigour (2)
- Agile & Lean approaches (2)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (9)
- Design Thinking / HCD (2)
- Doing Development Differently (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (8)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (1)
- Other Adaptive approaches (2)
-
Other sectors
(2)
- Military (2)
- Participation (2)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (1)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (7)
- Results Based Management (1)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (35)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (8)
- Cases (31)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(50)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- Canada - GAC & IDRC (1)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (11)
- G7 (1)
- GIZ (Germany) (6)
- Hivos - Netherlands (1)
- Irish Aid (2)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- NGO Perspectives (13)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (2)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (2)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (1)
- SDC - Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (2)
- SIDA - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (3)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (3)
- USAID (9)
-
Geography
(31)
-
Africa
(18)
- Central Africa (2)
- Eastern Africa (13)
- Northern Africa (2)
-
Southern Africa
(1)
- South Africa (1)
-
West Africa
(11)
- Benim (1)
- Niger (3)
- Nigeria (5)
- Senegal (1)
- Sierra Leone (1)
-
Americas
(5)
-
Central America
(4)
- Ecuador (2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (3)
- South America (3)
-
Central America
(4)
-
Asia
(16)
- South-eastern Asia (3)
-
Southern Asia
(10)
- Bangladesh (5)
- India (1)
- Nepal (6)
- Pakistan (3)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Europe
(4)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
- Spain (1)
-
Western Europe
(3)
- Germany (3)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
-
Africa
(18)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (3)
-
Practical
(41)
- Tools (4)
-
Sectors [+]
(72)
- Advocacy and Activism (1)
- Agriculture (1)
- Alternative Development (6)
- Cash Trasfers (1)
- Children (7)
- Citizen Engagement (3)
- Climate Change (2)
- Combatting violent extremism (1)
- Economic development (7)
- Education (3)
- Employment (1)
- Environmental Management (1)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (7)
- Gender (3)
- Governance and Accountability (14)
- Health (2)
- Humanitarian Aid (4)
- Innovation (in Development) (5)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (1)
- Knowledge to Practice (5)
- Locally driven development (2)
- NGOs (4)
- Organizational Change (4)
- Peace Building (2)
- Scaling up / Propagating (4)
- Social Accountability (4)
- Waste Management (1)
Resource type
Publication year
- Between 1900 and 1999 (11)
- Between 2000 and 2024 (277)