Your search
Results 732 resources
-
The Health Forward Foundation recently completed a two-year journey with the Equitable Evaluation Initiative as a practicing partner. This partnership provided us with the support to push for change that better aligned with our new focus, prioritizing racial equity and economic advancement. The partnership also allowed us to explore a number of questions fundamental to our work in learning and evaluation: what we really know about the impact philanthropy is making in our communities; how we...
-
Responses to sustainability challenges are not delivering results at the scale and speed called for by science, international agreements, and concerned citizens. Yet there is a tendency to underestimate the large-scale impacts of small-scale, local, and contextualized actions, and particularly the role of individuals in scaling transformations. Here, we explore a fractal approach to scaling sustainability transformations based on “universal values.” Universal values are proposed as intrinsic...
-
Learning circles are an approach where individuals with a common interest meet regularly to learn from each other about a self-identified topic in a format chosen by the group. Honoring a group’s collective wisdom, centering participants’ learning needs, and prioritizing relationships and trust are all features of learning circles. This practice is of increasing interest to funders and evaluators as a tool for practicing learning and evaluation aligned with the Equitable Evaluation...
-
This article describes the journey of the Research and Evaluation team at the Annie E. Casey Foundation to develop an approach that would allow us to rethink and deepen how we, as funders of research and evaluation, center equity in our practice. In particular, we explain how, through this process, we began to focus on what it means to orient research and evaluation toward participant owners and came to examine the assumptions, expectations, habits, and values that we held. These...
-
This report addresses the well-recognized evidence gap1 on the longer-term impacts created by marketdriven programming; specifically, programming influenced by market systems development (MSD) principles. It does so by presenting the findings of an ex-post study conducted three and a half years after the close of USAID’s Feed the Future Senegal Naatal Mbay Activity (hereafter Naatal Mbay) in 2019. It examines the scale and sustainability of changes resulting from Naatal Mbay’s introduction...
-
This article offers initial insights into the overlap, positioning, shared values, and convergences between RenDanHeYi compared to agile practices.
-
Programmes that aim to tackle complex societal issues, such as the worst forms of child labour, require rich partnerships that bring together different perspectives. CLARISSA’s consortium partnership adopts an empowerment approach to the interventions we deliver and our ways of working together. Part of this approach involves ongoing reflection and learning about how we work together in our partnership, and how this can be adapted if needed. This learning note focuses on a method used in...
-
For AC practitioners, systems mapping is essential but also difficult. To lessen obstacles, Peter Woodrow proposes a scaffolded approach. An Experiment in “Fast Forwarding” Drawing upon our near-decade work on corruption, we recently decided to try an experiment: we would present “common patterns” of corruption as tentative models to adapt and add to—rather than try to teach people to do systems mapping from scratch. In this teaching experiment, each common pattern would function as a kind...
-
Check out this video to see what’s inside our new resource: Practitioners' Guidance to Assessing Systems Change, developed by MEL Managers for MEL Managers. (Check out the Guidance here https://bit.ly/MSPMELClinics.) Hear from the authors about which parts they love the most and how this guide challenges MEL managers to assess systems change as an ongoing aspect of implementation, generating feedback that teams need to better understand and catalyze change, for more impact.
-
DT Global is proud to introduce our new Guidance Note: Practical Introduction to Adaptive Management There is a growing consensus around adaptive management as an effective (even necessary) approach when programs are tackling complex development problems. While there is no standard definition of adaptive management, there is general agreement that such programs need to routinely engage with and respond to program context; constantly test what works in that context; and adjust approaches,...
-
The world changes too much for anyone who is invested in social change work to imagine that this work is linear and predictable. Opportunities come and go, whether caused by a pandemic or political shifts. This much most social movement leaders and activists intuitively understand. But what can be done with this realization? How might movement groups better prepare for moments of opportunity? We want to explore how we can create the changes we want to see by responding to the changes that are outside our control.
-
The idea that technologies can change moral beliefs and practices is an old one. But how, exactly, does this happen? This paper builds on an emerging field of inquiry by developing a synoptic taxonomy of the mechanisms of techno-moral change. It argues that technology affects moral beliefs and practices in three main domains: decisional (how we make morally loaded decisions), relational (how we relate to others) and perceptual (how we perceive situations). It argues that across these three...
-
A resource designed to help organisations, teams and individuals manage innovation journeys responsibly and successfully. We have partnered with MIT D-Lab to develop a new resource to drive greater diversity and inclusion within project design and implementation. The Participation for Humanitarian Innovation (PfHI) toolkit sets out a robust approach to setting expectations for and monitoring the degree of participation within research and innovation projects for, with, and by people...
-
A resource designed to help organisations, teams and individuals manage innovation journeys responsibly and successfully. We have partnered with MIT D-Lab to develop a new resource to drive greater diversity and inclusion within project design and implementation. The Participation for Humanitarian Innovation (PfHI) toolkit sets out a robust approach to setting expectations for and monitoring the degree of participation within research and innovation projects for, with, and by people...
-
This study explored how the Outreach Philippines, Inc. (OPI) implements the participatory human development (PHD) approach using transformative communication, in a community-based organization (CBO), Lawag ti Caridad Norte Association (LCNA), in Caridad Norte, Llanera, Nueva Ecija. A phenomenological lens examined the lived experiences of six participants interviewed on December 10 and 13, 2022, and through my own reflections as a community development worker of OPI. Specifically, I analyzed...
-
Addressing 21st century development challenges requires investments in innovation, including the use of new approaches and technologies. Currently, many development organisations prioritise investments in isolated innovation pilots that leverage a specific approach or technology rather than pursuing a strategic approach to expand the organisation’s toolbox with innovations that have proven their comparative advantage over what is currently used. This Working Paper addresses this challenge of...
-
How can donors and grantees work together to create effective monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) practices that drive field-wide transformation?
-
Achieving impact through research for development programmes (R4D) requires engagement with diverse stakeholders across the research, development and policy divides. Understanding how such programmes support the emergence of outcomes, therefore, requires a focus on the relational aspects of engagement and collaboration. Increasingly, evaluation of large research collaborations is employing social network analysis (SNA), making use of its relational view of causation. In this paper, we use...
-
Large publicly funded programmes of research continue to receive increased investment as interventions aiming to produce impact for the world’s poorest and most marginalized populations. At this intersection of research and development, research is expected to contribute to complex processes of societal change. Embracing a co-produced view of impact as emerging along uncertain causal pathways often without predefined outcomes calls for innovation in the use of complexity-aware approaches to...
Explore
Theme
-
Sectors [+]
- Advocacy and Activism (9)
- Agriculture (6)
- Alternative Development (138)
- Behavioural Change (8)
- Cash Trasfers (2)
- Children (10)
- Citizen Engagement (63)
- Climate Change (11)
- Combatting violent extremism (6)
- Economic development (17)
- Education (8)
- Employment (2)
- Environmental Management (33)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (15)
- Gender (10)
- Governance and Accountability (168)
- Health (13)
- Humanitarian Aid (10)
- Inclusion/Disability (1)
-
Innovation (in Development)
(72)
- Funding (1)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (20)
- Institutional Reform (6)
- Judicial systems (3)
- Knowledge to Practice (34)
- Land Reform (1)
- Locally driven development (27)
- NGOs (29)
- Organizational Change (18)
- Pastoralism (1)
- Peace Building (12)
- Philanthropy/Funding (34)
- Private Sector Development (1)
- Research for Development (R4D) (6)
- Rural development (10)
- Scaling up / Propagating (33)
- Social Accountability (138)
- Social Change (5)
- Social Protection (4)
-
Technology (in Development)
(51)
- Appropriate Tech (6)
- Waste Management (1)
- Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) (1)
- Youth (3)
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(302)
- Adaptive/Emergent Learning (36)
- Adaptive Management (116)
- Adaptive Rigour (1)
- Agile & Lean approaches (16)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (4)
-
Design Thinking / HCD / Appropriate tech
(55)
- ICT4D/Sustainability (20)
- Doing Development Differently (6)
- Human Learning Systems (1)
- Implementation Research (3)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (10)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (2)
- Other Adaptive approaches (7)
-
Other sectors
(22)
- Activism and Social Movements (1)
- Government (1)
- Organizational Management (4)
- Project management (2)
- Software Development (14)
- Sport (1)
- Participation (6)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (5)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (10)
- Positive Deviance, 2 loops models, agentic capacity (7)
- Results Based Management (1)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (56)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (28)
- Cases (92)
- Courses (2)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(93)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- Canada - GAC & IDRC (3)
- China (3)
- DCED - Donor Committee for Enterprise Development (1)
- Develpment Industry - Private Companies and ThinkTanks (6)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (13)
- G7 (1)
- GIZ (Germany) (6)
- Hivos - Netherlands (1)
- IFAD (1)
- ILO (1)
- Irish Aid (1)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- NGO/CSO Perspectives (23)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (1)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (7)
- SIDA - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (1)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (3)
- USAID (18)
- WFP (1)
- World Bank (9)
-
Geography
(85)
-
Africa
(44)
- Central Africa (6)
- Eastern Africa (28)
- Northern Africa (2)
-
Southern Africa
(4)
- Lesotho (2)
- South Africa (1)
- Swaziland (1)
- West Africa (20)
-
Americas
(8)
-
Central America
(3)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (2)
- North America (2)
- South America (5)
-
Central America
(3)
-
Asia
(39)
-
Eastern Asia
(4)
- China (4)
-
South-eastern Asia
(14)
- Cambodia (3)
- Indonesia (2)
- Lao People's Democratic Republic (1)
- Malaysia (1)
- Myanmar (6)
- Philippines (2)
- Thailand (1)
- Timor Leste (1)
- Viet Nam (2)
-
Southern Asia
(19)
- Bangladesh (11)
- India (1)
- Nepal (9)
- Pakistan (5)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Eastern Asia
(4)
-
Europe
(3)
-
Northern Europe
(2)
- United Kingdom (2)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
- Spain (1)
-
Northern Europe
(2)
- Many geographies (2)
-
Oceania
(4)
- Australia and New Zealand (2)
-
Melanesia
(2)
- Papua New Guinea (1)
-
Africa
(44)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(167)
- After Action Reviews (3)
- AI support (3)
- Artificial Intelligence (1)
- Capacity Development (3)
- Case Study (2)
- Causal mapping, pahtways, mechanisms (3)
- Circular charts applications (radar, pie, sunburst, spiderweb, orbic, etc) (1)
- Community Led MEL (2)
- Comparisons/Benchmarking (1)
- Context Monitoring (3)
- Contribution Analysis (3)
- Conversation Based Reporting (2)
- Cost-Benefit Analysis (3)
- Cost-effectiveness analysis (1)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Cross-sectional study (1)
- Data mining (1)
- Delphi Survey (1)
- Descriptive Statistics (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (3)
- Diaries/Journals/Logs (2)
- Emergent Learning (2)
- Equitable Evaluation (7)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (5)
- Evaluability assessment (1)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (1)
- Ex-post Evaluation (2)
- Feedback Systems (1)
- Focus Group Discussions (3)
- Future Thinking / Horizon Scanning / Scenario Planning (3)
- Impact evaluation (6)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (1)
- Innovation System Analysis (2)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (5)
- Logical Framework (3)
- MEL in International Development (16)
- Most Significant Change (2)
- Network Analysis (2)
- Objectives and options analysis (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (3)
- Outcome Mapping (2)
- Participatory Action Research (11)
- Participatory Approaches and Evaluation (4)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (2)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (3)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (1)
- Policy Scientific Approach (1)
- Political Economy Analysis (8)
- Portfolio Approach & Management (4)
- Positive Deviance (1)
- Power Analysis (1)
- Process Tracing (3)
- Public Management Theory (1)
- Qualitative data analysis and grounded theory (2)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (2)
- Realist Evaluation (3)
- Relationships weaving and facilitation (4)
- Rigour (2)
- Rubrics (3)
-
Sense-making
(3)
- SenseMaker (1)
- Social Media Metrics (1)
- Stakeholder analysis (3)
- Stakeholder Feedback (1)
- Strategy testing (1)
- Surveys (4)
- Sustainability (2)
- SWOT Analysis (1)
- Systemic Change (22)
- Systems Mapping (8)
- Theory-based evaluations (3)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (17)
- Trust-based evaluation (/philanthropy /learning) (3)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (1)
- Value for Investment (1)
- Value for Money (4)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (9)
-
Practical
(59)
- Tools (13)
Resource type
- Blog Post (62)
- Book (96)
- Book Section (27)
- Conference Paper (11)
- Document (1)
- Journal Article (185)
- Magazine Article (6)
- Presentation (2)
- Report (324)
- Thesis (6)
- Video Recording (1)
- Web Page (11)
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(34)
-
Between 1940 and 1949
(1)
- 1948 (1)
- Between 1960 and 1969 (5)
- Between 1970 and 1979 (5)
- Between 1980 and 1989 (9)
- Between 1990 and 1999 (14)
-
Between 1940 and 1949
(1)
-
Between 2000 and 2026
(695)
- Between 2000 and 2009 (53)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (416)
- Between 2020 and 2026 (226)
- Unknown (3)