Your search
Results 152 resources
-
This paper captures lessons from recent experiences on using ‘theories of change’ amongst organisations involved in the research–policy interface. The literature in this area highlights much of the complexity inherent in the policymaking process, as well as the challenges around finding meaningful ways to measure research uptake. As a tool, ‘theories of change’ offers much, but the paper argues that the very complexity and dynamism of the research-to-policy process means that any theory of...
-
Brinkerhoff’s model isn’t restricted to learning. It can be used to analyze any major business change, such as the purchase of new equipment or implementation of a new process. It’s based on the assumption that any initiative, no matter how successful or unsuccessful, will always include some success and some failure. It seeks to uncover the most impactful successes and failures of an initiative and then tell the stories behind them, backed by evidence. Your organization can use these...
-
This working paper is a methodological contribution to the emerging debate on monitoring and evaluation (M&E) in the context of climate change adaptationand disaster risk reduction. Effectively managing disaster risk is critical for adapting to the impacts of climate change, however disasters risk reduction M&E practice may be limited in capturing progress towards adaptation. The unique nature of adaptation to climate change calls for experience-based learning M&E processes for discovering...
-
This paper assesses the relevance of adaptive or trial-and-error approaches to the field of governance, peace building and human rights. Tackling the problems of poverty, vulnerability and exclusion that persist in parts of the world that continue to be affected by violence or political insecurity is difficult for several reasons. For one, because of the complexity of the prevailing social, economic and political systems, solutions to chronic problems are far from obvious. One response to...
-
Adaptive programmes can be accountable, rigorous and high quality in how they use evidence by taking an ’adaptive rigour’ approach. Core development and humanitarian challenges are complex, and require processes of testing, learning and iteration to find solutions – adaptive management offers one approach for this. Yet large bureaucracies and development organisations can have low tolerance for experimentation and learning, and adaptive management can be viewed as an excuse for ‘making...
-
This document is relevant for any position or hiring mechanism. While this document does not explicitly address what happens when someone arrives into a newly-created position, which has its own set of challenges, many of the principles, actions, and resources can be applied in that context. Section 1 offers guidance for how to set up and implement systems at Mission/OU or office to ensure that all staff help preserve institutional memory and enable continuity of relationships. This section...
-
This technical analysis explores previous and ongoing social learning efforts, best practices, challenges, and lessons in USAID as a foundation for improving the implementation and design of the Agency’s forestry and biodiversity programs. This analysis is particularly relevant as the Bureau of Economic Growth, Education and the Environment’s Office of Forestry and Biodiversity (E3/FAB) begins to develop a Cross-Mission Learning Program under the Measuring Impact initiative, a five-year...
-
In 2016, the Bureau of Policy, Planning and Learning (PPL) commissioned an internal stocktaking of USAID's mission-based MEL (Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning) Platforms.
-
Policy influence and advocacy are increasingly regarded as a means of creating sustainable policy change in international development. It is often also seen as a difficult area to monitor and evaluate. Yet there is an increasingly rich strand of innovation in options to monitor, evaluate and learn from both the successes and failures of policy influence and advocacy interventions. This paper explores current trends in monitoring and evaluating policy influence and advocacy; discusses...
-
Most measurement and adaptive management approaches were developed for and from individual projects. This briefing aims to guide measurement and management of country-level portfolios of work. It identifies potential purposes portfolio-level analyses can fulfil, types of adaptation, and the relative role of monitoring, learning and evaluation (MEL). Drawing on reviews of practice from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the United Kingdom Department for...
-
Using monitoring data to improve interventions is harder than it seems. Decision-makers are often busy implementing activities, unclear about their roles in data collection and analysis, and uncertain what data matters most or when. PRISMA, an AUD77 million agricultural Market Systems Development (MSD) programme funded by DFAT Australia, has encountered these challenges. With the programme completing its first five year phase, this case study shares ten key lessons divided into three...
-
For organizations committed to social change, advocacy often figures as a crucial strategic element. How to assess effectiveness in advocacy is, therefore, important. The usefulness of Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) in advocacy are subject to much current debate. Advocacy staff, MEL professionals, senior managers, the funding community, and stakeholders of all kinds are searching for ways to improve practices – and thus their odds of success – in complex and contested advocacy...
-
Multi-project programmes can serve different purposes. For instance, they may coordinate multiple implementing entities; standardise management and technical support; compare intervention approaches across different contexts; enhance leverage through joint action; or foster sustainability by building relationships among organisations. • At the same time, multi-project programmes are costly, potentially duplicate other mechanisms that fulfil similar functions, and can dilute focus and create...
Explore
Theme
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (2)
- Beneficiary Assessment/Engagement (2)
- Case Study (1)
- Causal Mechanisms (1)
- Contribution Analysis (1)
- Critical Systems Heuristics (1)
- Democratic Evaluation (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (1)
- Developmental Evaluation (7)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (1)
- Evaluability assessment (1)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (3)
- Ex-post Evaluation (1)
- Focus Group Discussions (1)
- Impact evaluation (4)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (1)
- Indicator-based approaches (3)
- Innovation System Analysis (2)
- Knowledge Management (2)
- Logical Framework (2)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (3)
- MEL in International Development (4)
- Most Significant Change (2)
- Narrative Based Approaches (1)
- Network Analysis (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (7)
- Outcome Mapping (9)
- Participatory Action Research (3)
- Participatory Evaluation (5)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (3)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (1)
- Political Economy Analysis (9)
- Political Sentiment Analysis (PSA) (1)
- Portfolio Management (6)
- Public Management Theory (1)
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (4)
- Qualitative data analysis and grounded theory (1)
- Qualitative Impact Assessment Protocol (2)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (2)
- Realist Evaluation (2)
- Scenario Planning (3)
- SenseMaker (3)
- Social Return on Investment (1)
- Stakeholder analysis (1)
- Stakeholder Feedback (2)
- Strategy testing (1)
- Success Case Method (1)
- Surveys (1)
- Systemic Change (5)
- Theory-based evaluations (2)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (23)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (2)
- Value for Investment (2)
- Value for Money (4)
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(51)
- Adaptive Learning (8)
- Adaptive Management (24)
- Adaptive Rigour (1)
- Agile & Lean approaches (1)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (5)
- Doing Development Differently (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (4)
- Other Adaptive approaches (2)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (1)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (4)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (13)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (5)
- Cases (16)
- Development Actors Perspectives (18)
-
Geography
(10)
-
Africa
(6)
- Central Africa (1)
-
Eastern Africa
(2)
- Mozambique (1)
- Uganda (1)
- West Africa (3)
- Asia (2)
-
Europe
(2)
-
Western Europe
(2)
- Germany (2)
-
Western Europe
(2)
-
Africa
(6)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (3)
-
Practical
(17)
- Tools (3)
-
Sectors [+]
(28)
- Advocacy and Activism (1)
- Alternative Development (4)
- Citizen Engagement (1)
- Combatting violent extremism (1)
- Economic development (2)
- Environmental Management (1)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (5)
- Gender (1)
- Governance and Accountability (4)
- Health (2)
- Humanitarian Aid (2)
- Innovation (in Development) (1)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (1)
- Knowledge to Practice (2)
- Locally driven development (1)
- NGOs (3)
- Organizational Change (1)
- Peace Building (1)
- Social Accountability (3)
- Waste Management (1)