Your search
Results 152 resources
-
Causal Link Monitoring (CLM) 1 integrates design and monitoring to support adaptive management of projects. CLM helps project planners and managers identify the processes that are required to achieve desired results, and then to observe whether those processes take place, and how. Result-producing processes specify the causal links between results in a logic model or results framework—in other words, the processes between results.2 CLM focuses on how specific individuals or organizations use...
-
In an effort to increase the understanding of conservation enterprises’ activities and outcomes and to improve the effectiveness of biodiversity programming, this brief synthesizes lessons from past USAID-funded efforts to support conservation enterprises
-
Developing useful theories of change (ToCs) for anintervention, especially complex interventions, is not straightforward nor something done in a couple of hourswith limited effort. Agreement is needed on a number of basic concepts and terms, key challenges need to be addressed, and there are numerous issues that need to be considered.Butthe effort is worth the investment of resources and time.Theory-based evaluation approaches need good ToCs.Some of the ideas here are discussed in the...
-
ICAI published this review on DFID’s approach to value for money in February 2018, and as value for money is both a process and an outcome and cuts across all aspects of DFID’s operations, did not score this review. We made five recommendations and published a follow-up to this review in July 2019. All UK government departments are required to achieve value for money in their use of public funds. In recent years, DFID has been working to build value for money considerations further into its...
-
This Discussion Note complements ADS 201 and outlines general principles and promising approaches for monitoring complex aspects of USAID development assistance. Complexity-aware monitoring is a type of complementary monitoring that is useful when results are difficult to predict due to dynamic contexts or unclear cause and-effect relationships. Key principles of the Program Cycle include applying analytic rigor, managing adaptively, and utilizing a range of approaches to achieve results....
-
Doing things differently: Rethinking monitoring and evaluation to understand change Learning paper Over the past four years, Saferworld has put in place a way of monitoring, evaluating and learning from our work focused on behaviour and relationship change. This paper outlines the process we have gone through to adapt, embed, and embrace an approach inspired by Outcome Mapping and Outcome Harvesting (OH). Key benefits of our monitoring, evaluation and learning approach are: It is simple,...
-
Adaptive management is at the heart of ‘doing development differently’ (Wild et al., 2016). Whether it is here to stay depends on how much it is mainstreamed into existing development programming by donors and implementers alike, especially in planning, monitoring, evaluation, and learning (PMEL) cycles. In this report, we find that mainstreaming adaptive management in PMEL involves three strategies: 1. planning for flexibility; 2. developing locally owned monitoring and evaluation (M&E);...
-
Monitoring and evaluation practice is using information and communication technologies for more timely data, and more inclusive voice and feedback.
-
This guidance note focuses on the utility of, and guidance for, evaluability assessment before undertaking an impact evaluation. The primary audience for this guidance note is evaluators conducting an evaluability assessment for impact evaluation. The secondary audience is people commissioning or managing an evaluability assessment for impact evaluation, as well as funders of an impact evaluation. Sections one and two provide an overview of evaluability assessment and how it can be used...
-
9 propositions can help evaluators measure progress on complex social problems.
-
• For some interventions, tight and testable theories of change are not appropriate – for example, in fast moving humanitarian emergencies or participatory development programmes, a more flexible approach is needed. • However, it is still possible to have a flexible project design and to draw conclusions about causal attribution. This middle path involves ‘loose’ theories of change, where activities and outcomes may be known, but the likely causal links between them are not yet clear. • ...
-
This guide presents the Kinnect Group’s approach to evaluation. Developed through ten years of collaborative work, it has been well tested. While there are many other guides to evaluation and different ways to do it, our approach emphasises the place of evaluative reasoning in evaluation. The guide draws on the work of many evaluation theorists, as well as our practice-based body of knowledge. We hope that using the building blocks as explained in the guide will help you in your endeavour to...
Explore
Theme
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (2)
- Beneficiary Assessment/Engagement (2)
- Case Study (1)
- Causal Mechanisms (1)
- Contribution Analysis (1)
- Critical Systems Heuristics (1)
- Democratic Evaluation (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (1)
- Developmental Evaluation (7)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (1)
- Evaluability assessment (1)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (3)
- Ex-post Evaluation (1)
- Focus Group Discussions (1)
- Impact evaluation (4)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (1)
- Indicator-based approaches (3)
- Innovation System Analysis (2)
- Knowledge Management (2)
- Logical Framework (2)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (3)
- MEL in International Development (4)
- Most Significant Change (2)
- Narrative Based Approaches (1)
- Network Analysis (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (7)
- Outcome Mapping (9)
- Participatory Action Research (3)
- Participatory Evaluation (5)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (3)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (1)
- Political Economy Analysis (9)
- Political Sentiment Analysis (PSA) (1)
- Portfolio Management (6)
- Public Management Theory (1)
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (4)
- Qualitative data analysis and grounded theory (1)
- Qualitative Impact Assessment Protocol (2)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (2)
- Realist Evaluation (2)
- Scenario Planning (3)
- SenseMaker (3)
- Social Return on Investment (1)
- Stakeholder analysis (1)
- Stakeholder Feedback (2)
- Strategy testing (1)
- Success Case Method (1)
- Surveys (1)
- Systemic Change (5)
- Theory-based evaluations (2)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (23)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (2)
- Value for Investment (2)
- Value for Money (4)
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(51)
- Adaptive Learning (8)
- Adaptive Management (24)
- Adaptive Rigour (1)
- Agile & Lean approaches (1)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (5)
- Doing Development Differently (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (4)
- Other Adaptive approaches (2)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (1)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (4)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (13)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (5)
- Cases (16)
- Development Actors Perspectives (18)
-
Geography
(10)
-
Africa
(6)
- Central Africa (1)
-
Eastern Africa
(2)
- Mozambique (1)
- Uganda (1)
- West Africa (3)
- Asia (2)
-
Europe
(2)
-
Western Europe
(2)
- Germany (2)
-
Western Europe
(2)
-
Africa
(6)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (3)
-
Practical
(17)
- Tools (3)
-
Sectors [+]
(28)
- Advocacy and Activism (1)
- Alternative Development (4)
- Citizen Engagement (1)
- Combatting violent extremism (1)
- Economic development (2)
- Environmental Management (1)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (5)
- Gender (1)
- Governance and Accountability (4)
- Health (2)
- Humanitarian Aid (2)
- Innovation (in Development) (1)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (1)
- Knowledge to Practice (2)
- Locally driven development (1)
- NGOs (3)
- Organizational Change (1)
- Peace Building (1)
- Social Accountability (3)
- Waste Management (1)