Your search
Results 955 resources
-
Everyone is talking about systems. Or at least, that's how it seems in my wonkish corner of the philanthropic world. You can't attend a conference or even have a meeting without hearing about systems, whether it's people trying to disrupt them, map them, learn from them, or catalyze them.
-
In this blog we are sharing a digest of some of the many useful and innovative monitoring, evaluation and learning resources and efforts that have come through the M&E Sandbox in 2022. A lot of these resources have been shared by our community in response to the overwhelmingly positive feedback from the launch of the Sandbox (please keep them coming!). We hope you find it useful. We have grouped these efforts and resources under six broad questions: - How do we measure systems...
-
Aid programmes need to be able to adapt their objectives and operations to changes in their political environment, since development processes are subject to political contestation. Change takes time and is often a matter of seizing the opportunity.
-
This learning paper highlights how elements of outcome mapping were used by Save the Children Sweden in a project (2018-2020) that supports adolescents, affected by the Syria crisis, to become more resilient. The paper first outlines how the spheres of influence framework has been applied to develop an actor focused theory of change. It then describes how progress markers, as an alternative to SMART indicators, were formulated to monitor the programme’s results. The paper also outlines how...
-
This paper by Adinda Van Hemelrijck and Irene Guijt explores how impact evaluation can live up to standards broader than statistical rigour in ways that address challenges of complexity and enable stakeholders to engage meaningfully. A Participatory Impact Assessment and Learning Approach (PIALA) was piloted to assess and debate the impacts on rural poverty of two government programmes in Vietnam and Ghana funded by the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). We discuss the...
-
Want to know better how your interventions can contribute to change? A Theory of Change (ToC) approach helps in deepening your understanding - and that of your partners - of how you collectively think change happens and what the effect will be of your intervention. Not only does it show what political, social, economic, and/or cultural factors are in play, it also clarifies your assumptions. Once a ToC has been developed, it can be used to continually reflect on it in ways that allow for...
-
There is growing interest in studying processes of human sensemaking, as this strongly influences human and organizational behavior as well as complex system dynamics due to the diverse lenses people use to interpret and act in the world. The Cognitive Edge SenseMaker® tool is one method for capturing and making sense of people’s attitudes, perceptions, and experiences. It is used for monitoring and evaluation; mapping ideas, mind-sets, and attitudes; and detecting trends and weak...
-
Transdisciplinarity is not a new science per se, but a new methodology for doing science with society. A particular challenge in doing science with society is the engagement with non-academic actors to enable joint problem formulation, analysis and transformation. How this is achieved differs between contexts. The premise of this paper is that transdisciplinary research (TDR) methodologies designed for developed world contexts cannot merely be replicated and transferred to developing world...
-
Within DFID, there is now a commitment to more flexible and adaptive programming. This recognises that: • DFID works in contexts that continuously evolve and change, sometimes in unpredictable ways. To respond to this, the agency needs to remain flexible – to expect change and have a good understanding of context, with resources that can be adjusted and scope to change direction if needed. All DFID programmes should be able to do this. • Some DFID programmes aim to support change in...
-
Adaptive programming suggests, at a minimum, that development actors react and respond to changes in the political and socio-economic operating environment. It emphasises learning and the development practitioner is encouraged to adjust their actions to find workable solutions to problems that they may face. Being prepared to react to change may seem like common sense – and indeed it is. However much development thinking and practice remains stuck in a linear planning model which...
-
Internal DFID document from the DevAdapt Programme. Based on another previous document (also internal).
-
The Theory of Change approach demands a radical shift towards more and better learning in development thinking and practice, creating a productive and much-needed space for critical reflection.
-
What have we learned from implementing results-based management in development co-operation organisations? What progress and benefits can be seen? What are the main challenges and unintended consequences? Are there good practices to address these challenges? To respond to these questions this paper reviews and analyses the findings from various evaluations and reviews of results-based management systems conducted by members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC), the OECD/DAC Results...
-
USAID’s Bureau for Policy, Planning and Learning (PPL) and its support mechanism, LEARN, have developed a Collaborating, Learning, and Adapting (CLA) Framework and Maturity tool to help USAID missions think more deliberately about how to plan for and implement CLA approaches that fit the mission’s context and assist them in achieving their development objectives. While the tool is intended primarily for USAID audiences to be used in participatory self-assessment workshops, the CLA Framework...
-
USAID’s Bureau for Policy, Planning and Learning (PPL) and its support mechanism, LEARN, have developed a Collaborating, Learning, and Adapting (CLA) Framework and Maturity tool to help USAID missions think more deliberately about how to plan for and implement CLA approaches that fit the mission’s context and assist them in achieving their development objectives. While the tool is intended primarily for USAID audiences to be used in participatory self-assessment workshops, the CLA Framework...
-
Although collaborating, learning, and adapting (CLA) are not new to USAID and its implementing partners, they often do not happen regularly or systematically and are not intentionally resourced. The CLA Framework above identifies components and subcomponents to help you think more deliberately about what approach to CLA might be best tailored to your organizational or project context. The framework recognizes the diversity of what CLA can look like in various organizations and projects while...
Explore
Theme
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
- Adaptive Learning (100)
- Adaptive Management (288)
- Adaptive Rigour (8)
- Agile & Lean approaches (104)
- Capacity WORKS (6)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (38)
- Design Thinking / HCD (103)
- Doing Development Differently (27)
- Global Delivery Initiative (3)
- Human Learning Systems (2)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (16)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (7)
- Other Adaptive approaches (29)
-
Other sectors
(58)
- Activism and Social Movements (2)
- Environmental (11)
- Government (1)
- Logistics & Product Development (11)
- Military (11)
- Organizational Management (19)
- Philosophical roots (3)
- Project management (2)
- Psychology (1)
- Sport (2)
- Participation (8)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (32)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (28)
- Positive Deviance & 2 loops model (20)
- Results Based Management (14)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (198)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (78)
- Cases (101)
- Courses (12)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(135)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- Canada - GAC & IDRC (3)
- China (3)
- DANIDA - Danish International Development Agency (1)
- DCED - Donor Committee for Enterprise Development (4)
- DFAT (Australia) (4)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (30)
- GIZ (Germany) (12)
- Hivos - Netherlands (1)
- IFAD (1)
- ILO (1)
- Irish Aid (1)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- New Zealand (1)
- NGO Perspectives (18)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (15)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (4)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (2)
- SDC - Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (1)
- SIDA - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (4)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (4)
- USAID (23)
- WFP (1)
- World Bank (14)
-
Geography
(103)
-
Africa
(65)
-
Central Africa
(5)
- Angola (1)
- Cameroon (1)
- Democratic Republic of the Congo (3)
-
Eastern Africa
(26)
- Ethiopia (1)
- Kenya (4)
- Malawi (1)
- Mozambique (5)
- Rwanda (3)
- Somalia (3)
- Somaliland (1)
- South Sudan (2)
- Tanzania (5)
- Uganda (6)
- Zambia (1)
- Zimbabwe (4)
- Northern Africa (2)
-
Southern Africa
(4)
- South Africa (4)
- West Africa (43)
-
Central Africa
(5)
-
Americas
(8)
-
Central America
(4)
- Costa Rica (1)
- Ecuador (1)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (2)
-
North America
(2)
- Canada (2)
- United States of America (1)
- South America (4)
-
Central America
(4)
-
Asia
(36)
-
Eastern Asia
(7)
- China (7)
-
South-eastern Asia
(13)
- Cambodia (3)
- Indonesia (2)
- Lao People's Democratic Republic (2)
- Myanmar (6)
- Philippines (1)
- Thailand (1)
- Timor Leste (1)
- Viet Nam (2)
-
Southern Asia
(13)
- Afghanistan (1)
- Bangladesh (6)
- India (2)
- Nepal (7)
- Pakistan (4)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Eastern Asia
(7)
-
Europe
(5)
-
Eastern Europe
(1)
- Ukraine (1)
-
Northern Europe
(2)
- United Kingdom (2)
-
Western Europe
(3)
- France (1)
- Netherlands (1)
- Switzerland (1)
-
Eastern Europe
(1)
- Many geographies (2)
-
Oceania
(5)
- Australia and New Zealand (3)
-
Melanesia
(2)
- Papua New Guinea (1)
-
Africa
(65)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(177)
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (2)
- After Action Reviews (6)
- Artificial Intelligence (1)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Context Monitoring (1)
- Contribution Analysis (2)
- Cost-Benefit Analysis (1)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Delphi Survey (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (1)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (4)
- Ex-post Evaluation (1)
- Focus Group Discussions (1)
- Impact evaluation (5)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (2)
- Indicator-based approaches (1)
- Innovation System Analysis (2)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (6)
- Logical Framework (2)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (4)
- MEL Bricolage (1)
- MEL in International Development (18)
- Most Significant Change (2)
- Narrative Based Approaches (2)
- Network Analysis (2)
- Outcome Harvesting (3)
- Outcome Mapping (4)
- Participatory Action Research (10)
- Participatory Evaluation (2)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (3)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (4)
- Political Economy Analysis (9)
- Portfolio Management (10)
- Positive Deviance (1)
- Power Analysis (1)
- Process Tracing (3)
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (2)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (2)
- Realist Evaluation (3)
- Rigour (1)
- Rubrics (6)
- Scenario Planning (3)
- SenseMaker (3)
- Stakeholder Feedback (1)
- Strategy testing (2)
- Surveys (1)
- SWOT Analysis (1)
- Systemic Change (32)
- Systems Mapping (7)
- Theory-based evaluations (5)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (12)
- Trans-disciplinary Research (1)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (3)
- Value for Money (5)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (20)
- Organizations (3)
-
Practical
(97)
- Tools (10)
-
Sectors [+]
(249)
- Advocacy and Activism (1)
- Agriculture (3)
- Alternative Development (57)
- Cash Trasfers (1)
- Children (3)
- Citizen Engagement (12)
- Climate Change (4)
- Combatting violent extremism (1)
- Economic development (11)
- Education (4)
- Employment (1)
- Environmental Management (11)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (9)
- Gender (7)
- Governance and Accountability (33)
- Health (7)
- Humanitarian Aid (5)
- Inclusion/Disability (1)
-
Innovation (in Development)
(20)
- Funding (1)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (13)
- Institutional Reform (5)
- Knowledge to Practice (11)
- Land Reform (1)
- Locally driven development (5)
- Locally led development (3)
- NGOs (18)
- Organizational Change (11)
- Pastoralism (1)
- Peace Building (9)
- Research for Development (R4D) (1)
- Rural development (6)
- Scaling up / Propagating (20)
- Social Accountability (18)
- Social Change (2)
-
Technology (in Development)
(38)
- Appropriate Tech (6)
- Waste Management (1)
- Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) (1)
Resource type
- Artwork (1)
- Blog Post (110)
- Book (124)
- Book Section (37)
- Conference Paper (22)
- Film (1)
- Forum Post (1)
- Journal Article (150)
- Magazine Article (21)
- Map (1)
- Newspaper Article (3)
- Presentation (7)
- Radio Broadcast (1)
- Report (426)
- Software (1)
- Thesis (4)
- Video Recording (8)
- Web Page (37)
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(59)
-
Between 1940 and 1949
(1)
- 1948 (1)
- Between 1950 and 1959 (3)
-
Between 1960 and 1969
(1)
- 1967 (1)
- Between 1970 and 1979 (6)
- Between 1980 and 1989 (16)
- Between 1990 and 1999 (32)
-
Between 1940 and 1949
(1)
-
Between 2000 and 2024
(895)
- Between 2000 and 2009 (71)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (601)
- Between 2020 and 2024 (222)
-
Between 2030 and 2024
(1)
- 2034 (1)
- Unknown (1)