Your search
Results 921 resources
-
This learning paper provides guidance to humanitarian innovators on how to use evidence to enable and drive adoption of innovation. Innovation literature and practice show time and time again that it is difficult to scale innovations. Even when an innovation is demonstrably impactful, better than the existing solution and good value for money, it does not automatically get adopted or used in mainstream humanitarian programming. Why do evidence-based innovations face difficulties in scaling...
-
Movement organizations work in inherently uncertain political environments. Whether an organization is advocating for a new minimum wage, working to close a private prison, or seeking to influence an election, the terrain they are operating on shifts nearly every day. That is increasingly true as political uncertainty rises in the 21st century, particularly for historically race-class subjugated communities. Any movement-based organization seeking to build, exercise, and win political power...
-
The enthusiasm for the potential of RCTs in development rests in part on the assumption that the use of the rigorous evidence that emerges from an RCT (or from a small set of studies identified as rigorous in a “systematic” review) leads to the adoption of more effective policies, programs or projects. However, the supposed benefits of using rigorous evidence for “evidence based” policy making depend critically on the extent to which there is external validity. If estimates of causal impact...
-
What is systemic design? Systemic design is the acknowledgement of complexity and interconnectedness throughout the design thinking and doing process. It is both a mindset and a methodology - considering the structures and beliefs that underpin a challenge. It asks both designers and non-designers to radically reimagine and create new ways of living. The climate and biodiversity crises, and associated social injustice, are the biggest challenges facing humanity today, and so design must...
-
Systemic Design Toolkit Our way of putting the Systemic Design Framework into practice. It is for people who want to use design to address the climate emergency, but who find that their current methods and ways of working are insufficient for the complexity of the challenge. The toolkit contains 11 tools that sit across the systemic design stages, helping you to adopt a systemic approach.
-
Among the many principles that currently inform donor-funded development initiatives, three appear to stand out: they should be politically informed, locally led, and adaptive. There is as yet little practical guidance for aid implementers regarding how to operationalise these approaches. What will it take to shift practice away from linear and planned approaches, towards models which foster local leadership and which engage with emergent and complex systems? This paper suggests that the...
-
The first case of COVID-19 in Nigeria was confirmed on 27 February 2020, with the first lockdown orders issued on 30 March 2020. The pandemic and resultant containment measures have had farreaching socio-cultural, economic, financial and political implications, globally as well as in Nigeria. For the Partnership to Engage, Reform and Learn (PERL) and its partners, the pandemic has required considerable adaptation of their strategic approach and working practices. This report reflects on...
-
This paper discusses how understanding the domestic political economy of climate governance is critical for developing informed strategies to build and sustain political ambition. It provides guidance and a methodology for domestic stakeholders to determine the types of institutional reforms, incentives, coalitions, and policy design that can entrench long-term political support for climate ambition. The assessment can also help users identify political barriers to more equitable climate...
-
This document introduces some of the key concepts of theory-based approaches to evaluation. It is hoped that readers will be encouraged by the information and advice provided in this document and will explore the use (e.g., through pilot evaluations) of theory-based approaches to evaluation in a federal setting. To support this, Sections 1.0 to 8.0 of the document describe the general application of theory-based approaches to evaluation, and Sections 9.0 and 10.0 discuss the potential...
-
This Green Paper intends to review key elements of the problem that Development actors will confront as a new decade opens up ahead of us. It will articulate a solution that we believe should become an inherent feature of Development programs and initiatives. This is the outcome of an intense period of experiences and reflections in the Development space across different geographies and institutional mandates and activities, during which the Foundation has collaborated with institutions such...
-
This guide has been developed to help build confidence and capability, distilling useful tips and considerations that may help teams think through programme delivery issues and interpret elements of the PrOF Rules. This PrOF Guide lays out: - The definition of beneficiary engagement. - The case for beneficiary engagement. - FCDO’s approach to beneficiary engagement. - Practical tips for how to integrate beneficiary engagement throughout the programme cycle, including guiding questions to...
-
Key takeaways. • Development is not linear or straightforward, but rather complex, uncertain and context-specific. This calls for international development actors to work differently, in ways that are based on deliberate experimentation, learning and adaptation, to inform decisions and drive effective development. • Although it might go by different names, adaptive programming has been used in a variety of areas and fields in both the public and private sectors. Development practitioners...
-
- The United Kingdom’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO)’s standard economy, efficiency, effectiveness/cost-effectiveness and equity (4E) framework is still relevant for approaching, measuring and managing value for money (VfM) for adaptive programmes. • However, this framework needs to be reframed to capture and incentivise flexibility, learning and adaptation. • VfM appraisal and reporting should be done in a way that draws on beneficiary feedback and informs good...
-
To mark 20 years of Outcome Mapping, this paper presents the core principles and concepts that are foundational to using the approach. It also presents a set of guiding practices to support transformative change. The OMLC Stewards presented the paper at a special webinar on 29th April 2021 - see the link below for the recording.
-
The purpose of this Adaptive Learning Guide is to provide MOMENTUM project teams with the information and resources to integrate adaptive learning into the design, implementation, and improvement of MNCH/FP/RH programs. This guide provides a conceptual introduction to adaptive learning using links to existing resources and real-world examples of how adaptive learning can drive continuous learning and improvement in project work. The guide is built upon three foundational assumptions: We work...
-
Key Messages New principles for OECD DAC members on ‘Managing for Sustainable Development Results’ emphasise tailoring result management approaches to different contexts; balancing internal compliance with empowerment at ground level; and adapting implementation in the pursuit of long-term outcomes. However development organisations face numerous challenges in aligning with these principles in practice. Reporting and evidence collection processes do not consistently encourage adaptive...
-
Essential points for practitioners and donors • Mediation offers a cost-effective and proven method for resolving armed conflict. Between 1985 and 2015, 75 per cent of armed conflicts in the world were resolved through agreement rather than by force. In most cases these processes will have involved third party facilitation or support. • Professional mediators understand the high stakes involved in their work to prevent, mitigate and resolve armed conflict. In addition, they and their...
-
What Passages has Learned about Adaptive Management: • Be reflective about information that is collected and create a culture of learning. • Be systematic about establishing monitoring and learning systems. • Be strategic about data sources and analysis, prioritizing areas for learning and addressing issues raised. • Be inclusive about information collection: who is collecting what, how, and how is it being used.
-
The Program Cycle is USAID’s operational model for planning, delivering, assessing, and adapting development programming in a given region or country to advance U.S. foreign policy. It encompasses guidance and procedures for: 1) Making strategic decisions at the regional or country level about programmatic areas of focus and associated resources; 2) Designing projects and supportive activities to implement strategic plans; and 3) Learning from performance monitoring, evaluations, and other...
Explore
Theme
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(465)
- Adaptive/Emergent Learning (45)
- Adaptive Management (186)
- Adaptive Rigour (4)
- Agile & Lean approaches (27)
- Capacity WORKS (3)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (28)
- Design Thinking / HCD / Appropriate tech (36)
- Doing Development Differently (12)
- Global Delivery Initiative (3)
- Human Learning Systems (2)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (12)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (4)
- Other Adaptive approaches (9)
-
Other sectors
(31)
- Government (1)
- Military (2)
- Organizational Management (2)
- Philosophical roots (1)
- Software Development (25)
- Participation (4)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (15)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (20)
- Positive Deviance, 2 loops models, agentic capacity (7)
- Results Based Management (11)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (95)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (49)
-
Cases
(122)
- A4EA - Action for Empowerment and Accountability (3)
- LASER (8)
- PROSPECTS (3)
- SAVI (21)
- Courses (8)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(207)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- Canada - GAC & IDRC (6)
- DANIDA - Danish International Development Agency (2)
- DCED - Donor Committee for Enterprise Development (6)
- Develpment Industry - Private Companies and ThinkTanks (8)
- DFAT (Australia) (9)
- EU (1)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (43)
- G7 (1)
- GIZ (Germany) (14)
- Hivos - Netherlands (2)
- ILO (1)
- Irish Aid (2)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- New Zealand (1)
- NGO Perspectives (33)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (13)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (7)
- SDC - Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (18)
- SIDA - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (5)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (9)
- USAID (30)
- World Bank (12)
-
Geography
(111)
-
Africa
(66)
-
Central Africa
(4)
- Angola (1)
- Cameroon (1)
- Democratic Republic of the Congo (2)
-
Eastern Africa
(27)
- Ethiopia (2)
- Kenya (4)
- Malawi (3)
- Mozambique (8)
- Rwanda (2)
- Somalia (5)
- Somaliland (1)
- South Sudan (1)
- Tanzania (7)
- Uganda (4)
- Zambia (2)
- Zimbabwe (4)
- Northern Africa (3)
-
Southern Africa
(4)
- Lesotho (1)
- South Africa (3)
- Swaziland (1)
- West Africa (46)
-
Central Africa
(4)
-
Americas
(10)
-
Central America
(5)
- Ecuador (2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (4)
-
North America
(3)
- Canada (1)
- United States of America (2)
- South America (4)
-
Central America
(5)
-
Asia
(38)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
- China (1)
-
South-eastern Asia
(12)
- Cambodia (1)
- Indonesia (3)
- Myanmar (6)
- Philippines (2)
- Thailand (1)
- Timor Leste (1)
-
Southern Asia
(23)
- Afghanistan (1)
- Bangladesh (12)
- India (2)
- Nepal (13)
- Pakistan (6)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
-
Europe
(9)
-
Northern Europe
(3)
- United Kingdom (3)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
- Spain (1)
-
Western Europe
(5)
- Germany (3)
- Netherlands (1)
- Switzerland (1)
-
Northern Europe
(3)
- Many geographies (3)
-
Oceania
(5)
- Australia and New Zealand (4)
- Melanesia (1)
-
Africa
(66)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(344)
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (4)
- After Action Reviews (5)
- AI support (5)
- Appreciative Inquiry (1)
- Artificial Intelligence (1)
- Beneficiary Assessment/Engagement (8)
- Capacity Development (2)
- Case Study (4)
- Causal mapping, pahtways, mechanisms (4)
- Circular charts applications (radar, pie, sunburst, spiderweb, orbic, etc) (1)
- Context Monitoring (3)
- Contribution Analysis (5)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Critical Systems Heuristics (3)
- Democratic Evaluation (2)
- Desk based research/lit review (2)
- Developmental Evaluation (8)
- Diaries/Journals/Logs (2)
- Emergent Learning (2)
- Empowerment Evaluation (1)
- Equitable Evaluation (3)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (2)
- Evaluability assessment (2)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (5)
- Ex-post Evaluation (3)
- Feedback Systems (3)
- Focus Group Discussions (1)
- Horizon Scanning / Scenario Planning (5)
- Horizontal Evaluation (1)
- Impact evaluation (9)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (3)
- Indicator-based approaches (4)
- Innovation History (1)
- Innovation System Analysis (4)
- Institutional Histories (2)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (5)
- Logical Framework (5)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (3)
- MEL Bricolage (2)
- MEL in International Development (22)
- Most Significant Change (4)
- Narrative Based Approaches (3)
- Network Analysis (2)
- Outcome Harvesting (10)
- Outcome Mapping (18)
- Participatory Action Research (11)
- Participatory Approaches and Evaluation (10)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (5)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (2)
- Place-based initiatives (3)
- Political Economy Analysis (13)
- Political Settlements Analysis (1)
- Portfolio Approach & Management (13)
- Positive Deviance (4)
- Post Project Evaluations (1)
- Process Tracing (4)
- Public Management Theory (1)
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (4)
- Qualitative data analysis and grounded theory (1)
- Qualitative Impact Assessment Protocol (3)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (8)
- Realist Evaluation (4)
- Relationships weaving and facilitation (6)
- Remote Monitoring (1)
- Rigour (4)
- Rubrics (6)
-
Sense-making
(8)
- SenseMaker (5)
- Social Return on Investment (1)
- Stakeholder analysis (2)
- Stakeholder Feedback (2)
- Strategy testing (3)
- Success Case Method (1)
- Surveys (2)
- Sustainability (3)
- Systemic Change (33)
- Systems Mapping (4)
- Tech 4 MEL (4)
- Theory-based evaluations (4)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (36)
- Trust-based evaluation (/philanthropy /learning) (3)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (3)
- Value for Investment (3)
- Value for Money (8)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (23)
-
Practical
(116)
- Tools (21)
-
Sectors [+]
(320)
- Advocacy and Activism (7)
- Agriculture (2)
- Alternative Development (41)
- Behavioural Change (4)
- Cash Trasfers (1)
- Children (8)
- Citizen Engagement (14)
- Climate Change (6)
- Combatting violent extremism (3)
- Economic development (13)
- Education (6)
- Employment (1)
- Environmental Management (11)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (12)
- Gender (10)
- Governance and Accountability (87)
- Health (4)
- Humanitarian Aid (9)
-
Innovation (in Development)
(34)
- Funding (1)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (17)
- Institutional Reform (5)
- Judicial systems (3)
- Knowledge to Practice (14)
- Locally driven development (17)
- NGOs (22)
- Organizational Change (9)
- Pastoralism (1)
- Peace Building (6)
- Philanthropy/Funding (10)
- Scaling up / Propagating (18)
- Social Accountability (66)
- Social Change (2)
- Social Protection (1)
- Technology (in Development) (19)
- Waste Management (1)
- Youth (3)
Resource type
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(14)
- Between 1970 and 1979 (2)
-
Between 1980 and 1989
(1)
- 1989 (1)
- Between 1990 and 1999 (11)
-
Between 2000 and 2026
(902)
- Between 2000 and 2009 (56)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (594)
- Between 2020 and 2026 (252)
- Unknown (5)