Your search
Results 132 resources
-
The Philippines has a long history of state–society engagement to introduce reforms in government and politics. Forces from civil society and social movements have interfaced with reform-oriented leaders in government on a range of social accountability initiatives – to make governance more responsive, to introduce policy reforms, and to make government more accountable. Several theoretical propositions on which strategic approaches work best for social accountability initiatives have been...
-
Resources that contain evidence of market systems interventions. Recently updated.
-
The primary aim of this research project was to find a conceptually sound definition of systemic change. To do so, it was essential to gain a better understanding of how economies change. The central part of the research work, therefore, was an extended literature review on three bodies of knowledge: evolutionary economics new institutional economics complexity theory There is a growing interest in these bodies of knowledge, combined often called New Economic Thinking, and how they affect...
-
The primary aim of this research project was to find a conceptually sound definition of systemic change. To do so, it was essential to gain a better understanding of how economies change. The central part of the research work, therefore, was an extended literature review on three bodies of knowledge: evolutionary economics, new institutional economics and complexity theory. There is a growing interest in these bodies of knowledge, combined often called New Economic Thinking, and how they...
-
This working paper argues that the growing field of transparency, participation and accountability (TPA) needs a conceptual reboot, to address the limited traction gained so far on the path to accountability. To inform more strategic approaches and to identify the drivers of more sustainable institutional change, fresh analytical work is needed. This paper makes the case for one among several possible strategic approaches by distinguishing between “scaling up” and “taking scale into...
-
We know that gaining access to information and raising citizen voices are not the same as achieving accountability. It is important to look beyond the symptoms of accountability failure, and consider how to tackle the causes. This short research summary discusses different understandings of scale, one important aspect of making transparency and accountability initiatives more strategic. Scale shapes both the causes of accountability failure and the tactics and strategies needed to address it.
-
What are the possibilities of using new digital technologies alongside radio to help ensure that agricultural development projects are farmer-centred, and meet the needs of the rural citizens they intend to serve? This research assesses Farm Radio International’s Listening Post – a model that combines radio and digital technologies with the aim of collecting and aggregating farmer feedback to aid decision-making and adaptive project implementation. The research shows that linking a...
-
Document description This document is currently being finalised and will be published shortly. Please try again soon. Recent research by The BEAM Exchange seeks to understand theoretical perspectives on how market systems approaches can contribute to inclusive economic development through systemic change. It produced three main insights. Economies are evolving systems, building on the mechanisms of variety creation, selection and amplification. Current economic performance, including...
-
In November 2014, the doing development differently community got together in Harvard to discuss what successful development interventions look like. Two years on, our community is broader than aid. It's broader than donors. It's about all organisations delivering change, producing real solutions to real problems that have real impact. It's about building trust, empowering people and promoting sustainability. Over the past two years, the community has been putting these ideas into practice...
-
‘Adaptive management’ is all the rage in international development circles. But to avoid yet another buzzword – we need to learn from the experience of natural resource science.
-
In May 2016, SAVI transitioned into a successor programme – the ‘Engaged Citizens Pillar’ (ECP) of a wider DFID-funded governance reform programme ‘The Partnership to Engage, Reform and Learn’ (PERL). ECP is managed by the same service provider, Palladium, and the same core management team as SAVI, and many of the SAVI front line staff...
-
SAVI, a DFID funded programme implemented by Palladium, is an adaptive programme putting learning and adaptation at the centre of all decision-making. In relation to management and staffing SAVI has established the following approaches to facilitate this: – An adaptive approach to programme management: Full time strategic technical leadership, that works closely with and complements...
-
SAVI, is seeking to support processes of citizen engagement in governance in ways that are effective in influencing reform, and that are able to take on a life of their own without continuing donor support. SAVI is also an adaptive programme, putting learning and adaptation at the centre of all decision-making. Money is used and...
-
SAVI has established its own framework for assessing Value for Money in annual performance – in relation to expenditure, economy, efficiency, effectiveness and equity. Routine tracking and analysis of expenditure and economy ensure that inputs are supplied and services delivered to partners in line with SAVI’s core values, whilst also meeting DFID requirements and competing...
-
SAVI, a DFID funded programme implemented by Palladium, is an adaptive programme, aiming to put learning and adaptation at the centre of all decision-making. Learning and adaptation takes place in SAVI at three levels: the work of partners; the work of SAVI delivery teams; and the enabling environment of the programme as a whole. Achieving...
-
In May 2016, SAVI transitioned into a successor programme – the ‘Engaged Citizens Pillar’ (ECP) of a wider DFID-funded governance reform programme ‘The Partnership to Engage, Reform and Learn’ (PERL). ECP is managed by the same service provider, Palladium, and the same core management team as SAVI, and many of the SAVI front line staff...
-
To improve the value for money and impact of development interventions by promoting the use of better monitoring, evaluation and learning strategies that support development programmes to gather and respond to emergent evidence on the effects of interventions, as well as changes in the development context. The Global Learning for Adpative Management programme will make available technical assistance to DFID, USAID and partners to develop this ‘adaptive management’ approach, as well as build...
Explore
Theme
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(74)
- Adaptive Learning (3)
- Adaptive Management (37)
- Adaptive Rigour (1)
- Agile & Lean approaches (1)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (4)
- Design Thinking / HCD (5)
- Doing Development Differently (4)
- Global Delivery Initiative (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (1)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (1)
- Other Adaptive approaches (2)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (3)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (3)
- Positive Deviance & 2 loops models (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (9)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (13)
- Cases (25)
- Development Actors Perspectives (16)
-
Geography
(17)
-
Africa
(14)
-
Eastern Africa
(2)
- Kenya (1)
- Rwanda (1)
- Somaliland (1)
- Tanzania (1)
- Uganda (2)
-
West Africa
(13)
- Liberia (2)
- Niger (1)
- Nigeria (9)
- Sierra Leone (1)
-
Eastern Africa
(2)
-
Asia
(5)
- South-eastern Asia (3)
-
Southern Asia
(2)
- Bangladesh (1)
- Nepal (1)
-
Africa
(14)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(32)
- Desk based research/lit review (1)
- Developmental Evaluation (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (1)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (2)
- Ex-post Evaluation (1)
- Impact evaluation (1)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (1)
- Indicator-based approaches (2)
- Innovation System Analysis (2)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (2)
- Most Significant Change (1)
- Narrative Based Approaches (1)
- Network Analysis (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (2)
- Outcome Mapping (3)
- Participatory Action Research (1)
- Political Economy Analysis (3)
- Portfolio Management (2)
- Public Management Theory (1)
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (2)
- Qualitative data analysis and grounded theory (1)
- Realist Evaluation (1)
- Scenario Planning (1)
-
Sense-making
(1)
- SenseMaker (1)
- Stakeholder Feedback (1)
- Success Case Method (1)
- Systemic Change (3)
- Theory-based evaluations (2)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (4)
- Value for Investment (1)
- Value for Money (2)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (2)
-
Practical
(16)
- Tools (1)
-
Sectors [+]
(48)
- Advocacy and Activism (1)
- Alternative Development (12)
- Behavioural Change (2)
- Citizen Engagement (4)
- Economic development (2)
- Environmental Management (4)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (1)
- Gender (1)
- Governance and Accountability (11)
- Innovation (in Development) (4)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (2)
- Judicial systems (1)
- Knowledge to Practice (3)
- NGOs (3)
- Peace Building (1)
- Philanthropy (1)
- Scaling up / Propagating (3)
- Social Accountability (7)
- Technology (in Development) (2)
- Waste Management (1)