Your search
Results 201 resources
-
This is a series about Monitoring, Evaluating and Learning (MEL) whether sets of interventions/portfolios are adding more together than each one would produce on their own. In post 1, I pointed to coherence, the new OECD-DAC evaluation criteria as a way to bridge the ambition of bringing bigger change with the MEL world. In post 2, I shared 3 of 4 practical lessons I’ve learned in experimenting with MEL systems and exercises that focus explicitly on interactions of...
-
This report addresses the well-recognized evidence gap1 on the longer-term impacts created by marketdriven programming; specifically, programming influenced by market systems development (MSD) principles. It does so by presenting the findings of an ex-post study conducted three and a half years after the close of USAID’s Feed the Future Senegal Naatal Mbay Activity (hereafter Naatal Mbay) in 2019. It examines the scale and sustainability of changes resulting from Naatal Mbay’s introduction...
-
This is a series about Monitoring, Evaluating and Learning (MEL) whether sets of interventions/portfolios are adding more together than each one would produce on their own. In post 1, I pointed to coherence, the new OECD-DAC evaluation criteria as a way to bridge the ambition of bringing bigger change with the MEL world. In post 2, I shared 3 of 4 practical lessons I’ve learned in experimenting with MEL systems and exercises that focus explicitly on interactions of...
-
Generic, analytic, holistic, orbic, asterisc, escalieric, cephalopodic
-
Programmes that aim to tackle complex societal issues, such as the worst forms of child labour, require rich partnerships that bring together different perspectives. CLARISSA’s consortium partnership adopts an empowerment approach to the interventions we deliver and our ways of working together. Part of this approach involves ongoing reflection and learning about how we work together in our partnership, and how this can be adapted if needed. This learning note focuses on a method used in...
-
For AC practitioners, systems mapping is essential but also difficult. To lessen obstacles, Peter Woodrow proposes a scaffolded approach. An Experiment in “Fast Forwarding” Drawing upon our near-decade work on corruption, we recently decided to try an experiment: we would present “common patterns” of corruption as tentative models to adapt and add to—rather than try to teach people to do systems mapping from scratch. In this teaching experiment, each common pattern would function as a kind...
-
There are a number of options when it comes to using software to help create a logic model. These range from generic word processing tools (Word, Powerpoint, or their Google Doc or Mac equivalents), to software that has been specifically tailored for visualising Theories of Change, like TOCO or Miradi. You should consider what resources you have to invest in software, both in terms of cost and in time to learn and use the features. If you only have a short timeframe and have simple needs,...
-
Check out this video to see what’s inside our new resource: Practitioners' Guidance to Assessing Systems Change, developed by MEL Managers for MEL Managers. (Check out the Guidance here https://bit.ly/MSPMELClinics.) Hear from the authors about which parts they love the most and how this guide challenges MEL managers to assess systems change as an ongoing aspect of implementation, generating feedback that teams need to better understand and catalyze change, for more impact.
-
What problem is the KRT model trying to solve? For workforces that experience continuous staff turnover, the lack of systematic knowledge transfer can often lead to: - Loss of programmatic momentum, - Duplication of efforts and frustration, and - Wasted time and resources. The Knowledge Retention and Transfer (KRT) model provides tools, processes, and practices to individuals, teams, offices, and organizations to improve knowledge handover, which in turn improves efficiency and programmatic and operational learning.
-
What’s in the guide? This new document provides: An overview of the VfI approach, including the conceptual principles and processes underpinning it A worked example of the approach in action: evaluating the Youth Primary Mental Health and Addictions initiative in New Zealand Transferrable learning for others considering the use of the VfI approach.
-
The world changes too much for anyone who is invested in social change work to imagine that this work is linear and predictable. Opportunities come and go, whether caused by a pandemic or political shifts. This much most social movement leaders and activists intuitively understand. But what can be done with this realization? How might movement groups better prepare for moments of opportunity? We want to explore how we can create the changes we want to see by responding to the changes that are outside our control.
-
This study explored how the Outreach Philippines, Inc. (OPI) implements the participatory human development (PHD) approach using transformative communication, in a community-based organization (CBO), Lawag ti Caridad Norte Association (LCNA), in Caridad Norte, Llanera, Nueva Ecija. A phenomenological lens examined the lived experiences of six participants interviewed on December 10 and 13, 2022, and through my own reflections as a community development worker of OPI. Specifically, I analyzed...
-
Addressing 21st century development challenges requires investments in innovation, including the use of new approaches and technologies. Currently, many development organisations prioritise investments in isolated innovation pilots that leverage a specific approach or technology rather than pursuing a strategic approach to expand the organisation’s toolbox with innovations that have proven their comparative advantage over what is currently used. This Working Paper addresses this challenge of...
-
Participatory action research (PAR) is an approach to research that prioritizes the value of experiential knowledge for tackling problems caused by unequal and harmful social systems, and for envisioning and implementing alternatives. PAR involves the participation and leadership of those people experiencing issues, who take action to produce emancipatory social change, through conducting systematic research to generate new knowledge. This Primer sets out key considerations for the design of...
-
How can donors and grantees work together to create effective monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) practices that drive field-wide transformation?
-
Achieving impact through research for development programmes (R4D) requires engagement with diverse stakeholders across the research, development and policy divides. Understanding how such programmes support the emergence of outcomes, therefore, requires a focus on the relational aspects of engagement and collaboration. Increasingly, evaluation of large research collaborations is employing social network analysis (SNA), making use of its relational view of causation. In this paper, we use...
-
The United Kingdom Research and Innovation (UKRI) Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) aimed to address global challenges to achieve the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals through 12 interdisciplinary research hubs. This research documents key lessons learned around working with Theory of Change (ToC) to guide Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) within these complex research for development hubs. Interviews and document reviews were conducted in ten of the research...
-
Research for development (R4D) funding is increasingly expected to demonstrate value for money (VfM). However, the dominance of positivist approaches to evaluating VfM, such as cost-benefit analysis, do not fully account for the complexity of R4D funds and risk undermining efforts to contribute to transformational development. This paper posits an alternative approach to evaluating VfM, using the UK’s Global Challenges Research Fund and the Newton Fund as case studies. Based on a...
-
The complexity of issues addressed by research for development (R4D) requires collaborations between partners from a range of disciplines and cultural contexts. Power asymmetries within such partnerships may obstruct the fair distribution of resources, responsibilities and benefits across all partners. This paper presents a cross-case analysis of five R4D partnership evaluations, their methods and how they unearthed and addressed power asymmetries. It contributes to the field of R4D...
Explore
Theme
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (5)
- After Action Reviews (4)
- Artificial Intelligence (4)
- Beneficiary Assessment/Engagement (3)
- Capacity Development (2)
- Case Study (2)
- Causal Mechanisms (11)
- Circular charts applications (radar, pie, sunburst, spiderweb, orbic, etc) (3)
- Community Led MEL (2)
- Context Monitoring (1)
- Contribution Analysis (7)
- Cost-Benefit Analysis (1)
- Critical Friends (3)
- Critical Systems Heuristics (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (1)
- Diaries (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (1)
- Evaluability assessment (1)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (2)
- Ex-post Evaluation (4)
- Feedback Systems (4)
- Humour (1)
- Impact evaluation (5)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (2)
- Innovation System Analysis (1)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (3)
- Logical Framework (2)
- MEL Bricolage (2)
- MEL in International Development (24)
- Most Significant Change (1)
- Narrative Based Approaches (1)
- Network Analysis (6)
- Outcome Harvesting (2)
- Outcome Mapping (5)
- Participatory Action Research (9)
- Participatory Evaluation (6)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (3)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (2)
- Political Economy Analysis (3)
- Portfolio Management (9)
- Positive Deviance (2)
- Post Project Evaluations (1)
- Power Analysis (1)
- Process Tracing (10)
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (6)
- Realist Evaluation (5)
- Remote Monitoring (1)
- Rigour (3)
- Rubrics (14)
- Rules of Thumb (1)
- Scenario Planning (3)
- SenseMaker (3)
- Stakeholder analysis (1)
- Strategy testing (1)
- Surveys (1)
- Sustainability (4)
- Systemic Change (27)
- Systems Mapping (6)
- Tech 4 MEL (4)
- Theory-based evaluations (6)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (19)
- Value for Investment (2)
- Value for Money (4)
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(84)
- Adaptive Learning (11)
- Adaptive Management (29)
- Adaptive Rigour (2)
- Agile & Lean approaches (1)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (6)
- Design Thinking / HCD (2)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (6)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (1)
- Other sectors (3)
- Participation (4)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (1)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (3)
- Results Based Management (1)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (31)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (5)
- Cases (23)
- Courses (1)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(39)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- China (1)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (7)
- GIZ (Germany) (5)
- Hivos - Netherlands (1)
- Irish Aid (1)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- NGO Perspectives (8)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (2)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (2)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (2)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (5)
- USAID (11)
- World Bank (1)
-
Geography
(28)
-
Africa
(17)
- Central Africa (2)
-
Eastern Africa
(15)
- Kenya (1)
- Malawi (2)
- Mozambique (5)
- Rwanda (2)
- Somalia (3)
- South Sudan (1)
- Tanzania (1)
- Uganda (2)
- Zambia (1)
- Zimbabwe (3)
- Northern Africa (2)
-
Southern Africa
(1)
- South Africa (1)
- West Africa (10)
-
Americas
(6)
-
Central America
(4)
- Ecuador (2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (3)
- South America (4)
-
Central America
(4)
-
Asia
(17)
- South-eastern Asia (2)
-
Southern Asia
(12)
- Bangladesh (7)
- India (1)
- Nepal (7)
- Pakistan (3)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Europe
(2)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
- Spain (1)
-
Western Europe
(1)
- Germany (1)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
-
Africa
(17)
-
Practical
(38)
- Tools (6)
-
Sectors [+]
(63)
- Agriculture (3)
- Alternative Development (6)
- Cash Trasfers (2)
- Children (8)
- Citizen Engagement (1)
- Climate Change (2)
- Economic development (6)
- Education (3)
- Employment (1)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (2)
- Gender (2)
- Governance and Accountability (13)
- Health (1)
- Humanitarian Aid (2)
- Innovation (in Development) (4)
- Knowledge to Practice (3)
- Locally driven development (3)
- Organizational Change (3)
- Peace Building (2)
- Private Sector Development (1)
- Research for Development (R4D) (4)
- Scaling up / Propagating (4)
- Social Accountability (1)
- Social Protection (1)
Resource type
- Blog Post (40)
- Book (5)
- Book Section (1)
- Conference Paper (1)
- Journal Article (36)
- Magazine Article (4)
- Manuscript (1)
- Presentation (2)
- Radio Broadcast (1)
- Report (97)
- Thesis (2)
- Video Recording (7)
- Web Page (4)