Your search
Results 316 resources
-
The Cynefin Centre’s Citizen Engagement & Democratic Innovation programme provides tools for collective sense-making in the areas of community development and youth work; civic engagement and democratic innovation; collaborative service/policy design and evaluation; housing/tenant engagement; futures and planning; shared learning and peer to peer knowledge exchange.
-
This publication provides an overview of the impetus for the Equitable Evaluation Framework™ (EEF) and attempts to document early moments and first steps of engagement with U.S. philanthropic institutions — most often their research, evaluation and learning staff — whom we refer to as foundation partners throughout this publication. The themes shared in this publication surfaced through conversations with a group of foundation staff who have been part of the Equitable Evaluation Project, now...
-
This Toolkit This Toolkit presents an approach to network evaluation that is designed for network coordinators. This Toolkit provides guidance for network coordinators on how to: • More effectively use information they are already collecting as part of their routine coordination duties; • Collect other useful data that would support their network’s health and development; • Integrate network evaluation tasks into network activities, like convenings, to streamline the process; • Use data to...
-
This Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document is written for Small Foundation network partners. It accompanies Network Partner Evaluation Toolkit, which outlines four evaluation tools that Small Foundation is encouraging, and supporting, its network partners to use to improve their operations and, ultimately, increase their impact. This FAQ document answers typical questions about these evaluation tools and provides additional detailed recommendations for how network coordinators can...
-
Development cooperation has spent decades wrangling over the merits, evidence, and implications of what we may term “the learning hypothesis”: the idea that increased knowledge by development organisations must logically lead to increased effectiveness in the performance of their development activities. Organisations of all stripes have built research and monitoring and evaluation (M&E) departments, adopted a multitude of knowledge management systems and tools, and tinkered with...
-
Plus a stack of 40+ AI tools we use at Exponential View
-
The operating manual we wish we'd had
-
When asserting the value of theory-based methods, you often here words like “black boxes” and “causal mechanisms.” These are commonly…
-
In this final blog in the series, I want to look at the potential value of rubrics. While evaluability assessments can help us to…
-
In my last blog on theory-based Monitoring Evaluation and Learning (MEL), I explained why relationships matter, and how to assess change…
-
Abstract Background: Program logic is one of the most used tools by the public policy evaluator. There is, however, little explanation in the evaluation literature about the logical foundations of program logic or discussion of how it may be determined if a program is logical. This paper was born on a long journey that started with program logic and ended with the logic of evaluation. Consistent throughout was the idea that the discipline of program evaluation is a pragmatic one, concerned...
-
Development and radical uncertaintyFeinstein, O. - 2020 - Development in Practice, 30(8), 1105–1113
Development strategies, programmes and projects are designed making assumptions concerning several variables such as future prices of outputs and inputs, exchange rates and productivity growth. However, knowledge about the future is limited. Uncertainty prevails. The usual approach to deal with uncertainty is to reduce it to risk. Uncertainty is perceived as a negative factor that should and can be eliminated. This article presents an alternative approach which recognises that radical...
-
The term After Action Review (AAR) is becoming more common in the world of development evaluation, particularly in programmes that focus on evaluation as a formative learning process. As structured and facilitated learning moments, AARs take many shapes always built to support a specific team in a specific moment on their journey. Across such a diversity of practice how do we understand the evolution of the AAR as a method with an action research orientation? Being mindful always of the...
-
A-ha! A moment etched in my memory: 20 or so researchers were...
-
A recent conversation with a good governance programme in Myanmar tried to identify its underlying rules of thumb. Was that a good idea?
-
What can middle-level theory do? Middle-level theory (MLT) has several uses in development planning and evaluation. It helps predict whether a programme can be expected to work in a new setting. It offers insights into what design features are needed for success. It provides invaluable information for monitoring to see if the programme is on track and to fix problems that arise. It reveals the causal processes and related assumptions to be tested in an evaluation and helps identify...
-
This paper lays out a series of steps people can take to create the new systems we need to meet shared, public challenges. Systems are ubiquitous and powerful. We rely on them to support our daily lives: every time we turn on a tap, flick a switch for electricity, drop our child at school, jump on a bus or visit a doctor we rely on a wider system. There is a widespread sense, among decision makers and citizens that in the coming decades society will need not just new products, software and...
-
What is Rapid Action Learning and how was it developed?Sanitation Learning Hub - 2020, September 22
To celebrate the publication of our latest Frontiers of Sanitation, we had a series of conversations with our colleagues and partners on our work on Rapid Action Learning so far. To download the publication in full, head to https://sanitationlearninghub.org/res...
-
Monitoring and Evaluation needs to be different to support the new generation of 'adaptive programmes' in aid. 4 M&E specialists in Tanzania explain how.
-
A smart new report explores how a good idea - theories of change - is distorted by the way it is implemented in the aid sector
Explore
Theme
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (6)
- After Action Reviews (5)
- AI support (17)
- Artificial Intelligence (7)
- Beneficiary Assessment/Engagement (3)
- Capacity Development (3)
- Case Study (2)
- Causal mapping, pahtways, mechanisms (17)
- Circular charts applications (radar, pie, sunburst, spiderweb, orbic, etc) (4)
- Community Led MEL (2)
- Context Monitoring (3)
- Contribution Analysis (9)
- Conversation Based Reporting (2)
- Cost-Benefit Analysis (1)
- Critical Friends (3)
- Critical Systems Heuristics (1)
- Democratic Evaluation (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (1)
- Diaries/Journals/Logs (3)
- Emergent Learning (3)
- Equitable Evaluation (9)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (1)
- Evaluability assessment (2)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (2)
- Ex-post Evaluation (5)
- Feedback Systems (4)
- Future Thinking / Horizon Scanning / Scenario Planning (6)
- Humour (1)
- Impact evaluation (8)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (2)
- Innovation System Analysis (1)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (4)
- Logical Framework (2)
- MEL Bricolage (3)
- MEL in International Development (42)
- Most Significant Change (3)
- Narrative Based Approaches (2)
- Network Analysis (6)
- Outcome Harvesting (6)
- Outcome Mapping (6)
- Participatory Action Research (12)
- Participatory Approaches and Evaluation (9)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (3)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (2)
- Place-based initiatives (2)
- Polarities (1)
- Political Economy Analysis (7)
- Political Settlements Analysis (1)
- Portfolio Approach & Management (13)
- Positive Deviance (3)
- Post Project Evaluations (1)
- Power Analysis (1)
- Process Tracing (11)
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (1)
- Qualitative data analysis and grounded theory (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (6)
- Realist Evaluation (5)
- Regenerative Evaluation (1)
- Relationships weaving and facilitation (4)
- Remote Monitoring (1)
- Rigour (9)
- Rubrics (17)
- Rules of Thumb (1)
-
Sense-making
(10)
- SenseMaker (4)
- Stakeholder analysis (3)
- Strategy testing (2)
- Surveys (1)
- Sustainability (4)
- Systemic Change (46)
- Systems Mapping (8)
- Tech 4 MEL (5)
- Theory-based evaluations (7)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (34)
- Trust-based evaluation (/philanthropy /learning) (7)
- Value for Investment (6)
- Value for Money (6)
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(123)
- Adaptive/Emergent Learning (17)
- Adaptive Management (39)
- Adaptive Rigour (2)
- Agile & Lean approaches (4)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (7)
- Design Thinking / HCD / Appropriate tech (2)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (6)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (1)
- Other sectors (7)
- Participation (6)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (2)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (6)
- Positive Deviance, 2 loops models, agentic capacity (2)
- Results Based Management (1)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (48)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (8)
- Cases (40)
- Courses (1)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(62)
- Adaptive Management orgs (1)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- China (1)
- Develpment Industry - Private Companies and ThinkTanks (4)
- EU (1)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (12)
- GIZ (Germany) (5)
- Hivos - Netherlands (1)
- Irish Aid (1)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- NGO/CSO Perspectives (14)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (2)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (3)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (10)
- USAID (13)
- World Bank (2)
-
Geography
(39)
-
Africa
(21)
- Central Africa (3)
-
Eastern Africa
(18)
- Kenya (2)
- Malawi (3)
- Mozambique (5)
- Rwanda (2)
- Somalia (4)
- South Sudan (1)
- Tanzania (2)
- Uganda (4)
- Zambia (3)
- Zimbabwe (4)
- Northern Africa (3)
-
Southern Africa
(3)
- Lesotho (1)
- South Africa (1)
- Swaziland (1)
- West Africa (13)
-
Americas
(7)
-
Central America
(4)
- Ecuador (2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (3)
- North America (1)
- South America (4)
-
Central America
(4)
-
Asia
(20)
- South-eastern Asia (2)
-
Southern Asia
(15)
- Bangladesh (10)
- India (1)
- Nepal (9)
- Pakistan (3)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Europe
(4)
-
Northern Europe
(2)
- United Kingdom (2)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
- Spain (1)
-
Western Europe
(1)
- Germany (1)
-
Northern Europe
(2)
- Oceania (2)
-
Africa
(21)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (1)
-
Practical
(51)
- Tools (14)
-
Sectors [+]
(108)
- Advocacy and Activism (3)
- Agriculture (3)
- Alternative Development (11)
- Cash Trasfers (2)
- Children (9)
- Citizen Engagement (2)
- Climate Change (8)
- Economic development (7)
- Education (5)
- Employment (1)
- Environmental Management (1)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (3)
- Gender (3)
- Governance and Accountability (18)
- Health (2)
- Humanitarian Aid (3)
- Innovation (in Development) (6)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (2)
- Knowledge to Practice (4)
- Locally driven development (5)
- NGOs (1)
- Organizational Change (3)
- Peace Building (2)
- Philanthropy/Funding (17)
- Private Sector Development (1)
- Research for Development (R4D) (5)
- Scaling up / Propagating (6)
- Social Accountability (2)
- Social Change (1)
- Social Protection (4)
- Technology (in Development) (2)
- Youth (1)
Resource type
- Blog Post (53)
- Book (12)
- Book Section (12)
- Conference Paper (1)
- Journal Article (63)
- Magazine Article (4)
- Manuscript (1)
- Presentation (4)
- Radio Broadcast (1)
- Report (147)
- Software (1)
- Thesis (2)
- Video Recording (8)
- Web Page (7)