Your search
Results 922 resources
-
In Building Better Systems, we introduced four keys to unlock system innovation: purpose and power, relationships and resource flows. These four keys make up a set. Systems are often hard to change because power, relationships, and resource flows are locked together in a reinforcing pattern to serve the system’s current purpose. Systems start to change fundamentally when this pattern is disrupted and opened up so that a new configuration can emerge, serving a new purpose. In this article...
-
The present literature review was conducted in order to investigate the role of Complexity Leadership Theory (CLT) in modern public administration. We use data from different academic articles to decompose the value within the framework of this theoretical perspective. In addition to explaining how extend, Complexity Leadership Theory (CLT) is crucial in the “information age” and its main factors will be the main priorities of the study. Traditional top-down conceptions of leadership are at...
-
This systems change rubric describes different performance levels according to various systems elements, such as policy (formal rules), practices and relationships and connections. Programmes can use the rubric to assess the performance of systems to help decide where and how to intervene, or during and post-implementation to conduct progress assessments, and assess the effectiveness of interventions and type, breadth and depth of systems change. Each performance level description...
-
A step-by-step guide on how to develop a Transformative Theory of Change, for innovation projects, programmes and organisations working on systems transformation. The MOTION project was initiated with one key question in mind: how can we help projects and organisations be more transformative, using the framework and concept provided by the multi-level perspective? And what kind of tools, methods and frameworks can we co-design that translate scientific concepts into practises relevant for...
-
Based on experience from running Sensemaking workshops for UNDP offices and government partners, the Asia-Pacific Regional Innovation Centre developed the Sensemaking Preparation Guide and Facilitator Guide to share its knowledge with teams and organization that are interested in using the Sensemaking process.
-
Executive Summary Understanding how civil society can get government to respond to their needs, preferences and demands, and deliver goods and services to citizens is a central concern in social accountability initiatives. It is widely argued that sanctions make a key difference to service delivery outcomes, and that without them, transparency and accountability interventions are less likely to be effective and less likely to be sustainable (Anderson et al., 2020; Arugay, 2016; Fox, 2020;...
-
DT Global is proud to introduce our new Guidance Note: Practical Introduction to Adaptive Management There is a growing consensus around adaptive management as an effective (even necessary) approach when programs are tackling complex development problems. While there is no standard definition of adaptive management, there is general agreement that such programs need to routinely engage with and respond to program context; constantly test what works in that context; and adjust approaches,...
-
In recent years concepts such as market or sector transformation and systems change have become part of the mainstream development discourse. The aim is to address root causes that undermine the performance of sectors (e.g. agriculture, mining or energy) in order to achieve long-term and widescale impact. It seems, however, that it is not always clear to everyone using these concepts what is meant with these concepts and how it differs from ‘business as usual.’ Adopting a systems change...
-
Our new guide provides practical advice to help any organisation working in public service apply the Human Learning Systems approach to their work. In doing so, they will be better equipped to explore, learn and respond to the unique strengths and needs of each person, family and community they serve.
-
This paper presents the case for systemic organisational change in the humanitarian system. The paper firstly shows that that organisational learning has tended to reinforce existing ways of working and has not been able to shift a culture that values action over reflection. As a result, the rest of the paper asks about the most significant changes in the humanitarian sector
-
CLARISSA (Child Labour: Action-Research-Innovation in South and South-eastern Asia) is a participatory evidence and innovation generating programme. We are generating evidence on the drivers of the worst forms of child labour (WFCL) and exploring how to address them through participatory Action Research (PAR) with children and other stakeholders in the leather supply chain in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Our main intervention modality is Systemic Action Research (SAR) (Burns, 2007), of which life...
-
Capturing the impact of community-led work The Centre for Public Impact, Dusseldorp Forum, and Hands Up Mallee have been exploring how stories can be used to more effectively communicate the impact of community-led systems change work. Community-led place based initiatives are modelling new ways of working - shifting away from top down, program-focussed approaches towards an approach grounded in systems thinking and community-led innovations. However, while these stories of change are...
-
Trust-based philanthropy is a holistic approach that requires alignment in a grantmaking organization’s four interrelated areas: 1) culture, 2) structure, 3) leadership, and 4) practices. This tool is designed to help funders at various stages of the trust-based journey examine how trust shows up across your organization, and identify areas that may need more inquiry, refinement, or deepening. This is intended as a reflection tool rather than a prescriptive tool.
-
The Outcomes Stars are a suite of evidence-based outcomes measurement and keywork tools, which drive an ‘enabling help’ approach to service delivery. They support a person-centred, collaborative and trauma informed approach and give service users, workers, managers and commissioners vital information about needs and progress. Since the first version was published in 2006, the unique features of the Outcomes Star contributed to its popularity and widespread use, with over 1,000 organisations...
-
This document is a an Introductory Toolkit for for civil servants. It is one component of a suite of documents that aims to act as a springboard into systems thinking for civil servants unfamiliar with this approach. These documents introduce a small sample of systems thinking concepts and tools, chosen due to their accessibility and alignment to civil service policy development, but which is by no means comprehensive. They are intended to act as a first step towards using systems thinking...
-
The UNDP Accelerator Labs were designed as an agile and dynamic Network to allow communication and information transfer between 91 Accelerator Labs in 115 countries, and with the global innovation ecosystem, UNDP as a whole, and thousands of partners including grassroots innovators and their communities. The accumulated knowledge of this Network creates new pathways to the solutions that hold the key to sustainable development problems. What it looked like and how it unfolded last year will...
-
USAID’s Bureau for Policy, Planning and Learning (PPL) and its support mechanism, LEARN, have developed a Collaborating, Learning, and Adapting (CLA) Framework and Maturity tool to help USAID missions think more deliberately about how to plan for and implement CLA approaches that fit the mission’s context and assist them in achieving their development objectives. While the tool is intended primarily for USAID audiences to be used in participatory self-assessment workshops, the CLA Framework...
-
USAID’s Bureau for Policy, Planning and Learning (PPL) and its support mechanism, LEARN, have developed a Collaborating, Learning, and Adapting (CLA) Framework and Maturity tool to help USAID missions think more deliberately about how to plan for and implement CLA approaches that fit the mission’s context and assist them in achieving their development objectives. While the tool is intended primarily for USAID audiences to be used in participatory self-assessment workshops, the CLA Framework...
-
Although collaborating, learning, and adapting (CLA) are not new to USAID and its implementing partners, they often do not happen regularly or systematically and are not intentionally resourced. The CLA Framework above identifies components and subcomponents to help you think more deliberately about what approach to CLA might be best tailored to your organizational or project context. The framework recognizes the diversity of what CLA can look like in various organizations and projects while...
Explore
Theme
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(465)
- Adaptive/Emergent Learning (45)
- Adaptive Management (186)
- Adaptive Rigour (4)
- Agile & Lean approaches (27)
- Capacity WORKS (3)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (28)
- Design Thinking / HCD / Appropriate tech (36)
- Doing Development Differently (12)
- Global Delivery Initiative (3)
- Human Learning Systems (2)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (12)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (4)
- Other Adaptive approaches (9)
-
Other sectors
(31)
- Government (1)
- Military (2)
- Organizational Management (2)
- Philosophical roots (1)
- Software Development (25)
- Participation (4)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (15)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (20)
- Positive Deviance, 2 loops models, agentic capacity (7)
- Results Based Management (11)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (95)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (49)
-
Cases
(122)
- A4EA - Action for Empowerment and Accountability (3)
- LASER (8)
- PROSPECTS (3)
- SAVI (21)
- Courses (8)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(208)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- Canada - GAC & IDRC (6)
- DANIDA - Danish International Development Agency (2)
- DCED - Donor Committee for Enterprise Development (6)
- Develpment Industry - Private Companies and ThinkTanks (8)
- DFAT (Australia) (9)
- EU (1)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (43)
- G7 (1)
- GIZ (Germany) (14)
- Hivos - Netherlands (2)
- ILO (1)
- Irish Aid (2)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- New Zealand (1)
- NGO/CSO Perspectives (34)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (13)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (7)
- SDC - Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (18)
- SIDA - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (5)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (9)
- USAID (30)
- World Bank (12)
-
Geography
(111)
-
Africa
(66)
-
Central Africa
(4)
- Angola (1)
- Cameroon (1)
- Democratic Republic of the Congo (2)
-
Eastern Africa
(27)
- Ethiopia (2)
- Kenya (4)
- Malawi (3)
- Mozambique (8)
- Rwanda (2)
- Somalia (5)
- Somaliland (1)
- South Sudan (1)
- Tanzania (7)
- Uganda (4)
- Zambia (2)
- Zimbabwe (4)
- Northern Africa (3)
-
Southern Africa
(4)
- Lesotho (1)
- South Africa (3)
- Swaziland (1)
- West Africa (46)
-
Central Africa
(4)
-
Americas
(10)
-
Central America
(5)
- Ecuador (2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (4)
-
North America
(3)
- Canada (1)
- United States of America (2)
- South America (4)
-
Central America
(5)
-
Asia
(38)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
- China (1)
-
South-eastern Asia
(12)
- Cambodia (1)
- Indonesia (3)
- Myanmar (6)
- Philippines (2)
- Thailand (1)
- Timor Leste (1)
-
Southern Asia
(23)
- Afghanistan (1)
- Bangladesh (12)
- India (2)
- Nepal (13)
- Pakistan (6)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
-
Europe
(9)
-
Northern Europe
(3)
- United Kingdom (3)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
- Spain (1)
-
Western Europe
(5)
- Germany (3)
- Netherlands (1)
- Switzerland (1)
-
Northern Europe
(3)
- Many geographies (3)
-
Oceania
(5)
- Australia and New Zealand (4)
- Melanesia (1)
-
Africa
(66)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(345)
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (4)
- After Action Reviews (5)
- AI support (6)
- Appreciative Inquiry (1)
- Artificial Intelligence (1)
- Beneficiary Assessment/Engagement (8)
- Capacity Development (2)
- Case Study (4)
- Causal mapping, pahtways, mechanisms (4)
- Circular charts applications (radar, pie, sunburst, spiderweb, orbic, etc) (1)
- Context Monitoring (3)
- Contribution Analysis (5)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Critical Systems Heuristics (3)
- Democratic Evaluation (2)
- Desk based research/lit review (2)
- Developmental Evaluation (8)
- Diaries/Journals/Logs (2)
- Emergent Learning (2)
- Empowerment Evaluation (1)
- Equitable Evaluation (3)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (2)
- Evaluability assessment (2)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (5)
- Ex-post Evaluation (3)
- Feedback Systems (3)
- Focus Group Discussions (1)
- Horizon Scanning / Scenario Planning (5)
- Horizontal Evaluation (1)
- Impact evaluation (9)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (3)
- Indicator-based approaches (4)
- Innovation History (1)
- Innovation System Analysis (4)
- Institutional Histories (2)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (5)
- Logical Framework (5)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (3)
- MEL Bricolage (2)
- MEL in International Development (22)
- Most Significant Change (4)
- Narrative Based Approaches (3)
- Network Analysis (2)
- Outcome Harvesting (10)
- Outcome Mapping (18)
- Participatory Action Research (11)
- Participatory Approaches and Evaluation (10)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (5)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (2)
- Place-based initiatives (3)
- Political Economy Analysis (13)
- Political Settlements Analysis (1)
- Portfolio Approach & Management (13)
- Positive Deviance (4)
- Post Project Evaluations (1)
- Process Tracing (4)
- Public Management Theory (1)
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (4)
- Qualitative data analysis and grounded theory (1)
- Qualitative Impact Assessment Protocol (3)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (8)
- Realist Evaluation (4)
- Relationships weaving and facilitation (6)
- Remote Monitoring (1)
- Rigour (4)
- Rubrics (6)
-
Sense-making
(8)
- SenseMaker (5)
- Social Return on Investment (1)
- Stakeholder analysis (2)
- Stakeholder Feedback (2)
- Strategy testing (3)
- Success Case Method (1)
- Surveys (2)
- Sustainability (3)
- Systemic Change (33)
- Systems Mapping (4)
- Tech 4 MEL (4)
- Theory-based evaluations (4)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (36)
- Trust-based evaluation (/philanthropy /learning) (3)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (3)
- Value for Investment (3)
- Value for Money (8)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (23)
-
Practical
(116)
- Tools (21)
-
Sectors [+]
(321)
- Advocacy and Activism (7)
- Agriculture (2)
- Alternative Development (41)
- Behavioural Change (4)
- Cash Trasfers (1)
- Children (8)
- Citizen Engagement (14)
- Climate Change (6)
- Combatting violent extremism (3)
- Economic development (13)
- Education (6)
- Employment (1)
- Environmental Management (11)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (12)
- Gender (10)
- Governance and Accountability (87)
- Health (4)
- Humanitarian Aid (9)
-
Innovation (in Development)
(34)
- Funding (1)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (17)
- Institutional Reform (5)
- Judicial systems (3)
- Knowledge to Practice (14)
- Locally driven development (17)
- NGOs (23)
- Organizational Change (9)
- Pastoralism (1)
- Peace Building (6)
- Philanthropy/Funding (10)
- Scaling up / Propagating (18)
- Social Accountability (66)
- Social Change (2)
- Social Protection (1)
- Technology (in Development) (20)
- Waste Management (1)
- Youth (3)
Resource type
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(14)
- Between 1970 and 1979 (2)
-
Between 1980 and 1989
(1)
- 1989 (1)
- Between 1990 and 1999 (11)
-
Between 2000 and 2026
(903)
- Between 2000 and 2009 (56)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (594)
- Between 2020 and 2026 (253)
- Unknown (5)