Your search
Results 869 resources
-
Governance reform is about government and citizens working together in more responsive, inclusive and accountable ways for the benefit of citizens. More responsive, inclusive and accountable attitudes and behaviour on the part of government and non-government stakeholders are the critical factors which lead to meaningful reform processes, and replicate and sustain reforms beyond the lifetime...
-
SAVI as a programme does not directly work with state governments – but we work in close conjunction with sister programmes who are supporting state governments on governance and sector reforms. SAVI supports non-government and SHoA partners to play their part in promoting more responsive, inclusive and accountable state governance delivering better services for citizens....
-
SAVI supports citizen engagement in governance through a facilitated partnership approach, in contrast to the usual approach of grants to civil society organisations (CSOs). The overall aim is to facilitate and support working relationships and processes of reform that are home-grown, self-sustaining and, after initial engagement, not dependent on external support. Our way of working...
-
SAVI’s theory of change is a simple, practical guide that staff and partners use to plan and to monitor change – as well as to reflect on and enhance their own effectiveness. It sets out broad stages of attitude and behaviour change over time to facilitate effective citizen engagement in governance processes, systems and structures....
-
Thinking and acting politically is central to the SAVI programme. We support staff and partners to analyse the power relations that shape change in their state, and to use this knowledge to inform their decision-making. This includes decisions made by SAVI state teams relating to the issues and partners they engage with and support, and...
-
SAVI aims to facilitate replicable and sustainable processes of citizen engagement in governance. The programme in each state is locally defined, flexible and adaptive, and results are not predictable in advance. Standardised monitoring tools are not applicable, and consequently we have evolved our tools and frameworks during the programme through processes of learning by doing....
-
SAVI state teams provide support to CS groups to become more effective agents of citizens’ voice and public accountability, through a variety of mutually reinforcing interventions. These include: hands-on support to demonstration civil society Advocacy Partnerships (APs) facilitating working partnerships between civil society APs, SHoAs, and the media brokering working relationships between all of these...
-
We promote attention to gender equality and social inclusion in all of our engagement with CS groups, the media and SHoAs, and in all of the issues and processes they work on. In all the states we work in, we also support partners to focus on some issues and form some partnerships and networks which...
-
The overall aim of SAVI engagement with the media is for media representation of citizens’ interests to become normal, and play its part in helping state governments to be more responsive, inclusive and accountable to their citizens. Media partners – individual media personnel and selected media houses – are supported to be more effective agents...
-
The overall aim of SAVI engagement with SHoAs is to promote lasting reforms that are not dependent on external funding and which promote an increasingly more responsive and accountable relationship between Nigerian state governments and their citizens. SHoAs are supported to be more effective agents of citizen voice and public accountability, demanding better performance from...
-
The Theory of Change approach demands a radical shift towards more and better learning in development thinking and practice, creating a productive and much-needed space for critical reflection.
-
This guidance note focuses on the utility of, and guidance for, evaluability assessment before undertaking an impact evaluation. The primary audience for this guidance note is evaluators conducting an evaluability assessment for impact evaluation. The secondary audience is people commissioning or managing an evaluability assessment for impact evaluation, as well as funders of an impact evaluation. Sections one and two provide an overview of evaluability assessment and how it can be used...
-
USAID’s Bureau for Economic Growth, Education, and the Environment/Office of Forestry and Biodiversity (E3/FAB) launched the five-year Measuring Impact program (MI) to help strengthen USAID’s biodiversity programs by building the capacity of the Agency to design, monitor, and evaluate effective programs and by enhancing the evidence base that informs programming decisions. A core programmatic strategy of MI is to “Improve Biodiversity Conservation Approaches” with the life-of-project (LOP)...
-
In this third and final think piece exploring the role of grassroots organizations and movements for state accountability (find the previous pieces here and here), the author Mary Joyce, proposes new thinking about how funders and other external organizations can best support social movements. Funding and other support for popular organizations and movements is not straightforward, and there are potential risks and distortions involved. Interested supporters need to clearly identify and...
-
This Think Piece describes social movements pursuing government accountability and the challenges and opportunities to supporting them.
Explore
Theme
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(433)
- Adaptive Learning (44)
- Adaptive Management (178)
- Adaptive Rigour (4)
- Agile & Lean approaches (25)
- Capacity WORKS (3)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (27)
- Design Thinking / HCD (34)
- Doing Development Differently (12)
- Global Delivery Initiative (3)
- Human Learning Systems (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (12)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (4)
- Other Adaptive approaches (9)
-
Other sectors
(6)
- Government (1)
- Military (2)
- Organizational Management (2)
- Philosophical roots (1)
- Participation (4)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (15)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (18)
- Positive Deviance & 2 loops models (6)
- Results Based Management (11)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (77)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (47)
- Cases (115)
- Courses (8)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(193)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- Canada - GAC & IDRC (6)
- DANIDA - Danish International Development Agency (2)
- DCED - Donor Committee for Enterprise Development (6)
- Develpment Industry - Private Companies and ThinkTanks (8)
- DFAT (Australia) (9)
- EU (1)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (40)
- G7 (1)
- GIZ (Germany) (14)
- Hivos - Netherlands (2)
- ILO (1)
- Irish Aid (2)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- New Zealand (1)
- NGO Perspectives (29)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (13)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (6)
- SDC - Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (18)
- SIDA - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (5)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (6)
- USAID (28)
- World Bank (11)
-
Geography
(107)
-
Africa
(65)
-
Central Africa
(4)
- Angola (1)
- Cameroon (1)
- Democratic Republic of the Congo (2)
-
Eastern Africa
(26)
- Ethiopia (2)
- Kenya (3)
- Malawi (2)
- Mozambique (8)
- Rwanda (2)
- Somalia (4)
- Somaliland (1)
- South Sudan (1)
- Tanzania (6)
- Uganda (3)
- Zambia (1)
- Zimbabwe (3)
- Northern Africa (2)
-
Southern Africa
(3)
- South Africa (3)
- West Africa (45)
-
Central Africa
(4)
-
Americas
(10)
-
Central America
(5)
- Ecuador (2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (4)
-
North America
(3)
- Canada (1)
- United States of America (2)
- South America (4)
-
Central America
(5)
-
Asia
(38)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
- China (1)
-
South-eastern Asia
(12)
- Cambodia (1)
- Indonesia (3)
- Myanmar (6)
- Philippines (2)
- Thailand (1)
- Timor Leste (1)
-
Southern Asia
(23)
- Afghanistan (1)
- Bangladesh (12)
- India (2)
- Nepal (13)
- Pakistan (6)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
-
Europe
(8)
-
Northern Europe
(2)
- United Kingdom (2)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
- Spain (1)
-
Western Europe
(5)
- Germany (3)
- Netherlands (1)
- Switzerland (1)
-
Northern Europe
(2)
- Many geographies (3)
-
Oceania
(3)
- Australia and New Zealand (2)
- Melanesia (1)
-
Africa
(65)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(303)
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (4)
- After Action Reviews (5)
- Appreciative Inquiry (1)
- Beneficiary Assessment/Engagement (8)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Case Study (4)
- Causal Mechanisms (3)
- Circular charts applications (radar, pie, sunburst, spiderweb, orbic, etc) (1)
- Context Monitoring (2)
- Contribution Analysis (5)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Critical Systems Heuristics (3)
- Democratic Evaluation (2)
- Desk based research/lit review (2)
- Developmental Evaluation (8)
- Diaries (1)
- Empowerment Evaluation (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (2)
- Evaluability assessment (2)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (5)
- Ex-post Evaluation (3)
- Feedback Systems (3)
- Focus Group Discussions (1)
- Horizontal Evaluation (1)
- Impact evaluation (7)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (3)
- Indicator-based approaches (4)
- Innovation History (1)
- Innovation System Analysis (4)
- Institutional Histories (2)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (5)
- Logical Framework (5)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (3)
- MEL Bricolage (1)
- MEL in International Development (14)
- Most Significant Change (4)
- Narrative Based Approaches (2)
- Network Analysis (2)
- Outcome Harvesting (9)
- Outcome Mapping (18)
- Participatory Action Research (11)
- Participatory Evaluation (10)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (5)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (2)
- Political Economy Analysis (12)
- Political Settlements Analysis (1)
- Portfolio Management (11)
- Positive Deviance (4)
- Post Project Evaluations (1)
- Process Tracing (3)
- Public Management Theory (1)
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (4)
- Qualitative data analysis and grounded theory (1)
- Qualitative Impact Assessment Protocol (3)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (8)
- Realist Evaluation (4)
- Remote Monitoring (1)
- Rigour (2)
- Rubrics (6)
- Scenario Planning (3)
-
Sense-making
(7)
- SenseMaker (4)
- Social Return on Investment (1)
- Stakeholder analysis (2)
- Stakeholder Feedback (2)
- Strategy testing (3)
- Success Case Method (1)
- Surveys (2)
- Sustainability (3)
- Systemic Change (26)
- Systems Mapping (4)
- Tech 4 MEL (4)
- Theory-based evaluations (4)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (32)
- Trust-based evaluation (/philanthropy /learning) (2)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (3)
- Value for Investment (4)
- Value for Money (7)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (23)
-
Practical
(106)
- Tools (14)
-
Sectors [+]
(297)
- Advocacy and Activism (6)
- Agriculture (2)
- Alternative Development (39)
- Behavioural Change (4)
- Cash Trasfers (1)
- Children (8)
- Citizen Engagement (14)
- Climate Change (5)
- Combatting violent extremism (3)
- Economic development (12)
- Education (4)
- Employment (1)
- Environmental Management (11)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (12)
- Gender (9)
- Governance and Accountability (83)
- Health (4)
- Humanitarian Aid (9)
-
Innovation (in Development)
(31)
- Funding (1)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (17)
- Institutional Reform (5)
- Judicial systems (3)
- Knowledge to Practice (14)
- Locally driven development (17)
- NGOs (22)
- Organizational Change (9)
- Pastoralism (1)
- Peace Building (6)
- Philanthropy (3)
- Scaling up / Propagating (18)
- Social Accountability (65)
- Technology (in Development) (19)
- Waste Management (1)
Resource type
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(14)
- Between 1970 and 1979 (2)
-
Between 1980 and 1989
(1)
- 1989 (1)
- Between 1990 and 1999 (11)
-
Between 2000 and 2025
(852)
- Between 2000 and 2009 (56)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (589)
- Between 2020 and 2025 (207)
- Unknown (3)