Your search
Results 65 resources
-
Unexamined and unjustified assumptions are the Achilles’ heel of development programs. In this paper, we describe an evaluation capacity building (ECB) approach designed to help community development practitioners work more effectively with assumptions through the intentional infusion of evaluative thinking (ET) into the program planning, monitoring, and evaluation process. We focus specifically on one component of our ET promotion approach involving the creation and analysis of theory of...
-
The Biodiversity How-To Guide 2: Using Results Chains to Depict Theories of Change in USAID Biodiversity Programming is the second in a series of three guides that provide in-depth guidance on key tools and practices to support design teams as they design and manage biodiversity programs within the Program Cycle and in accordance with the USAID Biodiversity Policy. It builds off the situation model guide to help design teams clearly state the expected results and assumptions behind the...
-
Building on experience from the CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems implemented by WorldFish in the Visayas and Mindanao regions of the Philippines, known as the VisMin Hub, we describe the development and evolution of a monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system emerging from the facilitated action-reflection cycles of testing and adopting theories of change carried out with community partners through participatory action research (PAR). The former guides our community...
-
• For some interventions, tight and testable theories of change are not appropriate – for example, in fast moving humanitarian emergencies or participatory development programmes, a more flexible approach is needed. • However, it is still possible to have a flexible project design and to draw conclusions about causal attribution. This middle path involves ‘loose’ theories of change, where activities and outcomes may be known, but the likely causal links between them are not yet clear. • ...
-
Adaptive programming suggests, at a minimum, that development actors react and respond to changes in the political and socio-economic operating environment. It emphasises learning and the development practitioner is encouraged to adjust their actions to find workable solutions to problems that they may face. Being prepared to react to change may seem like common sense – and indeed it is. However much development thinking and practice remains stuck in a linear planning model which...
-
Recently thousands of evaluators came together in Chicago to celebrate the growing field, share exemplary practices, and to push our collective thinking on how evaluation responds to the complexity of social change efforts.
-
Want to know better how your interventions can contribute to change? A Theory of Change (ToC) approach helps in deepening your understanding - and that of your partners - of how you collectively think change happens and what the effect will be of your intervention. Not only does it show what political, social, economic, and/or cultural factors are in play, it also clarifies your assumptions. Once a ToC has been developed, it can be used to continually reflect on it in ways that allow for...
-
The Theory of Change approach demands a radical shift towards more and better learning in development thinking and practice, creating a productive and much-needed space for critical reflection.
-
Although theories of change are frequently discussed in the evaluation literature and there is general agreement on what a theory of change is conceptually, there is actually little agreement beyond the big picture of just what a theory of change comprises, what it shows, how it can be represented, and how it can be used. This article outlines models for theories of change and their development that have proven quite useful for both straightforward and more complex interventions. The models...
-
Theory of Change (ToC) is an emerging methodology in the practice of development programmes, often contrasted with the dominant logical framework. This article reviews current debates around ToC before identifying five aspects that are appreciated in practice. It appears that these aspects mostly cover areas where the logical framework is not – or is no longer – meeting the needs of practitioners. Subsequently, the article analyses experiences in ToC training for NGO staff and concludes that...
-
New insights, opinions and perspectives on market systems development, from experts and practitioners.
-
IN 2013, the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies (RUSI) was awarded a grant under the Kanishka Project to develop a handbook for monitoring and evaluating counter violent extremism (CVE) policies and programmes. The aim of this handbook is to support CVE policy-makers and practitioners (those who design, manage and evaluate CVE programmes), by providing them with key terms regarding violent extremism and radicalisation, describing the purpose of evaluation, and...
-
This paper captures lessons from recent experiences on using ‘theories of change’ amongst organisations involved in the research–policy interface. The literature in this area highlights much of the complexity inherent in the policymaking process, as well as the challenges around finding meaningful ways to measure research uptake. As a tool, ‘theories of change’ offers much, but the paper argues that the very complexity and dynamism of the research-to-policy process means that any theory of...
-
One of our most popular publications, this brief, produced in collaboration with ORS Impact, summarizes 10 theories grounded in social science about how policy change happens. The theories can help to untangle beliefs and assumptions about the inner workings of the policymaking process and identify causal connections supported by research to explain how and why a change may or may not occur. Advocates of all stripes seek changes in policy as a way to achieve impact at a scale and degree of...
-
A new report on Theory of Change (ToC) and its use in International development has just been produced.
Explore
Theme
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
- TOC (Theory of Change)
- Case Study (1)
- Causal Mechanisms (2)
- Comparisons/Benchmarking (1)
- Contribution Analysis (3)
- Cost-Benefit Analysis (2)
- Cost-effectiveness analysis (1)
- Cross-sectional study (1)
- Data mining (1)
- Delphi Survey (1)
- Descriptive Statistics (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (1)
- Developmental Evaluation (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (1)
- Focus Group Discussions (3)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Logical Framework (3)
- Network Analysis (1)
- Objectives and options analysis (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (2)
- Outcome Mapping (2)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (1)
- Policy Scientific Approach (1)
- Political Economy Analysis (2)
- Power Analysis (1)
- Process Tracing (1)
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (1)
- Qualitative data analysis and grounded theory (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (3)
- Realist Evaluation (2)
- Scenario Planning (1)
- Stakeholder analysis (1)
- Stakeholder Feedback (1)
- Surveys (2)
- SWOT Analysis (1)
- Systemic Change (1)
- Systems Mapping (1)
- Theory-based evaluations (6)
- Adaptive Approaches [+] (13)
- Cases (6)
- Courses (1)
- Development Actors Perspectives (4)
-
Geography
(2)
-
Africa
(1)
-
Eastern Africa
(1)
- Mozambique (1)
-
Eastern Africa
(1)
-
Europe
(1)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
- Spain (1)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
-
Africa
(1)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (1)
-
Practical
(8)
- Tools (1)
-
Sectors [+]
(14)
- Advocacy and Activism (2)
- Alternative Development (1)
- Behavioural Change (1)
- Combatting violent extremism (3)
- Education (1)
- Environmental Management (1)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (2)
- Governance and Accountability (2)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (1)
- Knowledge to Practice (1)
- Research for Development (R4D) (1)
- Scaling up / Propagating (3)
- Social Accountability (1)
Resource type
- Blog Post (10)
- Book (3)
- Conference Paper (1)
- Forum Post (1)
- Journal Article (16)
- Report (32)
- Web Page (2)