Your search
Results 869 resources
-
USAID maintains staff and operations in more than 80 countries around the world, all of which the COVID-19 pandemic will disrupt. USAID remains committed to protecting the health and safety of our staff, while continuing appropriate oversight of our programs and ensuring the accountable and effective use of U.S. taxpayer funds. In the current operating environment, USAID and implementing partners face new challenges in implementing activities, monitoring progress, collecting data, and...
-
Pressure is mounting on international development cooperation agencies to prove the impact of their work. Private and public commissioners as well as the general public are increasingly asking for robust evidence of impact. In this context, rigorous impact evaluation (RIE) methods are increasingly receiving attention within the broader German development system and in GIZ. Compared to other implementing agencies such as DFID or USAid, the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale...
-
Rigorous Impact Evaluation in GIZ Governance Programmes (How-To-Note)von Schiller, A. - 2020 - Bonn
Why should I integrate an impact assessment in my programme? How will the programme benefit from it? Are the benefits worth the effort and expenses? How do I design and implement it in detail? Who is addressable for support? What should I pay attention to in order to get the most out of it? This note is meant to answer these questions. It addresses leaders and project staff of governance programmes who are interested in using this tool within their specific governance programme or project....
-
This briefing note looks at how the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Wildlife Asia programme has operationalised the concepts of adaptive rigour and adaptive management as part of its approach to collaborating, learning and adapting. As described by the Global Learning for Adaptive Management (GLAM) initiative, adaptive rigour is about ensuring that the data, information, methods, processes and systems that underpin adaptive management are robust, systematic and...
-
This briefing note focuses on the remote collection and use of data for adaptive management during the Covid-19 pandemic, setting out key considerations to help practitioners think through a transition from more ‘traditional’ monitoring, evaluation and learning (MEL) to MEL for adaptive management (MEL4AM) that reflects the unique data collection challenges presented by Covid-19. The brief provides an overview of some key considerations in remote data collection, when this is required, and...
-
Considerations for planning a post project evaluation during the project, at the end, or after it has closed.
-
Key messages • This working paper introduces a set of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) tools and approaches, discussing their potential usefulness in supporting adaptive management in development and humanitarian programmes. It emphasises adaptive programmes characterised by complex aspects, such as: (1) they are innovative; (2) they have uncertain pathways for change; or (3) they operate in uncertain or unstable environments. • The majority of these tools have been used in international...
-
Development and humanitarian organisations seeking to be adaptive have emphasised the need to be transparent about complexity and uncertainty; to be honest about their inability to control what happens; and to design programmes that change over time to become more appropriate and relevant. At their heart, adaptive management approaches emphasise the ability to lean, 'unlearn' and adapt programming accordingly. The cornerstone of effective learning is the creation, gathering, accumulation,...
-
Stakeholder Analysis is used to identify the actors and relationships that influence project outcomes. This guidance, from IRC, can help you determine how to work and who to partner, coordinate or engage with in order to best achieve the outcome. It builds on existing stakeholder information and typically will include a participatory internal meeting or workshop.
-
The recent rapid evolution of digital technologies has been changing behaviors and expectations in countries around the world. These shifts make it the right time to pose the key question this paper explores: Will digital technologies, both those that are already widespread and those that are still emerging, have substantial impacts on the way citizens engage and the ways through which power is sought, used, or contested? The authors address this question both to mitigate some of the World...
-
Based on consultations and stocktakings with LAC Missions, the LAC Bureau identified Mission Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) Specialists as influential decision makers regarding data and evidence use. The LAC Bureau aims to improve the quality and use of evidence for decision making, and ultimately to improve development outcomes.
-
CARE's Failing Forward initiative is sparking opportunities to showcase the ideas that don't work so we can spend more time implementing the ones that do. It's changing the conversation inside the organization, and leading to changes in the way we design and implement programs.
-
CARE's Failing Forward initiative is sparking opportunities to showcase the ideas that don't work so we can spend more time implementing the ones that do. It's changing the conversation inside the organization, and leading to changes in the way we design and implement programs. It's also allowing us to make connections across a global portfolio of more than 900 projects, and with new and different partners to learn from their experience.
-
ResearchGate is a network dedicated to science and research. Connect, collaborate and discover scientific publications, jobs and conferences. All for free.
-
Adaptive Management involves a dynamic interaction between three elements: delivery, programming and governance. This case study focuses on a large DfID governance project, the Institutions for Inclusive Development (I4ID), a five-year initiative in Tanzania. The study forms part of a research project to examine whether and how adaptive approaches can strengthen aid projects promoting empowerment and accountability in fragile, conflict and violence-affected settings (FCVAS). The research...
-
Donor-funded policy reform has a long history in Mozambique, with United States Agency for International Development (USAID) efforts dating to the mid-1990s. Many laws and regulations adopted during the past quarter century are the consequence of these efforts. And yet, even with several years of robust economic growth, Mozambique has not experienced the broad economic transformation that policy reforms can trigger: per capita income in 2017 was $519 and more than 80 percent of the country...
-
Within DFID, there is now a commitment to more flexible and adaptive programming. This recognises that: • DFID works in contexts that continuously evolve and change, sometimes in unpredictable ways. To respond to this, the agency needs to remain flexible – to expect change and have a good understanding of context, with resources that can be adjusted and scope to change direction if needed. All DFID programmes should be able to do this. • Some DFID programmes aim to support change in...
Explore
Theme
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(433)
- Adaptive Learning (44)
- Adaptive Management (178)
- Adaptive Rigour (4)
- Agile & Lean approaches (25)
- Capacity WORKS (3)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (27)
- Design Thinking / HCD (34)
- Doing Development Differently (12)
- Global Delivery Initiative (3)
- Human Learning Systems (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (12)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (4)
- Other Adaptive approaches (9)
-
Other sectors
(31)
- Government (1)
- Military (2)
- Organizational Management (2)
- Philosophical roots (1)
- Software Development (25)
- Participation (4)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (15)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (18)
- Positive Deviance & 2 loops models (6)
- Results Based Management (11)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (77)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (47)
- Cases (115)
- Courses (8)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(193)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- Canada - GAC & IDRC (6)
- DANIDA - Danish International Development Agency (2)
- DCED - Donor Committee for Enterprise Development (6)
- Develpment Industry - Private Companies and ThinkTanks (8)
- DFAT (Australia) (9)
- EU (1)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (40)
- G7 (1)
- GIZ (Germany) (14)
- Hivos - Netherlands (2)
- ILO (1)
- Irish Aid (2)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- New Zealand (1)
- NGO Perspectives (29)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (13)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (6)
- SDC - Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (18)
- SIDA - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (5)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (6)
- USAID (28)
- World Bank (11)
-
Geography
(107)
-
Africa
(65)
-
Central Africa
(4)
- Angola (1)
- Cameroon (1)
- Democratic Republic of the Congo (2)
-
Eastern Africa
(26)
- Ethiopia (2)
- Kenya (3)
- Malawi (2)
- Mozambique (8)
- Rwanda (2)
- Somalia (4)
- Somaliland (1)
- South Sudan (1)
- Tanzania (6)
- Uganda (3)
- Zambia (1)
- Zimbabwe (3)
- Northern Africa (2)
-
Southern Africa
(3)
- South Africa (3)
- West Africa (45)
-
Central Africa
(4)
-
Americas
(10)
-
Central America
(5)
- Ecuador (2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (4)
-
North America
(3)
- Canada (1)
- United States of America (2)
- South America (4)
-
Central America
(5)
-
Asia
(38)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
- China (1)
-
South-eastern Asia
(12)
- Cambodia (1)
- Indonesia (3)
- Myanmar (6)
- Philippines (2)
- Thailand (1)
- Timor Leste (1)
-
Southern Asia
(23)
- Afghanistan (1)
- Bangladesh (12)
- India (2)
- Nepal (13)
- Pakistan (6)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
-
Europe
(8)
-
Northern Europe
(2)
- United Kingdom (2)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
- Spain (1)
-
Western Europe
(5)
- Germany (3)
- Netherlands (1)
- Switzerland (1)
-
Northern Europe
(2)
- Many geographies (3)
-
Oceania
(3)
- Australia and New Zealand (2)
- Melanesia (1)
-
Africa
(65)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(303)
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (4)
- After Action Reviews (5)
- Appreciative Inquiry (1)
- Beneficiary Assessment/Engagement (8)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Case Study (4)
- Causal Mechanisms (3)
- Circular charts applications (radar, pie, sunburst, spiderweb, orbic, etc) (1)
- Context Monitoring (2)
- Contribution Analysis (5)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Critical Systems Heuristics (3)
- Democratic Evaluation (2)
- Desk based research/lit review (2)
- Developmental Evaluation (8)
- Diaries (1)
- Empowerment Evaluation (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (2)
- Evaluability assessment (2)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (5)
- Ex-post Evaluation (3)
- Feedback Systems (3)
- Focus Group Discussions (1)
- Horizontal Evaluation (1)
- Impact evaluation (7)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (3)
- Indicator-based approaches (4)
- Innovation History (1)
- Innovation System Analysis (4)
- Institutional Histories (2)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (5)
- Logical Framework (5)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (3)
- MEL Bricolage (1)
- MEL in International Development (14)
- Most Significant Change (4)
- Narrative Based Approaches (2)
- Network Analysis (2)
- Outcome Harvesting (9)
- Outcome Mapping (18)
- Participatory Action Research (11)
- Participatory Evaluation (10)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (5)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (2)
- Political Economy Analysis (12)
- Political Settlements Analysis (1)
- Portfolio Management (11)
- Positive Deviance (4)
- Post Project Evaluations (1)
- Process Tracing (3)
- Public Management Theory (1)
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (4)
- Qualitative data analysis and grounded theory (1)
- Qualitative Impact Assessment Protocol (3)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (8)
- Realist Evaluation (4)
- Remote Monitoring (1)
- Rigour (2)
- Rubrics (6)
- Scenario Planning (3)
-
Sense-making
(7)
- SenseMaker (4)
- Social Return on Investment (1)
- Stakeholder analysis (2)
- Stakeholder Feedback (2)
- Strategy testing (3)
- Success Case Method (1)
- Surveys (2)
- Sustainability (3)
- Systemic Change (26)
- Systems Mapping (4)
- Tech 4 MEL (4)
- Theory-based evaluations (4)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (32)
- Trust-based evaluation (/philanthropy /learning) (2)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (3)
- Value for Investment (4)
- Value for Money (7)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (23)
-
Practical
(106)
- Tools (14)
-
Sectors [+]
(297)
- Advocacy and Activism (6)
- Agriculture (2)
- Alternative Development (39)
- Behavioural Change (4)
- Cash Trasfers (1)
- Children (8)
- Citizen Engagement (14)
- Climate Change (5)
- Combatting violent extremism (3)
- Economic development (12)
- Education (4)
- Employment (1)
- Environmental Management (11)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (12)
- Gender (9)
- Governance and Accountability (83)
- Health (4)
- Humanitarian Aid (9)
-
Innovation (in Development)
(31)
- Funding (1)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (17)
- Institutional Reform (5)
- Judicial systems (3)
- Knowledge to Practice (14)
- Locally driven development (17)
- NGOs (22)
- Organizational Change (9)
- Pastoralism (1)
- Peace Building (6)
- Philanthropy (3)
- Scaling up / Propagating (18)
- Social Accountability (65)
- Technology (in Development) (19)
- Waste Management (1)
Resource type
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(14)
- Between 1970 and 1979 (2)
-
Between 1980 and 1989
(1)
- 1989 (1)
- Between 1990 and 1999 (11)
-
Between 2000 and 2025
(852)
- Between 2000 and 2009 (56)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (589)
- Between 2020 and 2025 (207)
- Unknown (3)