Your search
Results 201 resources
-
How to create the change you want to see in the world using the paradigm-busting ideas in this "utterly fascinating" (Adam Grant) big-idea book. Most of what we know about how ideas spread comes from bestselling authors who give us a compelling picture of a world, in which "influencers" are king, "sticky" ideas "go viral," and good behavior is "nudged" forward. The problem is that the world they describe is a world where information spreads, but beliefs and behaviors stay the same. When...
-
A-ha! A moment etched in my memory: 20 or so researchers were...
-
There is a glaring gap and compelling need for approaches and methods that realign to new rigour through timeliness, cost-effectiveness, relevance and being actionable. Over the past few years, the Sanitation Learning Hub, in collaboration with the Government of India, Praxis, WSSCC and WaterAid India, have been developing Rapid Action Learning approaches. Multiple approaches have been trialled, with flexible formats, but the essential criteria is that learning is timely, relevant and...
-
Theory of Change is more than just a tool or instrument. It is a mindset! A mindset to optimise impact management. As the cornerstone of impact management it is indispensable to any purpose-driven organisation targeting social or environmental value creation. It offers you the cornerstone of a learning approach toward change and impact. A way to build a mindset and organisational culture of critical reflection, co-creation with stakeholders and constant analysis of what works, why, for whom...
-
The United Kingdom Research and Innovation (UKRI) Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) aimed to address global challenges to achieve the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals through 12 interdisciplinary research hubs. This research documents key lessons learned around working with Theory of Change (ToC) to guide Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) within these complex research for development hubs. Interviews and document reviews were conducted in ten of the research...
-
This Green Paper intends to review key elements of the problem that Development actors will confront as a new decade opens up ahead of us. It will articulate a solution that we believe should become an inherent feature of Development programs and initiatives. This is the outcome of an intense period of experiences and reflections in the Development space across different geographies and institutional mandates and activities, during which the Foundation has collaborated with institutions such...
-
The Covid-19 Responses for Equity (CORE) programme was a three-year initiative funded by the Canadian International Development Research Centre (IDRC) that brought together 20 projects from across the global South to understand the socioeconomic impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic, improve existing responses, and generate better policy options for recovery. The research covered 42 countries across Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East to understand the ways in which the pandemic...
-
How can donors and grantees work together to create effective monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) practices that drive field-wide transformation? The Open Society Foundation’s Fiscal Governance Program found success by focusing on six key approaches, including empowering grantees and relinquishing power. In 2021, an external close-out evaluation by Intention to Impact of the program (which ran for 7 years and gave over $150 million in grants) revealed something pretty remarkable—the...
-
Participatory action research (PAR) is an approach to research that prioritizes the value of experiential knowledge for tackling problems caused by unequal and harmful social systems, and for envisioning and implementing alternatives. PAR involves the participation and leadership of those people experiencing issues, who take action to produce emancipatory social change, through conducting systematic research to generate new knowledge. This Primer sets out key considerations for the design of...
-
ParEvo is a method of exploring alternative futures or histories, using a participatory evolutionary process (hence ParEvo). The process is designed to be used by multiple people, to produce a branching structure of storylines about what did, or could, happen. Participants are anonymous and can choose the extent to which they collaborate with others. Participants are also able to tag, comment on, and evaluate the storylines that are generated. Completed exercises can be analysed using...
-
Sensemaking and Participatory Narrative Inquiry (PNI) are similar approaches, based on collecting stories about a real life experience from a large number of stakeholders on a topic of interest to the evaluation, and giving the storytellers themselves the responsibility for analyzing and making sense of the stories. Because a large number of stories are collected and self-interpreted, it is possible to conduct quantitative analysis of recurrent themes, perspectives and feelings emerging in...
-
This learning paper provides guidance to humanitarian innovators on how to use evidence to enable and drive adoption of innovation. Innovation literature and practice show time and time again that it is difficult to scale innovations. Even when an innovation is demonstrably impactful, better than the existing solution and good value for money, it does not automatically get adopted or used in mainstream humanitarian programming. Why do evidence-based innovations face difficulties in scaling...
-
Internal and external stakeholders have different information needs over a project’s life, for purposes that include adaptive management, accountability, compliance, reporting and learning. A project’s monitoring, evaluation, accountability and learning, or MEAL, system should provide the information needed by these stakeholders at the level of statistical reliability, detail and timing appropriate to inform data use. In emergency contexts where the situation is still fluid, ‘informal...
-
The Cynefin Centre’s Citizen Engagement & Democratic Innovation programme provides tools for collective sense-making in the areas of community development and youth work; civic engagement and democratic innovation; collaborative service/policy design and evaluation; housing/tenant engagement; futures and planning; shared learning and peer to peer knowledge exchange.
-
The Method Positive Deviance (PD) is based on the observation that in every community or organization, there are a few individuals who achieve significantly better outcomes than their peers, despite having similar challenges and resources. These individuals are referred to as positive deviants, and adopting their solutions is what is referred to as the PD approach¹. The method described in this Handbook follows the same logic as the PD approach but uses pre-existing, non-traditional data...
-
This guide has been developed to help build confidence and capability, distilling useful tips and considerations that may help teams think through programme delivery issues and interpret elements of the PrOF Rules. This PrOF Guide lays out: - The definition of beneficiary engagement. - The case for beneficiary engagement. - FCDO’s approach to beneficiary engagement. - Practical tips for how to integrate beneficiary engagement throughout the programme cycle, including guiding questions to...
-
Development and radical uncertaintyFeinstein, O. - 2020 - Development in Practice, 30(8), 1105–1113
Development strategies, programmes and projects are designed making assumptions concerning several variables such as future prices of outputs and inputs, exchange rates and productivity growth. However, knowledge about the future is limited. Uncertainty prevails. The usual approach to deal with uncertainty is to reduce it to risk. Uncertainty is perceived as a negative factor that should and can be eliminated. This article presents an alternative approach which recognises that radical...
-
“Hacking by the prompt”—writing simple yet creative conversational instructions in ChatGPT's message window—revealed many valuable additions to the evaluator's toolbox for all stages of the evaluation process. This includes the production of terms of reference and proposals for the dissemination of final reports. ChatGPT does not come with an instruction book, so evaluators must experiment creatively to understand its potential. The surprising performance of ChatGPT leads to the question:...
-
In the decades since the Army created the After Action Review (AAR), businesses have embraced the practice as a way of learning from both failure and success. But all too often the practice gets reduced to nothing more than a pro forma exercise. The authors of this article describe the history and philosophy of the original AAR, debunk three myths about the practice that impede its proper use, and finally suggest three improvements that can help business leaders make the most of it.
-
This report addresses the well-recognized evidence gap1 on the longer-term impacts created by marketdriven programming; specifically, programming influenced by market systems development (MSD) principles. It does so by presenting the findings of an ex-post study conducted three and a half years after the close of USAID’s Feed the Future Senegal Naatal Mbay Activity (hereafter Naatal Mbay) in 2019. It examines the scale and sustainability of changes resulting from Naatal Mbay’s introduction...
Explore
Theme
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (5)
- After Action Reviews (4)
- Artificial Intelligence (4)
- Beneficiary Assessment/Engagement (3)
- Capacity Development (2)
- Case Study (2)
- Causal Mechanisms (11)
- Circular charts applications (radar, pie, sunburst, spiderweb, orbic, etc) (3)
- Community Led MEL (2)
- Context Monitoring (1)
- Contribution Analysis (7)
- Cost-Benefit Analysis (1)
- Critical Friends (3)
- Critical Systems Heuristics (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (1)
- Diaries (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (1)
- Evaluability assessment (1)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (2)
- Ex-post Evaluation (4)
- Feedback Systems (4)
- Humour (1)
- Impact evaluation (5)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (2)
- Innovation System Analysis (1)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (3)
- Logical Framework (2)
- MEL Bricolage (2)
- MEL in International Development (24)
- Most Significant Change (1)
- Narrative Based Approaches (1)
- Network Analysis (6)
- Outcome Harvesting (2)
- Outcome Mapping (5)
- Participatory Action Research (9)
- Participatory Evaluation (6)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (3)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (2)
- Political Economy Analysis (3)
- Portfolio Management (9)
- Positive Deviance (2)
- Post Project Evaluations (1)
- Power Analysis (1)
- Process Tracing (10)
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (6)
- Realist Evaluation (5)
- Remote Monitoring (1)
- Rigour (3)
- Rubrics (14)
- Rules of Thumb (1)
- Scenario Planning (3)
- SenseMaker (3)
- Stakeholder analysis (1)
- Strategy testing (1)
- Surveys (1)
- Sustainability (4)
- Systemic Change (27)
- Systems Mapping (6)
- Tech 4 MEL (4)
- Theory-based evaluations (6)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (19)
- Value for Investment (2)
- Value for Money (4)
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(84)
- Adaptive Learning (11)
- Adaptive Management (29)
- Adaptive Rigour (2)
- Agile & Lean approaches (1)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (6)
- Design Thinking / HCD (2)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (6)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (1)
- Other sectors (3)
- Participation (4)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (1)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (3)
- Results Based Management (1)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (31)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (5)
- Cases (23)
- Courses (1)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(39)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- China (1)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (7)
- GIZ (Germany) (5)
- Hivos - Netherlands (1)
- Irish Aid (1)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- NGO Perspectives (8)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (2)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (2)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (2)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (5)
- USAID (11)
- World Bank (1)
-
Geography
(28)
-
Africa
(17)
- Central Africa (2)
-
Eastern Africa
(15)
- Kenya (1)
- Malawi (2)
- Mozambique (5)
- Rwanda (2)
- Somalia (3)
- South Sudan (1)
- Tanzania (1)
- Uganda (2)
- Zambia (1)
- Zimbabwe (3)
- Northern Africa (2)
-
Southern Africa
(1)
- South Africa (1)
- West Africa (10)
-
Americas
(6)
-
Central America
(4)
- Ecuador (2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (3)
- South America (4)
-
Central America
(4)
-
Asia
(17)
- South-eastern Asia (2)
-
Southern Asia
(12)
- Bangladesh (7)
- India (1)
- Nepal (7)
- Pakistan (3)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Europe
(2)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
- Spain (1)
-
Western Europe
(1)
- Germany (1)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
-
Africa
(17)
-
Practical
(38)
- Tools (6)
-
Sectors [+]
(63)
- Agriculture (3)
- Alternative Development (6)
- Cash Trasfers (2)
- Children (8)
- Citizen Engagement (1)
- Climate Change (2)
- Economic development (6)
- Education (3)
- Employment (1)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (2)
- Gender (2)
- Governance and Accountability (13)
- Health (1)
- Humanitarian Aid (2)
- Innovation (in Development) (4)
- Knowledge to Practice (3)
- Locally driven development (3)
- Organizational Change (3)
- Peace Building (2)
- Private Sector Development (1)
- Research for Development (R4D) (4)
- Scaling up / Propagating (4)
- Social Accountability (1)
- Social Protection (1)
Resource type
- Blog Post (40)
- Book (5)
- Book Section (1)
- Conference Paper (1)
- Journal Article (36)
- Magazine Article (4)
- Manuscript (1)
- Presentation (2)
- Radio Broadcast (1)
- Report (97)
- Thesis (2)
- Video Recording (7)
- Web Page (4)