Your search
Results 250 resources
-
Rigorous Impact Evaluation in GIZ Governance Programmes (How-To-Note)von Schiller, A. - 2020 - Bonn
Why should I integrate an impact assessment in my programme? How will the programme benefit from it? Are the benefits worth the effort and expenses? How do I design and implement it in detail? Who is addressable for support? What should I pay attention to in order to get the most out of it? This note is meant to answer these questions. It addresses leaders and project staff of governance programmes who are interested in using this tool within their specific governance programme or project....
-
In this blog we are sharing a digest of some of the many useful and innovative monitoring, evaluation and learning resources and efforts that have come through the M&E Sandbox in 2022. A lot of these resources have been shared by our community in response to the overwhelmingly positive feedback from the launch of the Sandbox (please keep them coming!). We hope you find it useful. We have grouped these efforts and resources under six broad questions: - How do we measure systems...
-
This learning paper highlights how elements of outcome mapping were used by Save the Children Sweden in a project (2018-2020) that supports adolescents, affected by the Syria crisis, to become more resilient. The paper first outlines how the spheres of influence framework has been applied to develop an actor focused theory of change. It then describes how progress markers, as an alternative to SMART indicators, were formulated to monitor the programme’s results. The paper also outlines how...
-
What have we learned from implementing results-based management in development co-operation organisations? What progress and benefits can be seen? What are the main challenges and unintended consequences? Are there good practices to address these challenges? To respond to these questions this paper reviews and analyses the findings from various evaluations and reviews of results-based management systems conducted by members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC), the OECD/DAC Results...
-
USAID’s Bureau for Policy, Planning and Learning (PPL) and its support mechanism, LEARN, have developed a Collaborating, Learning, and Adapting (CLA) Framework and Maturity tool to help USAID missions think more deliberately about how to plan for and implement CLA approaches that fit the mission’s context and assist them in achieving their development objectives. While the tool is intended primarily for USAID audiences to be used in participatory self-assessment workshops, the CLA Framework...
-
USAID’s Bureau for Policy, Planning and Learning (PPL) and its support mechanism, LEARN, have developed a Collaborating, Learning, and Adapting (CLA) Framework and Maturity tool to help USAID missions think more deliberately about how to plan for and implement CLA approaches that fit the mission’s context and assist them in achieving their development objectives. While the tool is intended primarily for USAID audiences to be used in participatory self-assessment workshops, the CLA Framework...
-
Although collaborating, learning, and adapting (CLA) are not new to USAID and its implementing partners, they often do not happen regularly or systematically and are not intentionally resourced. The CLA Framework above identifies components and subcomponents to help you think more deliberately about what approach to CLA might be best tailored to your organizational or project context. The framework recognizes the diversity of what CLA can look like in various organizations and projects while...
-
The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) of tomorrow is one in which the Agency enables partner countries to plan, resource, and manage their own development through strengthened capacity and commitment — this is the essence of the Journey to Self-Reliance. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2018, the Agency obligated over 80 percent of its programmatic funding — a total of $17 billion — through acquisition and assistance (A&A) mechanisms. Partnering and procurement are central to how we do...
-
This BAA allows USAID Operating Units (OUs) to co-create, co-design, co-invest, and collaborate in the research, development, piloting, testing, and scaling of innovative, practical, and cost-effective interventions to catalyze locally led development. The BAA aligns with a number of Agency priorities and policies, including the Journey to Self-Reliance, resilience, procurement innovation, and expanding and diversifying the partner base - as well as the New Partnerships Initiative and...
-
This presentation features USAID/PPL's Stacey Young discussing the history of learning at USAID; how collaborating, learning, and adapting (CLA) can enhance development outcomes, and the role of implementing partners in supporting this vision.
-
Although collaborating, learning, and adapting (CLA) are not new to USAID, they often do not happen regularly or systematically and are not intentionally resourced. The CLA framework above identifies components and subcomponents to help you think more deliberately about what approach to CLA might be best tailored to your organizational or project context. The framework recognizes the diversity of what CLA can look like in various organizations and projects while also giving CLA structure,...
-
This job aid will help you determine how best to resolve a challenge/issue in programming. It is intended for use by USAID, partners, and others working in international development.
-
The Program Cycle is USAID’s operational model for planning, delivering, assessing, and adapting development programming in a given region or country to advance U.S. foreign policy. It encompasses guidance and procedures for: 1) Making strategic decisions at the regional or country level about programmatic areas of focus and associated resources; 2) Designing projects and supportive activities to implement strategic plans; and 3) Learning from performance monitoring, evaluations, and other...
-
The Program Cycle is USAID’s operational model for planning, delivering, assessing, and adapting development programming in a given region or country to advance U.S. foreign policy. It encompasses guidance and procedures for: 1) Making strategic decisions at the regional or country level about programmatic areas of focus and associated resources; 2) Designing supportive projects and/or activities to implement these strategic plans; and 3) Learning from performance monitoring, evaluations,...
-
The Program Cycle is USAID’s operational model for planning, delivering, assessing, and adapting development programming in a given region or country to advance U.S. foreign policy. It encompasses guidance and procedures for: 1) Making strategic decisions at the regional or country level about programmatic areas of focus and associated resources; 2) Designing projects and supportive activities to implement strategic plans; and 3) Learning from performance monitoring, evaluations, and other...
Explore
Theme
-
Development Actors Perspectives
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- Canada - GAC & IDRC (12)
- China (3)
- DANIDA - Danish International Development Agency (2)
- DCED - Donor Committee for Enterprise Development (13)
- DFAT (Australia) (14)
- EU (1)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (44)
- G7 (1)
- GIZ (Germany) (20)
- Hivos - Netherlands (2)
- IFAD (1)
- ILO (1)
- Irish Aid (4)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- New Zealand (1)
- NGO Perspectives (33)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (16)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (5)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (5)
- SDC - Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (22)
- SIDA - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (5)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (10)
- USAID (36)
- WFP (1)
- World Bank (17)
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(135)
- Adaptive Learning (9)
- Adaptive Management (70)
- Adaptive Rigour (1)
- Agile & Lean approaches (2)
- Capacity WORKS (6)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (9)
- Design Thinking / HCD (2)
- Doing Development Differently (3)
- Global Delivery Initiative (2)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (9)
- Other Adaptive approaches (7)
-
Other sectors
(1)
- Government (1)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (2)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (6)
- Results Based Management (14)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (18)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (8)
- Cases (40)
- Courses (3)
-
Geography
(33)
-
Africa
(16)
- Central Africa (2)
-
Eastern Africa
(10)
- Kenya (2)
- Malawi (1)
- Mozambique (3)
- Rwanda (2)
- Somalia (2)
- Somaliland (1)
- Tanzania (1)
- Uganda (2)
- Zimbabwe (1)
-
Northern Africa
(1)
- Egypt (1)
-
West Africa
(11)
- Benim (1)
- Niger (2)
- Nigeria (4)
- Senegal (1)
- Sierra Leone (3)
-
Americas
(7)
-
Central America
(4)
- Costa Rica (1)
- Ecuador (2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (1)
- Mexico (2)
-
North America
(1)
- Canada (1)
- South America (3)
-
Central America
(4)
-
Asia
(13)
-
Eastern Asia
(2)
- China (2)
-
South-eastern Asia
(6)
- Cambodia (1)
- Indonesia (1)
- Lao People's Democratic Republic (1)
- Myanmar (5)
- Viet Nam (1)
-
Southern Asia
(4)
- Bangladesh (2)
- Nepal (1)
- Pakistan (2)
-
Western Asia
(2)
- Israel (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Eastern Asia
(2)
-
Europe
(6)
-
Northern Europe
(1)
- United Kingdom (1)
-
Western Europe
(5)
- Germany (3)
- Netherlands (1)
- Switzerland (1)
-
Northern Europe
(1)
- Many geographies (1)
- Oceania (1)
-
Africa
(16)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(65)
- After Action Reviews (2)
- Beneficiary Assessment/Engagement (4)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Context Monitoring (1)
- Contribution Analysis (1)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (1)
- Ex-post Evaluation (1)
- Feedback Systems (2)
- Impact evaluation (4)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (2)
- Innovation System Analysis (1)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Logical Framework (3)
- MEL in International Development (10)
- Outcome Mapping (1)
- Participatory Action Research (1)
- Participatory Evaluation (2)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (2)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (3)
- Policy Scientific Approach (1)
- Portfolio Management (3)
- Positive Deviance (2)
- Process Tracing (1)
- Realist Evaluation (1)
- Rigour (2)
- Rubrics (2)
- Scenario Planning (1)
- Strategy testing (1)
- Systemic Change (10)
- Systems Mapping (2)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (4)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (1)
- Value for Money (2)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (4)
-
Practical
(45)
- Tools (6)
-
Sectors [+]
(72)
- Agriculture (3)
- Alternative Development (10)
- Children (2)
- Citizen Engagement (1)
- Climate Change (1)
- Economic development (7)
- Environmental Management (4)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (4)
- Gender (4)
- Governance and Accountability (13)
- Health (2)
- Humanitarian Aid (3)
-
Innovation (in Development)
(7)
- Funding (1)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (4)
- Institutional Reform (1)
- Judicial systems (1)
- Knowledge to Practice (2)
- Land Reform (1)
- Locally driven development (8)
- Locally led development (1)
- NGOs (9)
- Organizational Change (4)
- Peace Building (2)
- Scaling up / Propagating (3)
- Social Accountability (6)
- Technology (in Development) (2)
Resource type
- Blog Post (17)
- Book (9)
- Book Section (4)
- Conference Paper (1)
- Document (1)
- Journal Article (10)
- Magazine Article (2)
- Presentation (4)
- Radio Broadcast (1)
- Report (184)
- Thesis (2)
- Video Recording (3)
- Web Page (12)