Your search
Results 62 resources
-
Pressure is mounting on international development cooperation agencies to prove the impact of their work. Private and public commissioners as well as the general public are increasingly asking for robust evidence of impact. In this context, rigorous impact evaluation (RIE) methods are increasingly receiving attention within the broader German development system and in GIZ. Compared to other implementing agencies such as DFID or USAid, the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale...
-
Many education systems in low- and middle-income countries are experiencing a learning crisis. Many efforts to address this crisis do not account for the system features of education, meaning that they fail to consider the ways that interactions and feedback loops produce outcomes. Thinking through the feedback relationships that produce the education system can be challenging. The RISE Education Systems Framework, which is sufficiently structured to give boundaries to the analysis but...
-
Recognising that aid and development programming takes place in complex contexts, Mercy Corps is increasingly seeking to understand how best to manage programs which iterate, adapt and respond to the consistently evolving settings in which we work. This brief Practice Paper provides some examples of what adaptive management looks like in practice on the Prospects youth employment program in Liberia. It does not seek to function as a manual or set of guidelines, but simply provides some...
-
Calls for more ‘adaptive programming’ have been prominent in international development practice for over a decade. Learning-by-doing is a crucial element of this, but programmes have often found it challenging to become more learning oriented. Establishing some form of reflective practice, against countervailing incentives, is difficult. Incorporating data collection processes that generate useful, timely and practical information to inform these reflections is even more so.This paper...
-
The first case of COVID-19 in Nigeria was confirmed on 27 February 2020, with the first lockdown orders issued on 30 March 2020. The pandemic and resultant containment measures have had farreaching socio-cultural, economic, financial and political implications, globally as well as in Nigeria. For the Partnership to Engage, Reform and Learn (PERL) and its partners, the pandemic has required considerable adaptation of their strategic approach and working practices. This report reflects on...
-
We are piloting a new approach to identifying and supporting our partners. This breaks with convention in many ways in order to improve impact. SAVI Approach Papers summarise key aspects of SAVI’s way of working. They explain what we do, and why – and link to relevant tools and frameworks. Our approach is summarized in...
-
In May 2016, SAVI transitioned into a successor programme – the ‘Engaged Citizens Pillar’ (ECP) of a wider DFID-funded governance reform programme ‘The Partnership to Engage, Reform and Learn’ (PERL). ECP is managed by the same service provider, Palladium, and the same core management team as SAVI, and many of the SAVI front line staff...
-
Governance reform is about government and citizens working together in more responsive, inclusive and accountable ways for the benefit of citizens. More responsive, inclusive and accountable attitudes and behaviour on the part of government and non-government stakeholders are the critical factors which lead to meaningful reform processes, and replicate and sustain reforms beyond the lifetime...
-
SAVI as a programme does not directly work with state governments – but we work in close conjunction with sister programmes who are supporting state governments on governance and sector reforms. SAVI supports non-government and SHoA partners to play their part in promoting more responsive, inclusive and accountable state governance delivering better services for citizens....
-
SAVI, a DFID funded programme implemented by Palladium, is an adaptive programme putting learning and adaptation at the centre of all decision-making. In relation to management and staffing SAVI has established the following approaches to facilitate this: – An adaptive approach to programme management: Full time strategic technical leadership, that works closely with and complements...
-
SAVI, is seeking to support processes of citizen engagement in governance in ways that are effective in influencing reform, and that are able to take on a life of their own without continuing donor support. SAVI is also an adaptive programme, putting learning and adaptation at the centre of all decision-making. Money is used and...
-
SAVI has established its own framework for assessing Value for Money in annual performance – in relation to expenditure, economy, efficiency, effectiveness and equity. Routine tracking and analysis of expenditure and economy ensure that inputs are supplied and services delivered to partners in line with SAVI’s core values, whilst also meeting DFID requirements and competing...
-
SAVI, a DFID funded programme implemented by Palladium, is an adaptive programme, aiming to put learning and adaptation at the centre of all decision-making. Learning and adaptation takes place in SAVI at three levels: the work of partners; the work of SAVI delivery teams; and the enabling environment of the programme as a whole. Achieving...
-
In May 2016, SAVI transitioned into a successor programme – the ‘Engaged Citizens Pillar’ (ECP) of a wider DFID-funded governance reform programme ‘The Partnership to Engage, Reform and Learn’ (PERL). ECP is managed by the same service provider, Palladium, and the same core management team as SAVI, and many of the SAVI front line staff...
-
SAVI supports citizen engagement in governance through a facilitated partnership approach, in contrast to the usual approach of grants to civil society organisations (CSOs). The overall aim is to facilitate and support working relationships and processes of reform that are home-grown, self-sustaining and, after initial engagement, not dependent on external support. Our way of working...
-
SAVI’s theory of change is a simple, practical guide that staff and partners use to plan and to monitor change – as well as to reflect on and enhance their own effectiveness. It sets out broad stages of attitude and behaviour change over time to facilitate effective citizen engagement in governance processes, systems and structures....
-
Thinking and acting politically is central to the SAVI programme. We support staff and partners to analyse the power relations that shape change in their state, and to use this knowledge to inform their decision-making. This includes decisions made by SAVI state teams relating to the issues and partners they engage with and support, and...
-
SAVI aims to facilitate replicable and sustainable processes of citizen engagement in governance. The programme in each state is locally defined, flexible and adaptive, and results are not predictable in advance. Standardised monitoring tools are not applicable, and consequently we have evolved our tools and frameworks during the programme through processes of learning by doing....
-
SAVI state teams provide support to CS groups to become more effective agents of citizens’ voice and public accountability, through a variety of mutually reinforcing interventions. These include: hands-on support to demonstration civil society Advocacy Partnerships (APs) facilitating working partnerships between civil society APs, SHoAs, and the media brokering working relationships between all of these...
Explore
Theme
-
Geography
-
Africa
-
Central Africa
(4)
- Angola (1)
- Cameroon (1)
- Democratic Republic of the Congo (2)
-
Eastern Africa
(24)
- Ethiopia (1)
- Kenya (2)
- Malawi (2)
- Mozambique (8)
- Rwanda (2)
- Somalia (4)
- Somaliland (1)
- South Sudan (1)
- Tanzania (5)
- Uganda (3)
- Zambia (1)
- Zimbabwe (3)
- Northern Africa (2)
-
Southern Africa
(3)
- South Africa (3)
- West Africa (43)
-
Central Africa
(4)
-
Americas
(6)
-
Central America
(4)
- Ecuador (2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (3)
- South America (4)
-
Central America
(4)
-
Asia
(11)
- South-eastern Asia (4)
-
Southern Asia
(9)
- Bangladesh (1)
- India (1)
- Nepal (3)
- Pakistan (5)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(2)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
-
Europe
(1)
-
Western Europe
(1)
- Germany (1)
-
Western Europe
(1)
-
Africa
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(53)
- Adaptive Learning (1)
- Adaptive Management (42)
- Agile & Lean approaches (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (1)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (1)
- Other Adaptive approaches (1)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (1)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (3)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (6)
- Cases (49)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(13)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (4)
- GIZ (Germany) (3)
- Irish Aid (1)
- NGO Perspectives (1)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (2)
- USAID (2)
- World Bank (2)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(18)
- After Action Reviews (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Ex-post Evaluation (2)
- Impact evaluation (2)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (1)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- MEL in International Development (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (1)
- Portfolio Management (1)
- Positive Deviance (2)
- Rigour (1)
- Strategy testing (1)
- Systemic Change (2)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (1)
- Value for Money (4)
- Practical (9)
-
Sectors [+]
(26)
- Agriculture (1)
- Citizen Engagement (1)
- Economic development (3)
- Education (2)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (4)
- Gender (5)
- Governance and Accountability (10)
- Health (1)
- Humanitarian Aid (2)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (1)
- Knowledge to Practice (1)
- Locally driven development (1)
- Locally led development (1)
- NGOs (1)
- Peace Building (1)
- Social Accountability (5)
Resource type
Publication year
-
Between 2000 and 2024
(62)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (40)
- Between 2020 and 2024 (21)
-
Between 2030 and 2024
(1)
- 2034 (1)