Your search
Results 131 resources
-
The CommunityFirst Framework is intended to be implemented by field teams at MSF. The theoretical aspects and evidence presented on the importance of community engagement are intended for all MSF staff seeking to learn more about why and how to shift the way we work with communities as humanitarians. We believe this guideline, and other tools like it (including OCA’s Person-Centred Approach Guidance07, and MSF Vienna Evaluation Unit’s Guidance for Involving Communities08), to be an important...
-
Any mission-focused government should be well equipped to define, from day one, what outcomes it wants to bring about. But radically changing what the government does is only part of the challenge. We also need to change how government does things. The usual methods, we argue in this paper, are too prone to failure and delay. There’s a different approach to public service organisation, one based on multidisciplinary teams, starting with citizen needs, and scaling iteratively by testing...
-
Social accountability has become increasingly important to development programming since the 2004 World Development Report spearheaded its first generation of programming. In 2016, Thomas Carothers synthesized global experts’ perspectives on what became known as the second generation. With an evolving global context, new research and evaluations and tacit knowledge on how those assumptions played out in practice, the time is ripe for asking what the evidence since 2004 can tell us about what...
-
The Covid-19 Responses for Equity (CORE) programme was a three-year initiative funded by the Canadian International Development Research Centre (IDRC) that brought together 20 projects from across the global South to understand the socioeconomic impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic, improve existing responses, and generate better policy options for recovery. The research covered 42 countries across Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East to understand the ways in which the pandemic...
-
Organising for Systems Innovation at Scale Our team at Griffith Centre for Systems Innovation have been experimenting with and evolving a Challenge-led Innovation Approach (based on Mission-oriented approaches developed by Mariana Mazzucato at UCL IIPP and others internationally). We are using this approach to guide the way we work internally and engage with our systems innovation partners. We’ve facilitated intensive Re:Treats, worked with government bodies, businesses and civic...
-
This note presents the key components of a potential next generation of social accountability programming. The key aspects outlined emerge from a review of over 150 cases as well as tacit knowledge from dozens of practitioners (Guerzovich and Aston, 2023).The main thread of social accountability 3.0 and what distinguishes it from previous generations is a focus on its contribution towards more responsive systems and accountable social contracts. In particular, social accountability should be...
-
This report addresses the well-recognized evidence gap1 on the longer-term impacts created by marketdriven programming; specifically, programming influenced by market systems development (MSD) principles. It does so by presenting the findings of an ex-post study conducted three and a half years after the close of USAID’s Feed the Future Senegal Naatal Mbay Activity (hereafter Naatal Mbay) in 2019. It examines the scale and sustainability of changes resulting from Naatal Mbay’s introduction...
-
DT Global is proud to introduce our new Guidance Note: Practical Introduction to Adaptive Management There is a growing consensus around adaptive management as an effective (even necessary) approach when programs are tackling complex development problems. While there is no standard definition of adaptive management, there is general agreement that such programs need to routinely engage with and respond to program context; constantly test what works in that context; and adjust approaches,...
-
A resource designed to help organisations, teams and individuals manage innovation journeys responsibly and successfully. We have partnered with MIT D-Lab to develop a new resource to drive greater diversity and inclusion within project design and implementation. The Participation for Humanitarian Innovation (PfHI) toolkit sets out a robust approach to setting expectations for and monitoring the degree of participation within research and innovation projects for, with, and by people...
-
A resource designed to help organisations, teams and individuals manage innovation journeys responsibly and successfully. We have partnered with MIT D-Lab to develop a new resource to drive greater diversity and inclusion within project design and implementation. The Participation for Humanitarian Innovation (PfHI) toolkit sets out a robust approach to setting expectations for and monitoring the degree of participation within research and innovation projects for, with, and by people...
-
Addressing 21st century development challenges requires investments in innovation, including the use of new approaches and technologies. Currently, many development organisations prioritise investments in isolated innovation pilots that leverage a specific approach or technology rather than pursuing a strategic approach to expand the organisation’s toolbox with innovations that have proven their comparative advantage over what is currently used. This Working Paper addresses this challenge of...
-
Nearly all challenges in international development tend to be complex because they depend on constantly evolving human behaviour, systems, and contexts, involving multiple actors, entities, and processes. As a result, both the discovery and scaling of innovations to address challenges in development often involve changes in system behaviour or even system-level transformation. This is rarely a linear process over time and can result in unexpected outcomes. Existing evaluation techniques...
-
The conversation on adaptive management has grown fast amongst development actors. These conversations often focus on designing, commissioning, and managing large-scale development programmes. Exactly how this impacts the frontline, the implementers, and day-to-day project delivery is still being debated. Yet, perspectives drawn directly from practice are often largely missing within these debates. This paper is written by two development practitioners. Through this paper, we reflect on the...
-
Over the last 15 years the concept of scale has become a foundational part of the apparatus of the social and environmental change sector. A business mindset of growth has been seamlessly transferred to the social and environmental problems we are collectively trying to shift in the world. Scaling up, (influencing policy) has been considered the strategic pathway to systems change. Scaling out (spreading new models) is seen as a pathway to success. The allure of these scaling theories lies,...
-
Effective learning is a key driver of market systems change, with the potential to enhance system competitiveness, resilience, and inclusiveness. Shifting the Locus of Learning: Catalyzing Private Sector Learning to Drive Systemic Change recently outlined a rationale for enhancing the scale and quality of learning in a system and identifying 10 strategies programs can contextualize to catalyze learning. These strategies are also backed with robust examples from 13 programs doing this work...
-
Coalitions—groups of organizations and individuals that work together to pursue a common policy goal or reform—are crucial to development. Some of The Asia Foundation’s longest-standing and most successful development programs and portfolios have used coalition-building as an implementation modality. This paper examines successful initiatives in Bangladesh, Nepal, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Timor-Leste. By delving into each of these, we shed light on this coalition-building...
-
This paper synthesises the findings of a set of country studies commissioned by the RISE Programme to explore the influence of politics and power on education sector policymaking and implementation. The synthesis groups the countries into three political-institutional contexts: - Dominant contexts, where power is centred around a political leader and a hierarchical governance structure. As the Vietnam case details, top-down leadership potentially can provide a robust platform for improving...
-
In order to support the digital transformation of government operations Digital Learning Modules for Civil Servants are available, an off-the-shelf package of capacity development in form of replicable training modules to empower public servants at both the local and central government level to be leaders of digital transformation for delivering better public services. The modules cover a multitude of fundamental areas: comprehending digital government and services, human-centered design...
Explore
Theme
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
- Adaptive Learning (16)
- Adaptive Management (59)
- Agile & Lean approaches (6)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (3)
- Design Thinking / HCD (18)
- Doing Development Differently (4)
- Human Learning Systems (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (8)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (2)
- Other Adaptive approaches (4)
-
Other sectors
(2)
- Government (1)
- Organizational Management (1)
- Participation (3)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (5)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (25)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (17)
-
Sectors [+]
- Advocacy and Activism (1)
- Agriculture (1)
- Alternative Development (18)
- Cash Trasfers (1)
- Children (3)
- Citizen Engagement (5)
- Climate Change (4)
- Economic development (9)
- Education (4)
- Environmental Management (5)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (7)
- Gender (7)
- Governance and Accountability (21)
- Health (2)
- Humanitarian Aid (5)
-
Innovation (in Development)
(12)
- Funding (1)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (11)
- Institutional Reform (4)
- Knowledge to Practice (5)
- Locally driven development (5)
- Locally led development (2)
- NGOs (15)
- Organizational Change (8)
- Pastoralism (1)
- Peace Building (4)
- Scaling up / Propagating (13)
- Social Accountability (13)
- Technology (in Development) (13)
- Waste Management (1)
- Cases (28)
- Courses (2)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(36)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (7)
- GIZ (Germany) (4)
- ILO (1)
- Irish Aid (1)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- NGO Perspectives (7)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (1)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (3)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (1)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (2)
- USAID (9)
- World Bank (3)
-
Geography
(36)
-
Africa
(21)
- Central Africa (2)
- Eastern Africa (11)
- Northern Africa (1)
-
Southern Africa
(1)
- South Africa (1)
-
West Africa
(12)
- Nigeria (8)
- Senegal (1)
- Sierra Leone (3)
-
Americas
(3)
-
Central America
(2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (1)
- South America (3)
-
Central America
(2)
-
Asia
(17)
-
South-eastern Asia
(7)
- Cambodia (1)
- Indonesia (1)
- Myanmar (4)
- Philippines (1)
- Thailand (1)
- Timor Leste (1)
-
Southern Asia
(7)
- Bangladesh (3)
- India (1)
- Nepal (4)
- Pakistan (3)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
South-eastern Asia
(7)
-
Europe
(1)
-
Northern Europe
(1)
- United Kingdom (1)
-
Northern Europe
(1)
- Many geographies (1)
-
Oceania
(1)
- Melanesia (1)
-
Africa
(21)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(44)
- After Action Reviews (2)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Context Monitoring (1)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (1)
- Ex-post Evaluation (1)
- Impact evaluation (1)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (1)
- Innovation System Analysis (1)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (1)
- MEL in International Development (2)
- Outcome Harvesting (1)
- Outcome Mapping (1)
- Participatory Action Research (4)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (2)
- Political Economy Analysis (3)
- Portfolio Management (4)
- Process Tracing (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (1)
- Realist Evaluation (1)
- SenseMaker (1)
- Strategy testing (1)
- Surveys (1)
- Systemic Change (10)
- Systems Mapping (2)
- Theory-based evaluations (2)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (2)
- Value for Money (2)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (1)
-
Practical
(30)
- Tools (1)
Resource type
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(1)
-
Between 1990 and 1999
(1)
- 1998 (1)
-
Between 1990 and 1999
(1)
-
Between 2000 and 2024
(130)
-
Between 2000 and 2009
(1)
- 2003 (1)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (68)
- Between 2020 and 2024 (60)
-
Between 2030 and 2024
(1)
- 2034 (1)
-
Between 2000 and 2009
(1)