Your search
Results 77 resources
-
Thinking and acting politically is central to the SAVI programme. We support staff and partners to analyse the power relations that shape change in their state, and to use this knowledge to inform their decision-making. This includes decisions made by SAVI state teams relating to the issues and partners they engage with and support, and...
-
SAVI’s theory of change is a simple, practical guide that staff and partners use to plan and to monitor change – as well as to reflect on and enhance their own effectiveness. It sets out broad stages of attitude and behaviour change over time to facilitate effective citizen engagement in governance processes, systems and structures....
-
SAVI supports citizen engagement in governance through a facilitated partnership approach, in contrast to the usual approach of grants to civil society organisations (CSOs). The overall aim is to facilitate and support working relationships and processes of reform that are home-grown, self-sustaining and, after initial engagement, not dependent on external support. Our way of working...
-
In May 2016, SAVI transitioned into a successor programme – the ‘Engaged Citizens Pillar’ (ECP) of a wider DFID-funded governance reform programme ‘The Partnership to Engage, Reform and Learn’ (PERL). ECP is managed by the same service provider, Palladium, and the same core management team as SAVI, and many of the SAVI front line staff...
-
SAVI, a DFID funded programme implemented by Palladium, is an adaptive programme, aiming to put learning and adaptation at the centre of all decision-making. Learning and adaptation takes place in SAVI at three levels: the work of partners; the work of SAVI delivery teams; and the enabling environment of the programme as a whole. Achieving...
-
SAVI has established its own framework for assessing Value for Money in annual performance – in relation to expenditure, economy, efficiency, effectiveness and equity. Routine tracking and analysis of expenditure and economy ensure that inputs are supplied and services delivered to partners in line with SAVI’s core values, whilst also meeting DFID requirements and competing...
-
SAVI, is seeking to support processes of citizen engagement in governance in ways that are effective in influencing reform, and that are able to take on a life of their own without continuing donor support. SAVI is also an adaptive programme, putting learning and adaptation at the centre of all decision-making. Money is used and...
-
SAVI, a DFID funded programme implemented by Palladium, is an adaptive programme putting learning and adaptation at the centre of all decision-making. In relation to management and staffing SAVI has established the following approaches to facilitate this: – An adaptive approach to programme management: Full time strategic technical leadership, that works closely with and complements...
-
SAVI as a programme does not directly work with state governments – but we work in close conjunction with sister programmes who are supporting state governments on governance and sector reforms. SAVI supports non-government and SHoA partners to play their part in promoting more responsive, inclusive and accountable state governance delivering better services for citizens....
-
Governance reform is about government and citizens working together in more responsive, inclusive and accountable ways for the benefit of citizens. More responsive, inclusive and accountable attitudes and behaviour on the part of government and non-government stakeholders are the critical factors which lead to meaningful reform processes, and replicate and sustain reforms beyond the lifetime...
-
- This short paper draws out lessons for working effectively with and through partners, based on the experience of the Institutions for Inclusive Development (I4ID) programme – an adaptive, politically smart governance programme in Tanzania. • Cultivating effective partnerships can be a key part of delivering locally legitimate projects that have the potential to create sustainable change. Adaptive and politically informed ways of working create specific opportunities and challenges for...
-
Document description This document is currently being finalised and will be published shortly. Please try again soon. Recent research by The BEAM Exchange seeks to understand theoretical perspectives on how market systems approaches can contribute to inclusive economic development through systemic change. It produced three main insights. Economies are evolving systems, building on the mechanisms of variety creation, selection and amplification. Current economic performance, including...
-
This paper tracks the efforts of an Asia Foundation team and local stakeholders as they worked to support improvements in the solid waste management sector in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. The team worked in a flexible way with a range of partners, and with particular focus on understanding the incentives and politics affecting service delivery. While reform of the sector remains in progress, steps have been taken to introduce more competition and better public sector management of solid waste...
-
The CommunityFirst Framework is intended to be implemented by field teams at MSF. The theoretical aspects and evidence presented on the importance of community engagement are intended for all MSF staff seeking to learn more about why and how to shift the way we work with communities as humanitarians. We believe this guideline, and other tools like it (including OCA’s Person-Centred Approach Guidance07, and MSF Vienna Evaluation Unit’s Guidance for Involving Communities08), to be an important...
-
Coalitions—groups of organizations and individuals that work together to pursue a common policy goal or reform—are crucial to development. Some of The Asia Foundation’s longest-standing and most successful development programs and portfolios have used coalition-building as an implementation modality. This paper examines successful initiatives in Bangladesh, Nepal, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Timor-Leste. By delving into each of these, we shed light on this coalition-building...
-
In May 2016, SAVI transitioned into a successor programme – the ‘Engaged Citizens Pillar’ (ECP) of a wider DFID-funded governance reform programme ‘The Partnership to Engage, Reform and Learn’ (PERL). ECP is managed by the same service provider, Palladium, and the same core management team as SAVI, and many of the SAVI front line staff...
-
• This paper looks at the experience of gender mainstreaming in the Institutions for Inclusive Development (I4ID) programme – an adaptive, politically smart governance programme in Tanzania. • When development programmes try to engage with political stakeholders and align with the priorities of wider coalitions there is a danger that gender equality is de-prioritised. • It is important that formal political economy analysis, as well as other data collection, analysis and consultation...
-
The RAIN program experience affirms the importance of multi-year and flexible funding as key program design features if progress in resilience building is to be supported in areas with high levels of structural and temporal vulnerability. These features enable management to respond effectively to changing circumstances in order to better meet the needs of communities and to create the necessary conditions for relief-to-development strategies to take hold. Finally, this study found that...
-
This learning paper highlights how elements of outcome mapping were used by Save the Children Sweden in a project (2018-2020) that supports adolescents, affected by the Syria crisis, to become more resilient. The paper first outlines how the spheres of influence framework has been applied to develop an actor focused theory of change. It then describes how progress markers, as an alternative to SMART indicators, were formulated to monitor the programme’s results. The paper also outlines how...
Explore
Theme
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
- Adaptive Learning (3)
- Adaptive Management (49)
- Agile & Lean approaches (2)
- Design Thinking / HCD (1)
- Human Learning Systems (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (1)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (2)
- Other Adaptive approaches (1)
- Participation (1)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (1)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (1)
- Results Based Management (5)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (4)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (13)
-
Geography
-
Africa
(53)
-
Central Africa
(3)
- Angola (1)
- Cameroon (1)
- Democratic Republic of the Congo (1)
-
Eastern Africa
(18)
- Ethiopia (1)
- Kenya (2)
- Malawi (1)
- Mozambique (5)
- Rwanda (2)
- Somalia (1)
- Somaliland (1)
- South Sudan (1)
- Tanzania (5)
- Uganda (3)
- Zambia (1)
- Zimbabwe (3)
- Northern Africa (1)
-
Southern Africa
(3)
- South Africa (3)
-
West Africa
(38)
- Liberia (2)
- Nigeria (31)
- Senegal (1)
- Sierra Leone (4)
-
Central Africa
(3)
-
Americas
(4)
-
Central America
(2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (1)
-
North America
(1)
- Canada (1)
- South America (3)
-
Central America
(2)
-
Asia
(22)
-
South-eastern Asia
(8)
- Cambodia (1)
- Indonesia (1)
- Myanmar (5)
- Philippines (1)
- Thailand (1)
- Timor Leste (1)
-
Southern Asia
(11)
- Afghanistan (1)
- Bangladesh (4)
- India (2)
- Nepal (7)
- Pakistan (4)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
South-eastern Asia
(8)
-
Europe
(4)
-
Northern Europe
(2)
- United Kingdom (2)
-
Western Europe
(2)
- Netherlands (1)
- Switzerland (1)
-
Northern Europe
(2)
- Many geographies (2)
-
Oceania
(3)
- Australia and New Zealand (2)
- Melanesia (1)
-
Africa
(53)
- Cases (64)
- Courses (1)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(20)
- Canada - GAC & IDRC (1)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (6)
- Hivos - Netherlands (1)
- Irish Aid (1)
- New Zealand (1)
- NGO Perspectives (3)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (5)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (1)
- SDC - Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (1)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (1)
- USAID (2)
- World Bank (2)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(18)
- After Action Reviews (2)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Ex-post Evaluation (1)
- Impact evaluation (1)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (1)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- MEL in International Development (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (1)
- Outcome Mapping (1)
- Participatory Action Research (3)
- Portfolio Management (1)
- Strategy testing (1)
- Systemic Change (2)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (1)
- Value for Money (3)
- Practical (11)
-
Sectors [+]
(36)
- Agriculture (1)
- Alternative Development (2)
- Children (3)
- Citizen Engagement (1)
- Economic development (3)
- Education (3)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (6)
- Gender (5)
- Governance and Accountability (12)
- Humanitarian Aid (1)
- Innovation (in Development) (1)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (2)
- Institutional Reform (3)
- Knowledge to Practice (1)
- Locally driven development (3)
- NGOs (1)
- Organizational Change (1)
- Peace Building (3)
- Scaling up / Propagating (1)
- Social Accountability (6)
- Technology (in Development) (1)
- Waste Management (1)
Resource type
Publication year
-
Between 2000 and 2024
(77)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (49)
- Between 2020 and 2024 (27)
-
Between 2030 and 2024
(1)
- 2034 (1)