Your search
Results 97 resources
-
This briefing note shares practical learning on the use of contribution analysis for adaptive management (CA4AM). It examines how the approach enables programmes to work with theories of change in a practical, reflexive way, and how, combined with assessing evidence of a programme’s contribution to change, its findings can inform programme adaptation. It also examines both how and to what extent CA enables AM through the experiences of four large complex programmes all working towards...
-
Adaptive programmes recognise that certain changes, particularly in behaviours, are complex, non-linear and difficult to measure. This briefing note explores the use of outcome mapping (OM) as a monitoring, evaluation and learning (MEL) approach to track behavioural change and inform adaptation for two programmes: the Pathways to Resilience in Semi-arid Economies (PRISE) research consortium and the Accountability in Tanzania programme (AcT I and AcT II). It discusses the implementation of...
-
These Checklists for Exit along the Sustainability Project Cycle are based on lessons from ex-post evaluations that Valuing Voices has done or researched. Ex-post project completion evaluations are rare and even more so those that consulted partners and participants in the field about sustained impacts. Over $3.5 trillion has been spent on public foreign aid projects in the past 70 years (OECD 2019) yet we have evaluated less than 1% of these projects for sustainability. Our Valuing Voices...
-
There is a growing emphasis among NGOs and donors on ensuring that the voices of beneficiaries are heard. A range of beneficiary feedback mechanisms (BFMs) exist which enable beneficiary perspectives and suggestions to be gathered and used within an M&E system. BFMs are tools designed to enable a continuous cycle of interaction between those receiving and those delivering aid-funded interventions.
-
Theory of Change is thought to be very useful for learning and adaptive management of complex interventions such as advocacy. Nevertheless, the use of Theory of Change is also under critique. One common criticism is that Theory of Change is often used as a framework that fixes agreements rather than as a living, guiding tool that helps reflection and adaptation. However, while such criticism stresses forms of control, little research has looked at the way Theory of Change and advocacy...
-
when it was reduced to a subsidiary internal service lacking all kind of political attributions. The work done in those years had been formidable, but too many things had passed since, especially the 15M Spanish Indignados Movement, the raise of technopolitics… and the raise of populism and fascism all across Europe. We urgently needed a theoretical framework in which to substantiate our political strategy, so I came up with a Theory of Change of citizen participation (see Figure 1) which...
-
Most people agree that monitoring and evaluation (M&E) should be used for both learning and accountability. However, there is no consensus about which one is more important. The debate matters as there is sometimes tension between the two purposes. In the past there has often been a disconnect between M&E and learning. Many M&E systems are primarily designed to enable accountability to donors.
-
USAID maintains staff and operations in more than 80 countries around the world, all of which the COVID-19 pandemic will disrupt. USAID remains committed to protecting the health and safety of our staff, while continuing appropriate oversight of our programs and ensuring the accountable and effective use of U.S. taxpayer funds. In the current operating environment, USAID and implementing partners face new challenges in implementing activities, monitoring progress, collecting data, and...
-
Pressure is mounting on international development cooperation agencies to prove the impact of their work. Private and public commissioners as well as the general public are increasingly asking for robust evidence of impact. In this context, rigorous impact evaluation (RIE) methods are increasingly receiving attention within the broader German development system and in GIZ. Compared to other implementing agencies such as DFID or USAid, the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale...
-
Rigorous Impact Evaluation in GIZ Governance Programmes (How-To-Note)von Schiller, A. - 2020 - Bonn
Why should I integrate an impact assessment in my programme? How will the programme benefit from it? Are the benefits worth the effort and expenses? How do I design and implement it in detail? Who is addressable for support? What should I pay attention to in order to get the most out of it? This note is meant to answer these questions. It addresses leaders and project staff of governance programmes who are interested in using this tool within their specific governance programme or project....
-
This briefing note looks at how the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Wildlife Asia programme has operationalised the concepts of adaptive rigour and adaptive management as part of its approach to collaborating, learning and adapting. As described by the Global Learning for Adaptive Management (GLAM) initiative, adaptive rigour is about ensuring that the data, information, methods, processes and systems that underpin adaptive management are robust, systematic and...
-
This briefing note focuses on the remote collection and use of data for adaptive management during the Covid-19 pandemic, setting out key considerations to help practitioners think through a transition from more ‘traditional’ monitoring, evaluation and learning (MEL) to MEL for adaptive management (MEL4AM) that reflects the unique data collection challenges presented by Covid-19. The brief provides an overview of some key considerations in remote data collection, when this is required, and...
-
Considerations for planning a post project evaluation during the project, at the end, or after it has closed.
-
This document explores how organisations can measure the level of influence that they had over an outcome. It summarises influence in terms of the significance of the outcome, the level of contribution and the strength of evidence.
-
Research on empowerment and accountability tends to focus on collective action and its potential for empowering citizens undertaking the action and on achieving state accountability. In fragile, conflict and violence-affected settings (FCVAS) collective action is rare and risky. So how do citizens, particularly the chronically poor and most marginalised, interact and make claims on the different public authorities that exist in these settings, and how do these interactions contribute to...
-
- This short paper draws out lessons for working effectively with and through partners, based on the experience of the Institutions for Inclusive Development (I4ID) programme – an adaptive, politically smart governance programme in Tanzania. • Cultivating effective partnerships can be a key part of delivering locally legitimate projects that have the potential to create sustainable change. Adaptive and politically informed ways of working create specific opportunities and challenges for...
-
Internal and external stakeholders have different information needs over a project’s life, for purposes that include adaptive management, accountability, compliance, reporting and learning. A project’s monitoring, evaluation, accountability and learning, or MEAL, system should provide the information needed by these stakeholders at the level of statistical reliability, detail and timing appropriate to inform data use. In emergency contexts where the situation is still fluid, ‘informal...
-
In September of 2014, USAID’s Office of Learning, Evaluation & Research (LER) awarded the Learning and Knowledge Management (LEARN) contract to Dexis Consulting Group and subcontractor RTI International.1 This document—the End of Contract Report—captures five and half years of results and reflections for our stakeholders. Our intention is to share the good and the bad, and while this report would not be considered a “tell all,” we think we have a story worth sharing, particularly to USAID...
-
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly shifted the context in which aid and development is being delivered. The global scale of the pandemic and the speed at which it is spreading mean that the ‘normal’ economic, ideological and organisational influences which shape (if not determine) aid delivery are in flux. This means that – for a relatively short-period – there is scope for aid actors to work collectively to embed more locally-led, politically-informed and adaptive forms of MERL in aid...
Explore
Theme
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (2)
- After Action Reviews (2)
- Beneficiary Assessment/Engagement (3)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Circular charts applications (radar, pie, sunburst, spiderweb, orbic, etc) (1)
- Context Monitoring (1)
- Contribution Analysis (3)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (1)
- Diaries (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (1)
- Evaluability assessment (1)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (2)
- Ex-post Evaluation (2)
- Feedback Systems (3)
- Impact evaluation (3)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (2)
- Innovation System Analysis (1)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (2)
- MEL Bricolage (1)
- MEL in International Development (8)
- Narrative Based Approaches (1)
- Network Analysis (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (1)
- Outcome Mapping (3)
- Participatory Action Research (6)
- Participatory Evaluation (2)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (1)
- Political Economy Analysis (3)
- Portfolio Management (5)
- Positive Deviance (2)
- Post Project Evaluations (1)
- Process Tracing (3)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (4)
- Realist Evaluation (1)
- Remote Monitoring (1)
- Rigour (2)
- Rubrics (6)
- SenseMaker (1)
- Stakeholder analysis (1)
- Strategy testing (1)
- Surveys (1)
- Sustainability (3)
- Systemic Change (20)
- Systems Mapping (4)
- Tech 4 MEL (4)
- Theory-based evaluations (2)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (7)
- Value for Investment (1)
- Value for Money (3)
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(54)
- Adaptive Learning (9)
- Adaptive Management (20)
- Adaptive Rigour (1)
- Agile & Lean approaches (1)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (4)
- Design Thinking / HCD (2)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (4)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (1)
- Participation (2)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (3)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (21)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (3)
- Cases (15)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(30)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (7)
- GIZ (Germany) (5)
- Hivos - Netherlands (1)
- Irish Aid (1)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- NGO Perspectives (6)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (1)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (2)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (1)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (3)
- USAID (9)
-
Geography
(21)
-
Africa
(12)
-
Central Africa
(1)
- Angola (1)
- Eastern Africa (11)
- Northern Africa (2)
-
Southern Africa
(1)
- South Africa (1)
-
West Africa
(8)
- Benim (1)
- Niger (2)
- Nigeria (3)
- Senegal (1)
- Sierra Leone (1)
-
Central Africa
(1)
-
Americas
(5)
-
Central America
(4)
- Ecuador (2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (3)
- South America (3)
-
Central America
(4)
-
Asia
(14)
-
South-eastern Asia
(1)
- Indonesia (1)
-
Southern Asia
(10)
- Bangladesh (5)
- India (1)
- Nepal (6)
- Pakistan (3)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
South-eastern Asia
(1)
-
Europe
(2)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
- Spain (1)
-
Western Europe
(1)
- Germany (1)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
-
Africa
(12)
-
Practical
(24)
- Tools (1)
-
Sectors [+]
(42)
- Agriculture (1)
- Alternative Development (2)
- Cash Trasfers (1)
- Children (7)
- Citizen Engagement (1)
- Climate Change (2)
- Economic development (5)
- Education (3)
- Employment (1)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (2)
- Gender (2)
- Governance and Accountability (10)
- Humanitarian Aid (2)
- Innovation (in Development) (4)
- Knowledge to Practice (3)
- Locally driven development (1)
- Organizational Change (3)
- Peace Building (1)
- Scaling up / Propagating (4)
- Social Accountability (1)