Your search
Results 32 resources
-
How can donors and grantees work together to create effective monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) practices that drive field-wide transformation?
-
Nearly all challenges in international development tend to be complex because they depend on constantly evolving human behaviour, systems, and contexts, involving multiple actors, entities, and processes. As a result, both the discovery and scaling of innovations to address challenges in development often involve changes in system behaviour or even system-level transformation. This is rarely a linear process over time and can result in unexpected outcomes. Existing evaluation techniques...
-
Collaborative Learning — an approach which brings together people who face common challenges to share knowledge and jointly problem-solve — is a powerful way to support locally-led development and achieve impact. It provides a structured process in which change agents determine priorities, set the learning agenda, work together to identify strategies to address complex challenges, and provide ongoing implementation support to one another. Collaborative Learning — unlike traditional...
-
Effective learning is a key driver of market systems change, with the potential to enhance system competitiveness, resilience, and inclusiveness. Shifting the Locus of Learning: Catalyzing Private Sector Learning to Drive Systemic Change recently outlined a rationale for enhancing the scale and quality of learning in a system and identifying 10 strategies programs can contextualize to catalyze learning. These strategies are also backed with robust examples from 13 programs doing this work...
-
Diverse approaches to promoting disability inclusive employment aim to transform workplaces into truly inclusive environments, usually with intervention strategies targeting two main groups: employers and jobseekers with disabilities. However, they do not always consider other relevant stakeholders or address the relationships and interactions between diverse actors in the wider social ecosystem. These approaches often neglect deeper ‘vexing’ difficulties which block progress towards...
-
Calls for more ‘adaptive programming’ have been prominent in international development practice for over a decade. Learning-by-doing is a crucial element of this, but programmes have often found it challenging to become more learning oriented. Establishing some form of reflective practice, against countervailing incentives, is difficult. Incorporating data collection processes that generate useful, timely and practical information to inform these reflections is even more so.This paper...
-
Doing development differently rests on deliberate efforts to reflect and learn, not just about what programmes are doing and achieving, but about how they are working. This is particularly important for an action research programme like Child Labour: Action- Research-Innovation in South and South-Eastern Asia (CLARISSA), which is implemented by a consortium of organisations from across the research and development spectrum, during a rapidly changing global pandemic. Harnessing the potential...
-
Our new guide provides practical advice to help any organisation working in public service apply the Human Learning Systems approach to their work. In doing so, they will be better equipped to explore, learn and respond to the unique strengths and needs of each person, family and community they serve.
-
This paper presents the case for systemic organisational change in the humanitarian system. The paper firstly shows that that organisational learning has tended to reinforce existing ways of working and has not been able to shift a culture that values action over reflection. As a result, the rest of the paper asks about the most significant changes in the humanitarian sector
-
This scoping paper explores the question ‘what would it take to build a culture of learning at scale?’. It focuses on systems-wide learning that can help to inform systems change efforts in complex contexts. To answer this question, literature was reviewed from across diverse disciplines and the realms of education, innovation systems, systems thinking and knowledge management. This inquiry was also supported by in-depth interviews with numerous specialists from the for-purpose sector and...
-
Development cooperation has spent decades wrangling over the merits, evidence, and implications of what we may term “the learning hypothesis”: the idea that increased knowledge by development organisations must logically lead to increased effectiveness in the performance of their development activities. Organisations of all stripes have built research and monitoring and evaluation (M&E) departments, adopted a multitude of knowledge management systems and tools, and tinkered with...
-
In September of 2014, USAID’s Office of Learning, Evaluation & Research (LER) awarded the Learning and Knowledge Management (LEARN) contract to Dexis Consulting Group and subcontractor RTI International.1 This document—the End of Contract Report—captures five and half years of results and reflections for our stakeholders. Our intention is to share the good and the bad, and while this report would not be considered a “tell all,” we think we have a story worth sharing, particularly to USAID...
-
CARE's Failing Forward initiative is sparking opportunities to showcase the ideas that don't work so we can spend more time implementing the ones that do. It's changing the conversation inside the organization, and leading to changes in the way we design and implement programs.
-
This dissertation examines when initiatives by International Development Organizations (IDOs) are more, and less, successful. The core argument is that allowing field-level agents to drive initiatives – what I call organizational Navigation by Judgment – will often be the most effective way to deliver aid. This inverts what a classical application of the principal agent model – the workhorse of studies of public management and bureaucracy – would predict, with better performance resulting...
-
This technical analysis explores previous and ongoing social learning efforts, best practices, challenges, and lessons in USAID as a foundation for improving the implementation and design of the Agency’s forestry and biodiversity programs. This analysis is particularly relevant as the Bureau of Economic Growth, Education and the Environment’s Office of Forestry and Biodiversity (E3/FAB) begins to develop a Cross-Mission Learning Program under the Measuring Impact initiative, a five-year...
-
Learning is fundamental to work on transparency and accountability in complex environments. But how can funding practices best support learning?
-
This report is the second in a program of evaluations that the Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) is conducting on the learning that takes place through World Bank projects. Learning and knowledge are treated as parts of a whole and are presumed to be mutually reinforcing.
-
9 propositions can help evaluators measure progress on complex social problems.
-
IN 2013, the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies (RUSI) was awarded a grant under the Kanishka Project to develop a handbook for monitoring and evaluating counter violent extremism (CVE) policies and programmes. The aim of this handbook is to support CVE policy-makers and practitioners (those who design, manage and evaluate CVE programmes), by providing them with key terms regarding violent extremism and radicalisation, describing the purpose of evaluation, and...
Explore
Theme
- Adaptive Approaches [+]
-
Sectors [+]
- Alternative Development (11)
- Children (1)
- Citizen Engagement (1)
- Combatting violent extremism (1)
- Economic development (2)
- Employment (1)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (1)
- Gender (1)
- Governance and Accountability (4)
- Humanitarian Aid (1)
- Inclusion/Disability (1)
- Innovation (in Development) (2)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (2)
- Institutional Reform (1)
- Knowledge to Practice (5)
- Locally led development (1)
- NGOs (2)
- Organizational Change (5)
- Rural development (2)
- Scaling up / Propagating (1)
- Social Accountability (3)
- Cases (4)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(7)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (2)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (1)
- USAID (2)
- World Bank (2)
-
Geography
(5)
-
Africa
(2)
-
Eastern Africa
(2)
- Kenya (1)
- Mozambique (1)
- Uganda (1)
-
West Africa
(1)
- Nigeria (1)
-
Eastern Africa
(2)
-
Asia
(2)
-
Southern Asia
(2)
- Bangladesh (2)
- Nepal (1)
-
Southern Asia
(2)
-
Europe
(1)
-
Northern Europe
(1)
- United Kingdom (1)
-
Northern Europe
(1)
-
Oceania
(1)
-
Melanesia
(1)
- Papua New Guinea (1)
-
Melanesia
(1)
-
Africa
(2)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(14)
- After Action Reviews (2)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Contribution Analysis (1)
- Cost-Benefit Analysis (1)
- Delphi Survey (1)
- Focus Group Discussions (1)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (1)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowledge Management (1)
- Logical Framework (1)
- MEL in International Development (3)
- Participatory Action Research (2)
- Participatory Evaluation (1)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (1)
- Portfolio Management (1)
- Process Tracing (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (1)
- Realist Evaluation (1)
- Strategy testing (1)
- SWOT Analysis (1)
- Systemic Change (2)
- Systems Mapping (1)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (2)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (1)
- Practical (5)
Resource type
- Blog Post (3)
- Book (5)
- Journal Article (6)
- Report (16)
- Thesis (2)
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(5)
-
Between 1970 and 1979
(1)
- 1975 (1)
- Between 1980 and 1989 (2)
-
Between 1990 and 1999
(2)
- 1998 (2)
-
Between 1970 and 1979
(1)
-
Between 2000 and 2024
(27)
- Between 2000 and 2009 (5)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (10)
- Between 2020 and 2024 (12)