Your search
Results 249 resources
-
Amplifying the impact of sustainability initiatives to foster transformations in urban and rural contexts, has received increasing attention in resilience, social innovation, and sustainability transitions research. We review the literature on amplification frameworks and propose an integrative typology of eight processes, which aim to increase the impact of such initiatives. The eight amplification processes are: stabilizing, speeding up, growing, replicating, transferring, spreading,...
-
Scaling Impact introduces a new and practical approach to scaling the positive impacts of research and innovation. Inspired by leading scientific and entrepreneurial innovators from across Africa, Asia, the Caribbean, Latin America, and the Middle East, this book presents a synthesis of unrivalled diversity and grounded ingenuity. The result is a different perspective on how to achieve impact that matters, and an important challenge to the predominant more-is-better paradigm of scaling. For...
-
Nearly three years ago we wrote about the “Missing Middle” in the innovation lifecycle[i], a gap that kept successful pilot programs from reaching the goal of replication and optimization in multiple contexts. Since then, scaling humanitarian innovation has received a great deal of attention from the sector, with a number of new initiatives specifically focused on the scaling challenge.
-
This working paper argues that the growing field of transparency, participation and accountability (TPA) needs a conceptual reboot, to address the limited traction gained so far on the path to accountability. To inform more strategic approaches and to identify the drivers of more sustainable institutional change, fresh analytical work is needed. This paper makes the case for one among several possible strategic approaches by distinguishing between “scaling up” and “taking scale into...
-
The Scale Up Sourcebook is informed and inspired by the September 2018 conference, Innovations in Agriculture: Scaling Up to Reach Millions, organized by Purdue University, in partnership with the African Development Bank. The Sourcebook consolidates, extends, and disseminates some of the scaling insights presented at the Purdue conference. It is intended as an easy-to-use guidebook targeted to a broad and diverse audience of stakeholders associated with scaling agricultural technologies and...
-
- This short paper draws out lessons for working effectively with and through partners, based on the experience of the Institutions for Inclusive Development (I4ID) programme – an adaptive, politically smart governance programme in Tanzania. • Cultivating effective partnerships can be a key part of delivering locally legitimate projects that have the potential to create sustainable change. Adaptive and politically informed ways of working create specific opportunities and challenges for...
-
The Governance Practitioner’s Notebook takes an unusual approach for the OECD-DAC Network on Governance (GovNet). It brings together a collection of specially written notes aimed at those who work as governance practitioners within development agencies. It does so, however, without attempting to offer definitive guidance – instead aiming to stimulate thinking and debate. To aid this process the book is centred on a fictional Governance Adviser. The Notebook’s format provides space for...
-
This paper tracks the efforts of an Asia Foundation team and local stakeholders as they worked to support improvements in the solid waste management sector in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. The team worked in a flexible way with a range of partners, and with particular focus on understanding the incentives and politics affecting service delivery. While reform of the sector remains in progress, steps have been taken to introduce more competition and better public sector management of solid waste...
-
Introduction and rationale The concept of a value chain is increasingly being applied in the design and implementation of development programs aimed at poverty reduction. As an analytical tool, it provides a useful framework for understanding key activities, relationships, and mechanisms that allow producers, processors, buyers, sellers, and consumers—separated by time and space—to gradually add value to products and services as they pass from one link of the chain to another, making it a...
-
Check out this video to see what’s inside our new resource: Practitioners' Guidance to Assessing Systems Change, developed by MEL Managers for MEL Managers. (Check out the Guidance here https://bit.ly/MSPMELClinics.) Hear from the authors about which parts they love the most and how this guide challenges MEL managers to assess systems change as an ongoing aspect of implementation, generating feedback that teams need to better understand and catalyze change, for more impact.
-
Polycentricity is a fundamental concept in commons scholarship that connotes a complex form of governance with multiple centers of semiautonomous decision making. If the decision-making centers take each other into account in competitive and cooperative relationships and have recourse to conflict resolution mechanisms, they may be regarded as a polycentric governance system. In the context of natural resource governance, commons scholars have ascribed a number of advantages to polycentric...
-
By Alan Hudson, Executive Director, Global Integrity, July 26, 2016 Politics matters. Context too. And blueprints have limited value. Our strategy is based on these insights, so we’re totally on board. A World Development Report (WDR) that puts power and politics...
-
Politically smart, locally led development (Discussion Paper)Booth, D., & Unsworth, S. - 2014 - ODI
Aid donors have found it hard to move from thinking politically to working differently, but there is evidence that they can do so and that this improves outcomes. This paper presents seven examples of where adopting a politically smart, locally led approach has led to better outcomes.
-
This report summarises the discussions at a meeting held in September 2019 of a group of global development research and policy experts and practitioners, convened by ODI and the Westminster Foundation for Democracy, to share experiences and knowledge, reflect on what we already know about working politically on gender in fragile and conflict-affected settings (FCAS), and identify what further evidence would be useful. Key messages: - It is important to identify, document and learn from...
Explore
Theme
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
- Adaptive Learning (32)
- Adaptive Management (104)
- Adaptive Rigour (1)
- Agile & Lean approaches (9)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (3)
- Design Thinking / HCD (50)
- Doing Development Differently (6)
- Human Learning Systems (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (10)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (2)
- Other Adaptive approaches (6)
-
Other sectors
(6)
- Activism and Social Movements (1)
- Government (1)
- Organizational Management (2)
- Project management (2)
- Sport (1)
- Participation (3)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (4)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (9)
- Positive Deviance & 2 loops model (1)
- Results Based Management (1)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (39)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (25)
-
Sectors [+]
- Advocacy and Activism (1)
- Agriculture (3)
- Alternative Development (57)
- Cash Trasfers (1)
- Children (3)
- Citizen Engagement (12)
- Climate Change (4)
- Combatting violent extremism (1)
- Economic development (11)
- Education (4)
- Employment (1)
- Environmental Management (11)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (9)
- Gender (7)
- Governance and Accountability (33)
- Health (7)
- Humanitarian Aid (5)
- Inclusion/Disability (1)
-
Innovation (in Development)
(20)
- Funding (1)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (13)
- Institutional Reform (5)
- Knowledge to Practice (11)
- Land Reform (1)
- Locally driven development (5)
- Locally led development (3)
- NGOs (18)
- Organizational Change (11)
- Pastoralism (1)
- Peace Building (9)
- Research for Development (R4D) (1)
- Rural development (6)
- Scaling up / Propagating (20)
- Social Accountability (18)
- Social Change (2)
-
Technology (in Development)
(38)
- Appropriate Tech (6)
- Waste Management (1)
- Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) (1)
- Cases (42)
- Courses (2)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(50)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- Canada - GAC & IDRC (2)
- China (3)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (8)
- GIZ (Germany) (4)
- IFAD (1)
- ILO (1)
- Irish Aid (1)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- NGO Perspectives (9)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (1)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (3)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (2)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (2)
- USAID (11)
- WFP (1)
- World Bank (7)
-
Geography
(50)
-
Africa
(29)
- Central Africa (4)
-
Eastern Africa
(17)
- Kenya (2)
- Mozambique (4)
- Rwanda (2)
- Somalia (2)
- South Sudan (1)
- Tanzania (3)
- Uganda (4)
- Zimbabwe (3)
- Northern Africa (1)
-
Southern Africa
(1)
- South Africa (1)
-
West Africa
(14)
- Mali (1)
- Nigeria (9)
- Senegal (1)
- Sierra Leone (3)
-
Americas
(4)
-
Central America
(2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (1)
- South America (4)
-
Central America
(2)
-
Asia
(24)
-
Eastern Asia
(2)
- China (2)
-
South-eastern Asia
(10)
- Cambodia (3)
- Indonesia (1)
- Lao People's Democratic Republic (1)
- Myanmar (5)
- Philippines (1)
- Thailand (1)
- Timor Leste (1)
- Viet Nam (2)
-
Southern Asia
(9)
- Bangladesh (5)
- India (1)
- Nepal (4)
- Pakistan (3)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Eastern Asia
(2)
-
Europe
(1)
-
Northern Europe
(1)
- United Kingdom (1)
-
Northern Europe
(1)
- Many geographies (1)
-
Oceania
(2)
-
Melanesia
(2)
- Papua New Guinea (1)
-
Melanesia
(2)
-
Africa
(29)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(63)
- After Action Reviews (2)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Context Monitoring (1)
- Contribution Analysis (2)
- Cost-Benefit Analysis (1)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Delphi Survey (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (1)
- Ex-post Evaluation (1)
- Focus Group Discussions (1)
- Impact evaluation (2)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (1)
- Innovation System Analysis (1)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (1)
- Logical Framework (2)
- MEL in International Development (7)
- Most Significant Change (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (1)
- Outcome Mapping (1)
- Participatory Action Research (6)
- Participatory Evaluation (1)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (2)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (1)
- Political Economy Analysis (4)
- Portfolio Management (4)
- Power Analysis (1)
- Process Tracing (2)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (1)
- Realist Evaluation (2)
- Scenario Planning (1)
- SenseMaker (1)
- Strategy testing (1)
- Surveys (1)
- SWOT Analysis (1)
- Systemic Change (12)
- Systems Mapping (5)
- Theory-based evaluations (3)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (3)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (1)
- Value for Money (2)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (4)
-
Practical
(35)
- Tools (3)
Resource type
- Blog Post (14)
- Book (29)
- Book Section (10)
- Conference Paper (5)
- Journal Article (46)
- Magazine Article (3)
- Presentation (1)
- Report (131)
- Thesis (4)
- Video Recording (1)
- Web Page (5)
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(17)
-
Between 1940 and 1949
(1)
- 1948 (1)
-
Between 1960 and 1969
(1)
- 1967 (1)
- Between 1970 and 1979 (2)
- Between 1980 and 1989 (6)
- Between 1990 and 1999 (7)
-
Between 1940 and 1949
(1)
-
Between 2000 and 2024
(232)
- Between 2000 and 2009 (14)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (129)
- Between 2020 and 2024 (88)
-
Between 2030 and 2024
(1)
- 2034 (1)