Your search
Results 101 resources
-
The overall aim of SAVI engagement with the media is for media representation of citizens’ interests to become normal, and play its part in helping state governments to be more responsive, inclusive and accountable to their citizens. Media partners – individual media personnel and selected media houses – are supported to be more effective agents...
-
We promote attention to gender equality and social inclusion in all of our engagement with CS groups, the media and SHoAs, and in all of the issues and processes they work on. In all the states we work in, we also support partners to focus on some issues and form some partnerships and networks which...
-
SAVI state teams provide support to CS groups to become more effective agents of citizens’ voice and public accountability, through a variety of mutually reinforcing interventions. These include: hands-on support to demonstration civil society Advocacy Partnerships (APs) facilitating working partnerships between civil society APs, SHoAs, and the media brokering working relationships between all of these...
-
SAVI aims to facilitate replicable and sustainable processes of citizen engagement in governance. The programme in each state is locally defined, flexible and adaptive, and results are not predictable in advance. Standardised monitoring tools are not applicable, and consequently we have evolved our tools and frameworks during the programme through processes of learning by doing....
-
Thinking and acting politically is central to the SAVI programme. We support staff and partners to analyse the power relations that shape change in their state, and to use this knowledge to inform their decision-making. This includes decisions made by SAVI state teams relating to the issues and partners they engage with and support, and...
-
SAVI’s theory of change is a simple, practical guide that staff and partners use to plan and to monitor change – as well as to reflect on and enhance their own effectiveness. It sets out broad stages of attitude and behaviour change over time to facilitate effective citizen engagement in governance processes, systems and structures....
-
SAVI supports citizen engagement in governance through a facilitated partnership approach, in contrast to the usual approach of grants to civil society organisations (CSOs). The overall aim is to facilitate and support working relationships and processes of reform that are home-grown, self-sustaining and, after initial engagement, not dependent on external support. Our way of working...
-
In May 2016, SAVI transitioned into a successor programme – the ‘Engaged Citizens Pillar’ (ECP) of a wider DFID-funded governance reform programme ‘The Partnership to Engage, Reform and Learn’ (PERL). ECP is managed by the same service provider, Palladium, and the same core management team as SAVI, and many of the SAVI front line staff...
-
SAVI, a DFID funded programme implemented by Palladium, is an adaptive programme, aiming to put learning and adaptation at the centre of all decision-making. Learning and adaptation takes place in SAVI at three levels: the work of partners; the work of SAVI delivery teams; and the enabling environment of the programme as a whole. Achieving...
-
SAVI has established its own framework for assessing Value for Money in annual performance – in relation to expenditure, economy, efficiency, effectiveness and equity. Routine tracking and analysis of expenditure and economy ensure that inputs are supplied and services delivered to partners in line with SAVI’s core values, whilst also meeting DFID requirements and competing...
-
SAVI, is seeking to support processes of citizen engagement in governance in ways that are effective in influencing reform, and that are able to take on a life of their own without continuing donor support. SAVI is also an adaptive programme, putting learning and adaptation at the centre of all decision-making. Money is used and...
-
SAVI, a DFID funded programme implemented by Palladium, is an adaptive programme putting learning and adaptation at the centre of all decision-making. In relation to management and staffing SAVI has established the following approaches to facilitate this: – An adaptive approach to programme management: Full time strategic technical leadership, that works closely with and complements...
-
SAVI as a programme does not directly work with state governments – but we work in close conjunction with sister programmes who are supporting state governments on governance and sector reforms. SAVI supports non-government and SHoA partners to play their part in promoting more responsive, inclusive and accountable state governance delivering better services for citizens....
-
Governance reform is about government and citizens working together in more responsive, inclusive and accountable ways for the benefit of citizens. More responsive, inclusive and accountable attitudes and behaviour on the part of government and non-government stakeholders are the critical factors which lead to meaningful reform processes, and replicate and sustain reforms beyond the lifetime...
-
Abstract Motivation On December 15, 2012 Sombath Somphone was abducted at a police checkpoint in his home city of Vientiane, the capital of Laos; his whereabouts remain unknown. This article considers his work and disappearance through the lens of Thinking and Working Politically (TWP) approaches to development. The article is supportive of TWP, but emphasizes the significant risks of politicized programming in authoritarian contexts. Purpose By examining the case of Sombath Somphone, the...
-
Document description This document is currently being finalised and will be published shortly. Please try again soon. Recent research by The BEAM Exchange seeks to understand theoretical perspectives on how market systems approaches can contribute to inclusive economic development through systemic change. It produced three main insights. Economies are evolving systems, building on the mechanisms of variety creation, selection and amplification. Current economic performance, including...
-
This paper tracks the efforts of an Asia Foundation team and local stakeholders as they worked to support improvements in the solid waste management sector in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. The team worked in a flexible way with a range of partners, and with particular focus on understanding the incentives and politics affecting service delivery. While reform of the sector remains in progress, steps have been taken to introduce more competition and better public sector management of solid waste...
-
In order to help enhance the effectiveness of donors and development practitioners on the ground, LASER has produced a range of practical guidance and tools. These are primarily intended for the international development community engaged in designing and implementing investment climate programmes, though can also be used more widely by other stakeholders across sectors. General guidance and tools: Politically smart approaches to donor investment climate programming (and annexes) Revised...
-
There are increasing criticisms of dominant models for scaling up health systems in developing countries and a recognition that approaches are needed that better take into account the complexity of health interventions. Since Reform and Opening in the late 1970s, Chinese government has managed complex, rapid and intersecting reforms across many policy areas. As with reforms in other policy areas, reform of the health system has been through a process of trial and error. There is increasing...
Explore
Theme
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
- Adaptive Learning (6)
- Adaptive Management (67)
- Capacity WORKS (1)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (3)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (1)
- Other Adaptive approaches (1)
-
Other sectors
(2)
- Project management (1)
- Sport (1)
- Participation (2)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (3)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (2)
- Results Based Management (9)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (7)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (15)
- Cases
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(35)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- Canada - GAC & IDRC (1)
- China (3)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (13)
- GIZ (Germany) (2)
- Hivos - Netherlands (1)
- IFAD (1)
- Irish Aid (1)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- New Zealand (1)
- NGO Perspectives (1)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (9)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (1)
- SDC - Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (1)
- SIDA - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (2)
- USAID (5)
- WFP (1)
- World Bank (4)
-
Geography
(79)
-
Africa
(53)
-
Central Africa
(4)
- Angola (1)
- Cameroon (1)
- Democratic Republic of the Congo (2)
-
Eastern Africa
(17)
- Ethiopia (1)
- Kenya (3)
- Malawi (1)
- Mozambique (3)
- Rwanda (2)
- Somalia (2)
- Somaliland (1)
- South Sudan (1)
- Tanzania (2)
- Uganda (5)
- Zambia (1)
- Zimbabwe (4)
- Northern Africa (1)
-
Southern Africa
(3)
- South Africa (3)
-
West Africa
(38)
- Liberia (2)
- Nigeria (32)
- Senegal (1)
- Sierra Leone (3)
-
Central Africa
(4)
-
Americas
(5)
-
Central America
(3)
- Costa Rica (1)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (1)
-
North America
(2)
- Canada (2)
- United States of America (1)
- South America (2)
-
Central America
(3)
-
Asia
(25)
-
Eastern Asia
(2)
- China (2)
-
South-eastern Asia
(10)
- Cambodia (3)
- Indonesia (1)
- Lao People's Democratic Republic (2)
- Myanmar (5)
- Viet Nam (2)
-
Southern Asia
(10)
- Afghanistan (1)
- Bangladesh (4)
- India (2)
- Nepal (6)
- Pakistan (3)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Eastern Asia
(2)
-
Europe
(4)
-
Eastern Europe
(1)
- Ukraine (1)
-
Northern Europe
(1)
- United Kingdom (1)
-
Western Europe
(3)
- France (1)
- Netherlands (1)
- Switzerland (1)
-
Eastern Europe
(1)
- Many geographies (2)
-
Oceania
(3)
- Australia and New Zealand (1)
-
Melanesia
(2)
- Papua New Guinea (1)
-
Africa
(53)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(26)
- After Action Reviews (2)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Contribution Analysis (2)
- Cost-Benefit Analysis (1)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Delphi Survey (1)
- Ex-post Evaluation (1)
- Focus Group Discussions (1)
- Impact evaluation (1)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (1)
- Innovation System Analysis (1)
- Logical Framework (1)
- MEL in International Development (2)
- Outcome Harvesting (1)
- Outcome Mapping (1)
- Participatory Action Research (4)
- Participatory Evaluation (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (1)
- Power Analysis (1)
- Process Tracing (1)
- Realist Evaluation (1)
- Strategy testing (1)
- SWOT Analysis (1)
- Systemic Change (1)
- Systems Mapping (1)
- Theory-based evaluations (1)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (1)
- Trans-disciplinary Research (1)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (1)
- Value for Money (2)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (1)
-
Practical
(11)
- Tools (2)
-
Sectors [+]
(42)
- Advocacy and Activism (1)
- Agriculture (3)
- Alternative Development (2)
- Children (3)
- Citizen Engagement (1)
- Combatting violent extremism (1)
- Economic development (5)
- Education (1)
- Environmental Management (1)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (7)
- Gender (5)
- Governance and Accountability (12)
- Health (2)
- Innovation (in Development) (1)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (1)
- Institutional Reform (1)
- Knowledge to Practice (1)
- Land Reform (1)
- NGOs (1)
- Peace Building (4)
- Research for Development (R4D) (1)
- Rural development (1)
- Scaling up / Propagating (2)
- Social Accountability (5)
- Waste Management (1)
Resource type
- Book (3)
- Book Section (2)
- Conference Paper (1)
- Journal Article (11)
- Report (81)
- Thesis (1)
- Video Recording (1)
- Web Page (1)
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(1)
-
Between 1980 and 1989
(1)
- 1989 (1)
-
Between 1980 and 1989
(1)
- Between 2000 and 2024 (100)