Your search
Results 65 resources
-
This provides a general description of GIZ’s new evaluation system, which is designed to implement our new policy and to achieve the objectives of evaluation reform. This general description is accompanied by two other documents that provide supplementary details of GIZ’s key evaluation instruments: project evaluations for BMZ business and corporate strategic evaluations. They are geared in particular to GIZ staff members who commission, implement or support evaluations and to evaluators who...
-
NGO-IDEAs (NGO – Impact on Development, Empowerment and Actions) NGO-IDEAs is a cooperation of about 40 non-govermental organisations (NGOs) from South Asia, East Africa and the Philippines and 14 German NGOs working in the field of development cooperation. It identifies and develops jointly with all partners, concepts and tools for NGOs in the areas of Outcome and Impact Assessment and Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E). NGO-IDEAs is further being supported by VENRO, the umbrella organisation of...
-
The purpose of this briefing note is to review opportunities for using complexity aware approaches to Theory of Change (ToC) to inform the SDC approach. It provides an overview of complexity-aware approaches and then focuses on demonstrating how complexity thinking can support programming by building on the frameworks currently being used in the project/programme cycle management (PCM) processes. It is aimed at SDC staff, in particular Programme Officers and staff of partner organisations...
-
The purpose of this briefing note is to add to SDC’s understanding of Theory of Change (ToC), drawing on the literature and practice to sketch out the current state of the art approach. This involves expanding on ToC beyond SDC’s current practice of using Impact Hypotheses (IH) to bridge it to operational practice and use ToC more explicitly in the project/programme cycle management (PCM) processes. Sharing the state of the art on use of ToC in the development sector, this briefing...
-
Effective learning is a key driver of market systems change, with the potential to enhance system competitiveness, resilience, and inclusiveness. Shifting the Locus of Learning: Catalyzing Private Sector Learning to Drive Systemic Change recently outlined a rationale for enhancing the scale and quality of learning in a system and identifying 10 strategies programs can contextualize to catalyze learning. These strategies are also backed with robust examples from 13 programs doing this work...
-
Check out this video to see what’s inside our new resource: Practitioners' Guidance to Assessing Systems Change, developed by MEL Managers for MEL Managers. (Check out the Guidance here https://bit.ly/MSPMELClinics.) Hear from the authors about which parts they love the most and how this guide challenges MEL managers to assess systems change as an ongoing aspect of implementation, generating feedback that teams need to better understand and catalyze change, for more impact.
-
Executive Summary When Christian Aid (CA) Ireland devised its multi-country and multi-year Irish Aid funded Programme Grant II (2017-2022), they opted to move away from a linear programme management approach and to explore an adaptive one. Across seven countries: Angola, Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Israel and the occupied Palestinian territory, Sierra Leone, and Zimbabwe, CA and partner organisations support marginalised communities to realise their rights, reduce violence and address...
-
Theory of Change is thought to be very useful for learning and adaptive management of complex interventions such as advocacy. Nevertheless, the use of Theory of Change is also under critique. One common criticism is that Theory of Change is often used as a framework that fixes agreements rather than as a living, guiding tool that helps reflection and adaptation. However, while such criticism stresses forms of control, little research has looked at the way Theory of Change and advocacy...
-
Over the last decades, the Logical Framework Approach (LFA) has become universally known and has assumed a key role for planning and managing development interventions. LFA, however, is not uncontroversial and the approach has been subject to criticism, concerning both its theoretical foundations and practical use. Despite these criticisms LFA’s position has not been fundamentally weakened and while many donors acknowledge its limits and weaknesses, they maintain (some would say impose) its...
-
ICAI published this review on DFID’s approach to value for money in February 2018, and as value for money is both a process and an outcome and cuts across all aspects of DFID’s operations, did not score this review. We made five recommendations and published a follow-up to this review in July 2019. All UK government departments are required to achieve value for money in their use of public funds. In recent years, DFID has been working to build value for money considerations further into its...
-
This thesis applies ideational and institutional theories to analyse how two specific ideas, results and adaptation, have changed the theory and practice of development cooperation. The thesis addresses the question of why the results and adaptation ideas are often treated as binaries and how this debate has evolved historically. In a first theoretical paper, the evolution of results and adaptation is conceptualised as a combination of institutional layering and diffusion within development...
-
This document offers practical guidance for assessing the Value for Money (VfM) of government- and donor-financed programmes and policy interventions. In line with OPM’s focus and mission, it has been predominantly applied in the international development sector, but the approach upon which it is based is also used in the context of domestic public policy and programmes.1 There is increasing scrutiny on VfM in international development, but a lack of appropriate methods to support its...
-
Over the last decade, the peace sector has been developing and adapting Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) systems and tools to fit their contexts and ways of working. This evolution may hold some insights for the aid community in how to go beyond more traditional, backwards-looking M&E to navigate today’s volatile, interest-based world of politics and aid.
-
Addressing 21st century development challenges requires investments in innovation, including the use of new approaches and technologies. Currently, many development organisations prioritise investments in isolated innovation pilots that leverage a specific approach or technology rather than pursuing a strategic approach to expand the organisation’s toolbox with innovations that have proven their comparative advantage over what is currently used. This Working Paper addresses this challenge of...
-
How can we measure and learn when promoting systems change? It’s a challenge that has inspired Laudes Foundation to develop a rubrics-based methodology to help us, our partners and the wider field of philanthropy, understand our contribution to change, while learning and adapting to new and unforeseen circumstances. Change cannot be captured by numbers alone because metrics put the focus on what can be counted, not always what’s most important. Rubrics are a framework that set a standard...
-
In September of 2014, USAID’s Office of Learning, Evaluation & Research (LER) awarded the Learning and Knowledge Management (LEARN) contract to Dexis Consulting Group and subcontractor RTI International.1 This document—the End of Contract Report—captures five and half years of results and reflections for our stakeholders. Our intention is to share the good and the bad, and while this report would not be considered a “tell all,” we think we have a story worth sharing, particularly to USAID...
-
Relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, and sustainability are widely used evaluation criteria, particularly in international development co-operation. They help to determine the merit or worth of various interventions, such as strategies, policies, programmes or projects. This guidance aims to help evaluators and others to better understand those criteria, and improve their use. It starts by describing what they are, and how they are meant to be used. Then the definitions...
Explore
Theme
-
Development Actors Perspectives
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- Canada - GAC & IDRC (1)
- China (2)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (12)
- G7 (1)
- GIZ (Germany) (7)
- Hivos - Netherlands (1)
- Irish Aid (2)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- NGO Perspectives (16)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (5)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (2)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (2)
- SDC - Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (2)
- SIDA - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (3)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (5)
- USAID (11)
- World Bank (2)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
- After Action Reviews (2)
- Beneficiary Assessment/Engagement (4)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Context Monitoring (1)
- Contribution Analysis (1)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (1)
- Ex-post Evaluation (1)
- Feedback Systems (2)
- Impact evaluation (4)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (2)
- Innovation System Analysis (1)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Logical Framework (3)
- MEL in International Development (10)
- Outcome Mapping (1)
- Participatory Action Research (1)
- Participatory Evaluation (2)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (2)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (3)
- Policy Scientific Approach (1)
- Portfolio Management (3)
- Positive Deviance (2)
- Process Tracing (1)
- Realist Evaluation (1)
- Rigour (2)
- Rubrics (2)
- Scenario Planning (1)
- Strategy testing (1)
- Systemic Change (10)
- Systems Mapping (2)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (4)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (1)
- Value for Money (2)
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(39)
- Adaptive Learning (6)
- Adaptive Management (20)
- Agile & Lean approaches (1)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (3)
- Doing Development Differently (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (8)
- Other Adaptive approaches (2)
- Results Based Management (4)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (9)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (1)
- Cases (13)
-
Geography
(14)
-
Africa
(9)
-
Central Africa
(1)
- Angola (1)
- Eastern Africa (7)
-
Northern Africa
(1)
- Egypt (1)
-
West Africa
(6)
- Benim (1)
- Niger (2)
- Nigeria (1)
- Senegal (1)
- Sierra Leone (1)
-
Central Africa
(1)
-
Americas
(4)
-
Central America
(3)
- Ecuador (2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (1)
- Mexico (2)
- South America (2)
-
Central America
(3)
-
Asia
(6)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
- China (1)
-
South-eastern Asia
(1)
- Indonesia (1)
-
Southern Asia
(2)
- Bangladesh (1)
- Nepal (1)
- Pakistan (1)
-
Western Asia
(2)
- Israel (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
-
Europe
(3)
-
Western Europe
(3)
- Germany (3)
-
Western Europe
(3)
-
Africa
(9)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (1)
-
Practical
(21)
- Tools (4)
-
Sectors [+]
(28)
- Agriculture (3)
- Alternative Development (1)
- Children (2)
- Economic development (6)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (3)
- Gender (2)
- Governance and Accountability (7)
- Health (1)
- Humanitarian Aid (2)
- Innovation (in Development) (2)
- NGOs (2)
- Organizational Change (2)
- Peace Building (1)
- Scaling up / Propagating (1)
- Social Accountability (1)
Resource type
- Blog Post (3)
- Book (2)
- Book Section (2)
- Journal Article (3)
- Magazine Article (1)
- Radio Broadcast (1)
- Report (50)
- Thesis (1)
- Video Recording (1)
- Web Page (1)