Your search
Results 109 resources
-
Policy influence and advocacy are increasingly regarded as a means of creating sustainable policy change in international development. It is often also seen as a difficult area to monitor and evaluate. Yet there is an increasingly rich strand of innovation in options to monitor, evaluate and learn from both the successes and failures of policy influence and advocacy interventions. This paper explores current trends in monitoring and evaluating policy influence and advocacy; discusses...
-
Using monitoring data to improve interventions is harder than it seems. Decision-makers are often busy implementing activities, unclear about their roles in data collection and analysis, and uncertain what data matters most or when. PRISMA, an AUD77 million agricultural Market Systems Development (MSD) programme funded by DFAT Australia, has encountered these challenges. With the programme completing its first five year phase, this case study shares ten key lessons divided into three...
-
For organizations committed to social change, advocacy often figures as a crucial strategic element. How to assess effectiveness in advocacy is, therefore, important. The usefulness of Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) in advocacy are subject to much current debate. Advocacy staff, MEL professionals, senior managers, the funding community, and stakeholders of all kinds are searching for ways to improve practices – and thus their odds of success – in complex and contested advocacy...
-
Governments and organizations invest huge sums of money in development interventions to explicitly address poverty and its root causes. However, a high proportion of these do not work. This is because interventions are grounded in flawed assumptions about how change happens -- change is rarely linear, yet development interventions are almost entirely based on linear planning models. Change is also characterized by unintended consequences, which are not predictable by planners and by power...
-
This chapter examines good practices in implementing effective Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) systems within complex international development Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance (DRG) programs, which are characterized by challenges of non-linearity, limited evidence of theories of change, and contextual and politically contingent nature of outcomes. The chapter presents three cases of MEL systems in complex projects implemented by Pact across distinct and diverse operating...
-
This training package includes 7 Training Modules and a set of Annexes (Annexes A-O). The Training Modules build on each other and should ideally be used in a sequenced way in a training setting. However, for groups with specific training needs around particular areas, modules can also be used individually, but need to be tailored by the trainers and facilitators to meet the needs of specific audiences. The annexes provide worksheets and hand-outs that can be used as resources during the training for specific modules and exercises.
-
Check out this video to see what’s inside our new resource: Practitioners' Guidance to Assessing Systems Change, developed by MEL Managers for MEL Managers. (Check out the Guidance here https://bit.ly/MSPMELClinics.) Hear from the authors about which parts they love the most and how this guide challenges MEL managers to assess systems change as an ongoing aspect of implementation, generating feedback that teams need to better understand and catalyze change, for more impact.
-
Introduction and rationale The concept of a value chain is increasingly being applied in the design and implementation of development programs aimed at poverty reduction. As an analytical tool, it provides a useful framework for understanding key activities, relationships, and mechanisms that allow producers, processors, buyers, sellers, and consumers—separated by time and space—to gradually add value to products and services as they pass from one link of the chain to another, making it a...
-
This paper identifies ways in which donors can be more effective in fragile and conflict-affected states by exploiting theories and concepts drawn from public management.
-
This paper tracks the efforts of an Asia Foundation team and local stakeholders as they worked to support improvements in the solid waste management sector in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. The team worked in a flexible way with a range of partners, and with particular focus on understanding the incentives and politics affecting service delivery. While reform of the sector remains in progress, steps have been taken to introduce more competition and better public sector management of solid waste...
-
This article explores the potential of using participatory action research as an adaptive programming modality to drive learning and innovation to tackle the drivers of (and seek to eliminate) the Worst Forms of Child Labour. We draw on our experience from early phases of implementation of a large-scale action research programme, which despite the constraints covid-19 posed in moving to full implementation and participatory engagement with children and other stakeholders on the ground, is...
-
- This short paper draws out lessons for working effectively with and through partners, based on the experience of the Institutions for Inclusive Development (I4ID) programme – an adaptive, politically smart governance programme in Tanzania. • Cultivating effective partnerships can be a key part of delivering locally legitimate projects that have the potential to create sustainable change. Adaptive and politically informed ways of working create specific opportunities and challenges for...
-
Achieving impact through research for development programmes (R4D) requires engagement with diverse stakeholders across the research, development and policy divides. Understanding how such programmes support the emergence of outcomes, therefore, requires a focus on the relational aspects of engagement and collaboration. Increasingly, evaluation of large research collaborations is employing social network analysis (SNA), making use of its relational view of causation. In this paper, we use...
-
Rigorous Impact Evaluation in GIZ Governance Programmes (How-To-Note)von Schiller, A. - 2020 - Bonn
Why should I integrate an impact assessment in my programme? How will the programme benefit from it? Are the benefits worth the effort and expenses? How do I design and implement it in detail? Who is addressable for support? What should I pay attention to in order to get the most out of it? This note is meant to answer these questions. It addresses leaders and project staff of governance programmes who are interested in using this tool within their specific governance programme or project....
-
When social accountability interventions scale up and their sustainability depends on the interactions of many agents and system components, related results are rarely observable at the end of an intervention. The 2019 OECD Development Assistance Committee’s (OECD DAC) revamped evaluations criteria for assessing sustainability acknowledges that such results are often emergent, and should be monitored and evaluated with this in mind. It therefore emphasizes a turn towards assessing complex...
Explore
Theme
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
- After Action Reviews (2)
- Capacity Development (2)
- Case Study (2)
- Comparisons/Benchmarking (1)
- Context Monitoring (1)
- Contribution Analysis (3)
- Cost-Benefit Analysis (3)
- Cost-effectiveness analysis (1)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Cross-sectional study (1)
- Data mining (1)
- Delphi Survey (1)
- Descriptive Statistics (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (3)
- Diaries (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (4)
- Ex-post Evaluation (2)
- Feedback Systems (1)
- Focus Group Discussions (3)
- Impact evaluation (5)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (1)
- Innovation System Analysis (1)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (4)
- Logical Framework (3)
- MEL in International Development (10)
- Most Significant Change (1)
- Network Analysis (2)
- Objectives and options analysis (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (1)
- Outcome Mapping (1)
- Participatory Action Research (9)
- Participatory Evaluation (3)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (2)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (2)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (1)
- Policy Scientific Approach (1)
- Political Economy Analysis (6)
- Portfolio Management (4)
- Power Analysis (1)
- Process Tracing (3)
- Public Management Theory (1)
- Qualitative data analysis and grounded theory (2)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (2)
- Realist Evaluation (3)
- Rigour (2)
- Rubrics (2)
- Scenario Planning (1)
- SenseMaker (1)
- Social Media Metrics (1)
- Stakeholder analysis (2)
- Stakeholder Feedback (1)
- Strategy testing (1)
- Surveys (4)
- Sustainability (2)
- SWOT Analysis (1)
- Systemic Change (12)
- Systems Mapping (7)
- Theory-based evaluations (3)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (11)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (1)
- Value for Money (4)
-
Sectors [+]
- Advocacy and Activism (1)
- Agriculture (3)
- Alternative Development (15)
- Cash Trasfers (2)
- Children (8)
- Citizen Engagement (5)
- Climate Change (2)
- Combatting violent extremism (4)
- Economic development (9)
- Education (3)
- Employment (1)
- Environmental Management (1)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (8)
- Gender (3)
- Governance and Accountability (17)
- Health (4)
- Humanitarian Aid (4)
- Innovation (in Development) (5)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (1)
- Knowledge to Practice (10)
- Locally driven development (2)
- NGOs (4)
- Organizational Change (4)
- Peace Building (3)
- Private Sector Development (1)
- Research for Development (R4D) (4)
- Rural development (2)
- Scaling up / Propagating (4)
- Social Accountability (4)
- Social Protection (1)
- Waste Management (1)
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(63)
- Adaptive Learning (14)
- Adaptive Management (29)
- Adaptive Rigour (1)
- Agile & Lean approaches (2)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (2)
- Design Thinking / HCD (2)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (8)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (1)
-
Other sectors
(1)
- Sport (1)
- Participation (1)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (1)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (5)
- Results Based Management (1)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (16)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (4)
- Cases (38)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(28)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- China (2)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (4)
- GIZ (Germany) (3)
- Hivos - Netherlands (1)
- Irish Aid (1)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- NGO Perspectives (6)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (1)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (1)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (2)
- SIDA - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (1)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (1)
- USAID (9)
- World Bank (1)
-
Geography
(30)
-
Africa
(15)
- Central Africa (2)
-
Eastern Africa
(12)
- Kenya (1)
- Malawi (1)
- Mozambique (4)
- Rwanda (2)
- Somalia (1)
- South Sudan (1)
- Tanzania (1)
- Uganda (2)
- Zimbabwe (3)
- Northern Africa (1)
-
West Africa
(7)
- Benim (1)
- Mali (1)
- Nigeria (3)
- Senegal (1)
- Sierra Leone (1)
-
Americas
(4)
-
Central America
(2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (1)
- South America (4)
-
Central America
(2)
-
Asia
(17)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
- China (1)
- South-eastern Asia (3)
-
Southern Asia
(11)
- Bangladesh (7)
- India (1)
- Nepal (5)
- Pakistan (3)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
-
Europe
(1)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
- Spain (1)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
-
Oceania
(1)
-
Melanesia
(1)
- Papua New Guinea (1)
-
Melanesia
(1)
-
Africa
(15)
-
Practical
(20)
- Tools (1)
Resource type
- Blog Post (8)
- Book (6)
- Book Section (3)
- Journal Article (17)
- Magazine Article (1)
- Report (72)
- Thesis (1)
- Video Recording (1)
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(4)
-
Between 1980 and 1989
(1)
- 1989 (1)
- Between 1990 and 1999 (3)
-
Between 1980 and 1989
(1)
- Between 2000 and 2024 (105)