Your search
Results 177 resources
-
The UNDP has been exploring new approaches to M&E to better understand and address complex systems challenges. Traditional linear project-based planning and evaluation methods are insufficient for dealing with the unpredictable nature of such systems. The UNDP’s new Strategic Plan calls for a shift in M&E practices to align with the complexity of today’s global challenges. Key points from the blog post include: Learning and Adapting: There’s a need for continuous learning and adaptation in...
-
The Covid-19 Responses for Equity (CORE) programme was a three-year initiative funded by the Canadian International Development Research Centre (IDRC) that brought together 20 projects from across the global South to understand the socioeconomic impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic, improve existing responses, and generate better policy options for recovery. The research covered 42 countries across Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East to understand the ways in which the pandemic...
-
AI already is being used in some areas of process improvement, and the usage of this technology — including generative AI — promises to grow. That’s because it can perform tasks faster and much less expensively than humans alone. But it will never fully replace people — and that poses management challenges.
-
Organising for Systems Innovation at Scale Our team at Griffith Centre for Systems Innovation have been experimenting with and evolving a Challenge-led Innovation Approach (based on Mission-oriented approaches developed by Mariana Mazzucato at UCL IIPP and others internationally). We are using this approach to guide the way we work internally and engage with our systems innovation partners. We’ve facilitated intensive Re:Treats, worked with government bodies, businesses and civic...
-
Over the last decade, the peace sector has been developing and adapting Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) systems and tools to fit their contexts and ways of working. This evolution may hold some insights for the aid community in how to go beyond more traditional, backwards-looking M&E to navigate today’s volatile, interest-based world of politics and aid.
-
This report addresses the well-recognized evidence gap1 on the longer-term impacts created by marketdriven programming; specifically, programming influenced by market systems development (MSD) principles. It does so by presenting the findings of an ex-post study conducted three and a half years after the close of USAID’s Feed the Future Senegal Naatal Mbay Activity (hereafter Naatal Mbay) in 2019. It examines the scale and sustainability of changes resulting from Naatal Mbay’s introduction...
-
For AC practitioners, systems mapping is essential but also difficult. To lessen obstacles, Peter Woodrow proposes a scaffolded approach. An Experiment in “Fast Forwarding” Drawing upon our near-decade work on corruption, we recently decided to try an experiment: we would present “common patterns” of corruption as tentative models to adapt and add to—rather than try to teach people to do systems mapping from scratch. In this teaching experiment, each common pattern would function as a kind...
-
Check out this video to see what’s inside our new resource: Practitioners' Guidance to Assessing Systems Change, developed by MEL Managers for MEL Managers. (Check out the Guidance here https://bit.ly/MSPMELClinics.) Hear from the authors about which parts they love the most and how this guide challenges MEL managers to assess systems change as an ongoing aspect of implementation, generating feedback that teams need to better understand and catalyze change, for more impact.
-
What problem is the KRT model trying to solve? For workforces that experience continuous staff turnover, the lack of systematic knowledge transfer can often lead to: - Loss of programmatic momentum, - Duplication of efforts and frustration, and - Wasted time and resources. The Knowledge Retention and Transfer (KRT) model provides tools, processes, and practices to individuals, teams, offices, and organizations to improve knowledge handover, which in turn improves efficiency and programmatic and operational learning.
-
The world changes too much for anyone who is invested in social change work to imagine that this work is linear and predictable. Opportunities come and go, whether caused by a pandemic or political shifts. This much most social movement leaders and activists intuitively understand. But what can be done with this realization? How might movement groups better prepare for moments of opportunity? We want to explore how we can create the changes we want to see by responding to the changes that are outside our control.
-
Addressing 21st century development challenges requires investments in innovation, including the use of new approaches and technologies. Currently, many development organisations prioritise investments in isolated innovation pilots that leverage a specific approach or technology rather than pursuing a strategic approach to expand the organisation’s toolbox with innovations that have proven their comparative advantage over what is currently used. This Working Paper addresses this challenge of...
-
Participatory action research (PAR) is an approach to research that prioritizes the value of experiential knowledge for tackling problems caused by unequal and harmful social systems, and for envisioning and implementing alternatives. PAR involves the participation and leadership of those people experiencing issues, who take action to produce emancipatory social change, through conducting systematic research to generate new knowledge. This Primer sets out key considerations for the design of...
-
How can donors and grantees work together to create effective monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) practices that drive field-wide transformation?
-
The complexity of issues addressed by research for development (R4D) requires collaborations between partners from a range of disciplines and cultural contexts. Power asymmetries within such partnerships may obstruct the fair distribution of resources, responsibilities and benefits across all partners. This paper presents a cross-case analysis of five R4D partnership evaluations, their methods and how they unearthed and addressed power asymmetries. It contributes to the field of R4D...
-
Nearly all challenges in international development tend to be complex because they depend on constantly evolving human behaviour, systems, and contexts, involving multiple actors, entities, and processes. As a result, both the discovery and scaling of innovations to address challenges in development often involve changes in system behaviour or even system-level transformation. This is rarely a linear process over time and can result in unexpected outcomes. Existing evaluation techniques...
-
In this blog we are sharing a digest of some of the many useful and innovative monitoring, evaluation and learning resources and efforts that have come through the M&E Sandbox in 2022. A lot of these resources have been shared by our community in response to the overwhelmingly positive feedback from the launch of the Sandbox (please keep them coming!). We hope you find it useful. We have grouped these efforts and resources under six broad questions: - How do we measure systems...
-
In the decades since the Army created the After Action Review (AAR), businesses have embraced the practice as a way of learning from both failure and success. But all too often the practice gets reduced to nothing more than a pro forma exercise. The authors of this article describe the history and philosophy of the original AAR, debunk three myths about the practice that impede its proper use, and finally suggest three improvements that can help business leaders make the most of it.
-
On December 13, 2022, Social Impact hosted a webinar in our Evidence for Impact series, "Strengthen Your Team's CLA Practices: Introducing the CLA Maturity Tool for USAID Implementers." Through the session, we shared more about the origin and history of the USAID tool upon which this version is based, why and how we updated
Explore
Theme
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
- Adaptive Learning (29)
- Adaptive Management (64)
- Adaptive Rigour (4)
- Agile & Lean approaches (4)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (12)
- Design Thinking / HCD (2)
- Doing Development Differently (2)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (10)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (1)
- Other Adaptive approaches (3)
- Other sectors (7)
- Participation (6)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (2)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (9)
- Positive Deviance & 2 loops model (1)
- Results Based Management (4)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (55)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (11)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (2)
- After Action Reviews (6)
- Artificial Intelligence (1)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Context Monitoring (1)
- Contribution Analysis (2)
- Cost-Benefit Analysis (1)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Delphi Survey (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (1)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (4)
- Ex-post Evaluation (1)
- Focus Group Discussions (1)
- Impact evaluation (5)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (2)
- Indicator-based approaches (1)
- Innovation System Analysis (2)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (6)
- Logical Framework (2)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (4)
- MEL Bricolage (1)
- MEL in International Development (18)
- Most Significant Change (2)
- Narrative Based Approaches (2)
- Network Analysis (2)
- Outcome Harvesting (3)
- Outcome Mapping (4)
- Participatory Action Research (10)
- Participatory Evaluation (2)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (3)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (4)
- Political Economy Analysis (9)
- Portfolio Management (10)
- Positive Deviance (1)
- Power Analysis (1)
- Process Tracing (3)
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (2)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (2)
- Realist Evaluation (3)
- Rigour (1)
- Rubrics (6)
- Scenario Planning (3)
- SenseMaker (3)
- Stakeholder Feedback (1)
- Strategy testing (2)
- Surveys (1)
- SWOT Analysis (1)
- Systemic Change (32)
- Systems Mapping (7)
- Theory-based evaluations (5)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (12)
- Trans-disciplinary Research (1)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (3)
- Value for Money (5)
- Cases (26)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(39)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- China (2)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (8)
- GIZ (Germany) (1)
- Irish Aid (1)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- NGO Perspectives (9)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (4)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (1)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (1)
- SIDA - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (2)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (3)
- USAID (11)
- World Bank (1)
-
Geography
(27)
-
Africa
(17)
-
Central Africa
(1)
- Angola (1)
-
Eastern Africa
(13)
- Kenya (1)
- Malawi (1)
- Mozambique (4)
- Rwanda (2)
- Somalia (1)
- South Sudan (1)
- Tanzania (1)
- Uganda (3)
- Zambia (1)
- Zimbabwe (3)
- Northern Africa (1)
-
Southern Africa
(2)
- South Africa (2)
-
West Africa
(8)
- Mali (1)
- Nigeria (5)
- Senegal (1)
- Sierra Leone (1)
-
Central Africa
(1)
-
Americas
(3)
-
Central America
(2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (1)
- South America (3)
-
Central America
(2)
-
Asia
(13)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
- China (1)
- South-eastern Asia (3)
-
Southern Asia
(6)
- Bangladesh (3)
- India (1)
- Nepal (3)
- Pakistan (2)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
-
Oceania
(1)
-
Melanesia
(1)
- Papua New Guinea (1)
-
Melanesia
(1)
-
Africa
(17)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (1)
-
Practical
(38)
- Tools (1)
-
Sectors [+]
(63)
- Agriculture (3)
- Alternative Development (10)
- Cash Trasfers (1)
- Children (3)
- Citizen Engagement (3)
- Climate Change (2)
- Combatting violent extremism (1)
- Economic development (9)
- Education (3)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (5)
- Gender (2)
- Governance and Accountability (8)
- Health (3)
- Humanitarian Aid (1)
- Innovation (in Development) (4)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (1)
- Knowledge to Practice (2)
- Locally driven development (2)
- NGOs (2)
- Organizational Change (4)
- Peace Building (3)
- Research for Development (R4D) (1)
- Rural development (2)
- Scaling up / Propagating (4)
- Social Accountability (2)
- Waste Management (1)
Resource type
- Blog Post (15)
- Book (12)
- Book Section (3)
- Forum Post (1)
- Journal Article (24)
- Magazine Article (4)
- Radio Broadcast (1)
- Report (110)
- Software (1)
- Thesis (1)
- Video Recording (3)
- Web Page (2)
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(5)
-
Between 1980 and 1989
(1)
- 1989 (1)
- Between 1990 and 1999 (4)
-
Between 1980 and 1989
(1)
- Between 2000 and 2024 (172)