Your search
Results 65 resources
-
Pressure is mounting on international development cooperation agencies to prove the impact of their work. Private and public commissioners as well as the general public are increasingly asking for robust evidence of impact. In this context, rigorous impact evaluation (RIE) methods are increasingly receiving attention within the broader German development system and in GIZ. Compared to other implementing agencies such as DFID or USAid, the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale...
-
Rigorous Impact Evaluation in GIZ Governance Programmes (How-To-Note)von Schiller, A. - 2020 - Bonn
Why should I integrate an impact assessment in my programme? How will the programme benefit from it? Are the benefits worth the effort and expenses? How do I design and implement it in detail? Who is addressable for support? What should I pay attention to in order to get the most out of it? This note is meant to answer these questions. It addresses leaders and project staff of governance programmes who are interested in using this tool within their specific governance programme or project....
-
This briefing note looks at how the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Wildlife Asia programme has operationalised the concepts of adaptive rigour and adaptive management as part of its approach to collaborating, learning and adapting. As described by the Global Learning for Adaptive Management (GLAM) initiative, adaptive rigour is about ensuring that the data, information, methods, processes and systems that underpin adaptive management are robust, systematic and...
-
This briefing note focuses on the remote collection and use of data for adaptive management during the Covid-19 pandemic, setting out key considerations to help practitioners think through a transition from more ‘traditional’ monitoring, evaluation and learning (MEL) to MEL for adaptive management (MEL4AM) that reflects the unique data collection challenges presented by Covid-19. The brief provides an overview of some key considerations in remote data collection, when this is required, and...
-
Considerations for planning a post project evaluation during the project, at the end, or after it has closed.
Explore
Theme
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (2)
- After Action Reviews (1)
- Beneficiary Assessment/Engagement (1)
- Causal Mechanisms (10)
- Contribution Analysis (4)
- Diaries (1)
- Evaluability assessment (1)
- Ex-post Evaluation (2)
- Feedback Systems (1)
- Humour (1)
- Impact evaluation (3)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (1)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowledge Management (1)
- Logical Framework (1)
- MEL in International Development (4)
- Network Analysis (1)
- Outcome Mapping (1)
- Participatory Action Research (1)
- Participatory Evaluation (2)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (3)
- Post Project Evaluations (1)
- Process Tracing (5)
- Realist Evaluation (1)
- Remote Monitoring (1)
- Rigour (2)
- Rubrics (2)
- Rules of Thumb (1)
- Scenario Planning (1)
- Sustainability (3)
- Systemic Change (2)
- Tech 4 MEL (4)
- Theory-based evaluations (3)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (10)
- Value for Money (1)
- Adaptive Approaches [+] (14)
- Cases (4)
- Courses (1)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(7)
- China (1)
- Develpment Industry - Private Companies and ThinkTanks (1)
- GIZ (Germany) (2)
- Hivos - Netherlands (1)
- NGO Perspectives (1)
- USAID (1)
- World Bank (1)
-
Geography
(7)
-
Africa
(3)
-
Eastern Africa
(3)
- Malawi (1)
- Mozambique (1)
- Rwanda (1)
- Tanzania (1)
-
West Africa
(1)
- Benim (1)
-
Eastern Africa
(3)
-
Americas
(1)
-
South America
(1)
- Peru (1)
-
South America
(1)
-
Asia
(3)
-
Southern Asia
(2)
- Bangladesh (1)
- Nepal (1)
- Pakistan (1)
-
Southern Asia
(2)
-
Europe
(1)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
- Spain (1)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
- Oceania (1)
-
Africa
(3)
-
Practical
(12)
- Tools (3)
- Sectors [+] (16)
Resource type
- Blog Post (10)
- Book (1)
- Journal Article (16)
- Manuscript (1)
- Report (30)
- Thesis (1)
- Video Recording (2)
- Web Page (4)