Your search
Results 319 resources
-
INTERNATIONAL FUTURES HELP SYSTEM Introduction to IFs Purposes Visual Representation of IFs Issues and Modules Quick Survey of IFs Issues and Modules IFs Background IFs Geographic Representation of the World IFs Time Horizon Instructional Use Acknowledgements Feedback Support for IFs Use Development Mode Features
-
I am a public policy consultant from Auckland, New Zealand. My practice specializes in evaluation and economic analysis. In this booklet I set out a model for evaluating value for investment (VFI) in social programs. The model defines VFI as an evaluative question about an economic problem. It uses explicit evaluative reasoning to provide a clear answer to the VFI question. Methods are matched to context, to provide the specific mix of evidence (economic and/or other) needed to support a...
-
Realist evaluation provides valuable insights into how and why programmes lead to change, and can generate transferable lessons to help practitioners roll out or scale up an intervention. However, as ...
-
This article sets out the components of the foresight approach that has been adopted by many governments in the developed world, and identifies elements of this 'dominant' approach that may hinder its uptake in developing countries. Instead, it suggests that a less rigid, more exploratory and normative approach may be better suited to many developing country contexts. With reference to the writings and practice of the creator of 'la prospective', Gaston Berger, it argues for an attitude that...
-
Doing things differently: Rethinking monitoring and evaluation to understand change Learning paper Over the past four years, Saferworld has put in place a way of monitoring, evaluating and learning from our work focused on behaviour and relationship change. This paper outlines the process we have gone through to adapt, embed, and embrace an approach inspired by Outcome Mapping and Outcome Harvesting (OH). Key benefits of our monitoring, evaluation and learning approach are: It is simple,...
-
Demonstrating results has been a concern in international development cooperation ever since it was started and in recent years there has been an increased focus on achieving and reporting on “results”. Despite the fact that everyone involved in development cooperation wants to make a difference there has been a growing criticism from practitioners about the “results agenda” based on a concern that the approaches used are not fit for purpose. In the EBA-report, Cathy Shutt, at the...
-
The online self assessment tool was created by the SROI Network in collaboration with Hall Aitken to help users judge how well their evaluation practices adhere to principles of best practice. The tool is comprised of a seven stage questionnaire, showing results as a spider chart illustrating areas of strength and areas for improvement. The questionnaire itself is structured around the seven principles of SROI. These principles include ‘involve stakeholders’, ‘be transparent’ and ‘do not...
-
Summary There is growing recognition within the international development sector that there is a need for a new, more effective approach to engaging in public sector reform. This article builds on an emerging body of work that advocates more entrepreneurial and adaptive public sector reform programming. Drawing on knowledge and theory from public sector management, psychology and entrepreneurialism, this article aims to understand what motivates public sector workers to work...
-
Multi-project programmes can serve different purposes. For instance, they may coordinate multiple implementing entities; standardise management and technical support; compare intervention approaches across different contexts; enhance leverage through joint action; or foster sustainability by building relationships among organisations. • At the same time, multi-project programmes are costly, potentially duplicate other mechanisms that fulfil similar functions, and can dilute focus and create...
-
• There is considerable interest in the concept of adaptive development and what it may look like in different sectors, including health. • Adaptive types of programming from the health sector are relatively advanced; as we work towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), experiences in health can provide useful lessons for other areas of development. • The international health community may not use the label ‘adaptive development’, but many are already conducting adaptive work....
-
Recently thousands of evaluators came together in Chicago to celebrate the growing field, share exemplary practices, and to push our collective thinking on how evaluation responds to the complexity of social change efforts.
-
This tool describes the five key phases of evaluation, from planning and design, to implementation and communication of results. It provides a list of the main tasks and deliverables for each phase, intended for use by anyone managing an impact evaluation. This tool was developed by Irene Guijt, Simon Hearn, Tiina Pasanen and Patricia Rogers for use in Methods Lab projects. It follows to some extent the BetterEvaluation Rainbow Framework.
-
Time and budget constraints can mean that programmes are not able to assess all possible evaluation questions; this is especially true for multi-component or multi-site programmes operating in challenging environments. This tool identifies areas of enquiry to help programmes prioritise the number of questions and measurement indicators used. This tool was developed by Anne Buffardi for use in in Methods Lab projects.
-
Many development programme staff will commission an impact evaluation towards the end of a project or programme, only to find that the monitoring system did not provide adequate data about implementation, context, baselines or interim results. This tool provides a template outline for a report making recommendations on how to integrate a focus on impact into a programme’s existing monitoring and evaluation system, as the programme moves into a new phase. This template was developed by...
-
An evaluability assessment aims to assess the extent to which, and how best, a project can be evaluated in a reliable and credible fashion. These templates are intended to help anyone conducting an evaluability assessment to structure the final report. This tool was developed by Anne Buffardi and Bronwen McDonald for use in Methods Lab projects. It accompanies The Methods Lab publication ‘Evaluability assessment for impact evaluation: guidance, checklists and decision support’.
-
An evaluability assessment aims to assess the extent to which, and how best, an intervention can be evaluated in a reliable and credible fashion. These sample agendas are intended for people convening key stakeholders (such as project implementation staff and managers, donors and government officials) to discuss the purpose and scope of an impact evaluation and to identify key evaluation questions. This tool was developed by Bronwen McDonald, Anne Buffardi and Irene Guijt for use in Methods...
Explore
Theme
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (3)
- After Action Reviews (1)
- Appreciative Inquiry (4)
- Beneficiary Assessment/Engagement (2)
- Case Study (4)
- Causal Mechanisms (3)
- Circular charts applications (radar, pie, sunburst, spiderweb, orbic, etc) (2)
- Comparisons/Benchmarking (1)
- Contribution Analysis (2)
- Cost-Benefit Analysis (2)
- Cost-effectiveness analysis (1)
- Critical Systems Heuristics (3)
- Cross-sectional study (1)
- Data mining (1)
- Delphi Survey (1)
- Democratic Evaluation (1)
- Descriptive Statistics (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (2)
- Developmental Evaluation (11)
- Empowerment Evaluation (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (3)
- Evaluability assessment (5)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (5)
- Ex-post Evaluation (1)
- Feedback Systems (1)
- Focus Group Discussions (3)
- Impact evaluation (10)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (3)
- Indicator-based approaches (8)
- Innovation History (1)
- Innovation System Analysis (4)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowledge Management (7)
- Logical Framework (9)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (8)
- MEL in International Development (7)
- Most Significant Change (2)
- Narrative Based Approaches (1)
- Network Analysis (2)
- Objectives and options analysis (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (10)
- Outcome Mapping (16)
- Participatory Action Research (7)
- Participatory Evaluation (9)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (4)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (2)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (2)
- Policy Scientific Approach (2)
- Political Economy Analysis (11)
- Political Settlements Analysis (1)
- Portfolio Management (9)
- Positive Deviance (3)
- Power Analysis (1)
- Principles-Focused Evaluation (1)
- Process Tracing (2)
- Public Management Theory (2)
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (7)
- Qualitative data analysis and grounded theory (2)
- Qualitative Impact Assessment Protocol (2)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (5)
- Realist Evaluation (5)
- Rigour (2)
- Rubrics (2)
- Rules of Thumb (1)
- Scenario Planning (5)
-
Sense-making
(9)
- SenseMaker (6)
- Social Media Metrics (1)
- Social Return on Investment (4)
- Stakeholder analysis (2)
- Stakeholder Feedback (3)
- Strategy testing (1)
- Success Case Method (3)
- Surveys (3)
- SWOT Analysis (1)
- Systemic Change (6)
- Systems Mapping (3)
- Theory-based evaluations (6)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (44)
- Trans-disciplinary Research (1)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (6)
- Value for Investment (3)
- Value for Money (5)
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(83)
- Adaptive Learning (14)
- Adaptive Management (35)
- Adaptive Rigour (2)
- Agile & Lean approaches (3)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (6)
- Doing Development Differently (2)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (4)
- Other Adaptive approaches (3)
-
Other sectors
(4)
- Software Development (3)
- Sport (1)
- Participation (1)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (1)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (5)
- Positive Deviance & 2 loops models (1)
- Results Based Management (2)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (23)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (6)
- Cases (23)
- Courses (1)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(25)
- Canada - GAC & IDRC (1)
- China (1)
- DCED - Donor Committee for Enterprise Development (1)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (5)
- G7 (1)
- GIZ (Germany) (2)
- Irish Aid (1)
- NGO Perspectives (8)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (2)
- SDC - Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (2)
- SIDA - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (2)
- World Bank (1)
-
Geography
(14)
-
Africa
(7)
- Central Africa (1)
-
Eastern Africa
(2)
- Mozambique (1)
- Uganda (1)
-
Southern Africa
(1)
- South Africa (1)
- West Africa (3)
- Americas (1)
-
Asia
(4)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
- China (1)
- South-eastern Asia (2)
-
Southern Asia
(1)
- Bangladesh (1)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
-
Europe
(2)
-
Western Europe
(2)
- Germany (2)
-
Western Europe
(2)
-
Africa
(7)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (5)
-
Practical
(26)
- Tools (5)
-
Sectors [+]
(47)
- Advocacy and Activism (3)
- Alternative Development (6)
- Behavioural Change (1)
- Citizen Engagement (3)
- Combatting violent extremism (4)
- Economic development (3)
- Education (1)
- Environmental Management (1)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (6)
- Gender (1)
- Governance and Accountability (4)
- Health (3)
- Humanitarian Aid (2)
- Innovation (in Development) (2)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (1)
- Knowledge to Practice (7)
- Locally driven development (2)
- NGOs (3)
- Organizational Change (1)
- Peace Building (1)
- Scaling up / Propagating (1)
- Social Accountability (4)
- Waste Management (1)
Resource type
- Audio Recording (1)
- Blog Post (42)
- Book (24)
- Book Section (8)
- Conference Paper (1)
- Dataset (1)
- Document (11)
- Forum Post (1)
- Journal Article (48)
- Newspaper Article (1)
- Presentation (5)
- Report (156)
- Software (1)
- Thesis (1)
- Video Recording (5)
- Web Page (13)