Your search
Results 112 resources
-
This blog by Jonathan Kuhn-Patrick (UK Evaluation Society Trustee and AI Working Group Lead) explores the five emotional stages many evaluators experience as they begin working with AI.
-
Quality assurance strategies when working on unfamiliar topics
-
The post outlines the background and development of a new approach to assessing value for money (VfM) in public policies and social programs. King identifies a key problem: while there's increasing pressure to demonstrate VfM in public programs, traditional assessment methods are incomplete, with economics and evaluation operating as separate rather than integrated disciplines. Key points about the research development: 1. King developed a conceptual model for VfM evaluation, published in...
-
This article provides a comprehensive overview of rubric development in evaluation practice, focusing on stakeholder engagement and practical implementation. King explains that rubrics are essential tools for implementing evaluative reasoning, serving as frameworks that combine evidence, criteria, and standards to make transparent value judgments. The piece emphasizes that effective rubric development is inherently participatory, requiring meaningful stakeholder engagement for both ethical...
-
Building on interviews with colleagues in development organizations, donor & partner governments and foundations, this article explores the adoption of system and portfolio-based approaches in the development sector focusing on organizational motivations and challenges, changes in the network of the development sector actors, and types of collaborative experiments initiated around the novel approach. The aim is to take steps towards understanding how this type of approach for system change...
-
As the trust-based philanthropy wave is washing over the sector once again, concerns over its ability to prove impact, facilitate learning, and evaluate previous approaches are bubbling up. As a philanthropy professional with over …
-
Florencia Guerzovich and Alix Wadeson
-
The UNDP has been exploring new approaches to M&E to better understand and address complex systems challenges. Traditional linear project-based planning and evaluation methods are insufficient for dealing with the unpredictable nature of such systems. The UNDP’s new Strategic Plan calls for a shift in M&E practices to align with the complexity of today’s global challenges. Key points from the blog post include: Learning and Adapting: There’s a need for continuous learning and adaptation in...
-
Florencia Guerzovich
-
You may, or may not, be surprised to hear that many theories of change lack what we might generally understand as a theory.
-
Over the last decade, the peace sector has been developing and adapting Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) systems and tools to fit their contexts and ways of working. This evolution may hold some insights for the aid community in how to go beyond more traditional, backwards-looking M&E to navigate today’s volatile, interest-based world of politics and aid.
-
The CLARISSA Social Protection Intervention was set us as an innovative social policy intervention for tackling social ills, with a...
-
Principles and processes
-
This is a series about Monitoring, Evaluating and Learning (MEL) whether sets of interventions/portfolios are adding more together than each one would produce on their own. In post 1, I pointed to coherence, the new OECD-DAC evaluation criteria as a way to bridge the ambition of bringing bigger change with the MEL world. In post 2, I shared 3 of 4 practical lessons I’ve learned in experimenting with MEL systems and exercises that focus explicitly on interactions of...
-
This is a series about Monitoring, Evaluating and Learning (MEL) whether sets of interventions/portfolios are adding more together than each one would produce on their own. In post 1, I pointed to coherence, the new OECD-DAC evaluation criteria as a way to bridge the ambition of bringing bigger change with the MEL world. In post 2, I shared 3 of 4 practical lessons I’ve learned in experimenting with MEL systems and exercises that focus explicitly on interactions of...
-
This is a series about Monitoring, Evaluating and Learning (MEL) whether sets of interventions/portfolios are adding more together than each one would produce on their own. In post 1, I pointed to coherence, the new OECD-DAC evaluation criteria as a way to bridge the ambition of bringing bigger change with the MEL world. In post 2, I shared 3 of 4 practical lessons I’ve learned in experimenting with MEL systems and exercises that focus explicitly on interactions of...
-
Generic, analytic, holistic, orbic, asterisc, escalieric, cephalopodic
-
Social change takes time, and it is never a linear process. It also happens within an ecosystem, and rarely comes down to a single grantee partner or foundation. If we […]
-
For AC practitioners, systems mapping is essential but also difficult. To lessen obstacles, Peter Woodrow proposes a scaffolded approach. An Experiment in “Fast Forwarding” Drawing upon our near-decade work on corruption, we recently decided to try an experiment: we would present “common patterns” of corruption as tentative models to adapt and add to—rather than try to teach people to do systems mapping from scratch. In this teaching experiment, each common pattern would function as a kind...
Explore
Theme
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
- After Action Reviews (1)
- AI support (2)
- Appreciative Inquiry (2)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Causal Mechanisms (2)
- Circular charts applications (radar, pie, sunburst, spiderweb, orbic, etc) (1)
- Contribution Analysis (2)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Critical Systems Heuristics (3)
- Democratic Evaluation (1)
- Developmental Evaluation (2)
- Emergent Learning (1)
- Empowerment Evaluation (2)
- Ex-post Evaluation (1)
- Feedback Systems (1)
- Horizontal Evaluation (1)
- Impact evaluation (1)
- Innovation History (1)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowledge Management (2)
- Logical Framework (1)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (3)
- MEL Bricolage (1)
- MEL in International Development (5)
- Most Significant Change (1)
- Network Analysis (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (1)
- Outcome Mapping (4)
- Participatory Action Research (1)
- Participatory Evaluation (3)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (2)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (1)
- Portfolio Management (4)
- Positive Deviance (2)
- Process Tracing (1)
- Qualitative Impact Assessment Protocol (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (1)
- Realist Evaluation (1)
- Rigour (2)
- Rubrics (7)
- Rules of Thumb (2)
-
Sense-making
(4)
- SenseMaker (2)
- Social Return on Investment (2)
- Success Case Method (3)
- Sustainability (1)
- Systemic Change (6)
- Systems Mapping (3)
- Theory-based evaluations (1)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (10)
- Trust-based evaluation (/philanthropy /learning) (2)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (1)
- Value for Investment (3)
- Adaptive Approaches [+] (15)
- Cases (1)
- Development Actors Perspectives (3)
-
Geography
(2)
-
Africa
(1)
-
Eastern Africa
(1)
- South Sudan (1)
-
West Africa
(1)
- Mali (1)
-
Eastern Africa
(1)
-
Americas
(1)
-
South America
(1)
- Colombia (1)
-
South America
(1)
-
Asia
(1)
-
Southern Asia
(1)
- Bangladesh (1)
-
Southern Asia
(1)
-
Africa
(1)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (1)
-
Practical
(3)
- Tools (1)
- Sectors [+] (9)