Full Library
Evaluating with the Success Case Method
Resource type
Author/contributor
- Gram, Tom (Author)
Title
Evaluating with the Success Case Method
Abstract
The method was developed by Robert Brinkerhoff as an alternative (or supplement) to the Kirkpatrick approach and its derivatives. It is very simple and fast (which is part of it’s appeal) and goes something like this:
Step 1. Identify targeted business goals and impact expectations
Step 2. Survey a large representative sample of all participants in a program to identify high impact and low impact cases
Step 3. Analyze the survey data to identify:
a small group of successful participants
a small group unsuccessful participants
Step 4. Conduct in-depth interviews with the two selected groups to:
document the nature and business value of their application of learning
identify the performance factors that supported learning application and obstacles that prevented it.
Step 5. Document and disseminate the story
report impact
applaud successes
use data to educate managers and organization
The process produces two key outputs
In-depth stories of documented business effect that can be disseminated to a variety of audiences
Knowledge of factors that enhance or impede the effect of training on business results. Factors that are associated with successful application of new skills are compared and contrasted with those that impede training.
It answers practical and common questions we have about training and other initiatives:
What is really happening? Who’s using what, and how well? Who’s not using things as planned? What’s getting used, and what isn’t? Which people and how many are having success? Which people and how many are not?
What results are being achieved? What value, if any, is being realized? What goals are being met? What goals are not? Is the intervention delivering the promised and hoped for results? What unintended results are happening?
What is the value of the results? What sort of dollar or other value can be placed on the results? Does the program appear to be worthwhile? Is it producing results worth more than its costs? What is its return on investment? How much more value could it produce if it were working better?
How can it be improved? What’s helping? What’s getting in the way? What could be done to get more people to use it? How can everyone be more like those few who are most successful?
Blog Title
Performance X Design
Date
February 24 2011
Accessed
2018-10-22
Citation
Gram, T. (2011, February 24). Evaluating with the Success Case Method. Performance X Design. https://performancexdesign.wordpress.com/2011/02/24/evaluating-with-the-success-case-method/
Link to this record