Your search
Results 26 resources
-
This Research and Evidence Paper presents the theory-based and participatory evaluation design of the Child Labour: Action-Research- Innovation in South and South-Eastern Asia (CLARISSA) programme. The evaluation is embedded in emergent Participatory Action Research with children and other stakeholders to address the drivers of the worst forms of child labour (WFCL). The report describes the use of contribution analysis as an overarching approach, with its emphasis on crafting, nesting and...
-
Inclusive and rigorous peacebuilding evaluation is both vital and complex. In this blog we share examples of how we are innovating our methodologies to move towards participatory and adaptive practice.
-
Achieving impact through research for development programmes (R4D) requires engagement with diverse stakeholders across the research, development and policy divides. Understanding how such programmes support the emergence of outcomes, therefore, requires a focus on the relational aspects of engagement and collaboration. Increasingly, evaluation of large research collaborations is employing social network analysis (SNA), making use of its relational view of causation. In this paper, we use...
-
Programmes that aim to tackle complex societal issues, such as the worst forms of child labour, require rich partnerships that bring together different perspectives. CLARISSA’s consortium partnership adopts an empowerment approach to the interventions we deliver and our ways of working together. Part of this approach involves ongoing reflection and learning about how we work together in our partnership, and how this can be adapted if needed. This learning note focuses on a method used in...
-
Child Labour: Action-Research-Innovation in South and South-Eastern Asia (CLARISSA) is an evidence and innovation-generation programme funded by the United Kingdom’s Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), responding to the challenge of the worst forms of child labour (WFCL) in Bangladesh and Nepal. It is a challenge characterised by a poor understanding of its drivers and a lack of evidence on what works to combat it. To handle such fundamental uncertainty, the programme adopts a...
-
The complexity of issues addressed by research for development (R4D) requires collaborations between partners from a range of disciplines and cultural contexts. Power asymmetries within such partnerships may obstruct the fair distribution of resources, responsibilities and benefits across all partners. This paper presents a cross-case analysis of five R4D partnership evaluations, their methods and how they unearthed and addressed power asymmetries. It contributes to the field of R4D...
Explore
Theme
- Adaptive Approaches [+] (7)
- Cases (8)
- Development Actors Perspectives (5)
-
Geography
(8)
-
Africa
(1)
-
Eastern Africa
(1)
- South Sudan (1)
-
West Africa
(1)
- Mali (1)
-
Eastern Africa
(1)
-
Americas
(1)
-
South America
(1)
- Colombia (1)
-
South America
(1)
-
Asia
(7)
-
Southern Asia
(7)
- Bangladesh (6)
- Nepal (7)
-
Southern Asia
(7)
-
Africa
(1)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(20)
- After Action Reviews (3)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Contribution Analysis (4)
- Knowledge Management (1)
- MEL Bricolage (1)
- MEL in International Development (2)
- Network Analysis (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (1)
- Participatory Action Research (6)
- Participatory Evaluation (1)
- Power Analysis (1)
- Rigour (1)
- Rubrics (2)
- Systemic Change (1)
- Systems Mapping (1)
- Theory-based evaluations (1)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (4)
-
Sectors [+]
(12)
- Children (7)
- Citizen Engagement (1)
- Peace Building (1)
- Research for Development (R4D) (3)
- Scaling up / Propagating (1)
Resource type
- Blog Post (6)
- Journal Article (5)
- Presentation (1)
- Report (14)