Beyond Logframe: Critique, Variations and Alternatives
Resource type
Authors/contributors
- Hummelbrunner, Richard (Author)
- Fujita, Nobuko (Editor)
Title
Beyond Logframe: Critique, Variations and Alternatives
Abstract
Over the last decades, the Logical Framework Approach (LFA) has become
universally known and has assumed a key role for planning and managing
development interventions. LFA, however, is not uncontroversial and the
approach has been subject to criticism, concerning both its theoretical foundations
and practical use. Despite these criticisms LFA’s position has not
been fundamentally weakened and while many donors acknowledge its limits
and weaknesses, they maintain (some would say impose) its use as a planning
and monitoring tool.
This chapter reviews some of the experience gained with LFA and outlines
major attempts to develop variations – or move beyond it altogether.
The first section briefly describes the LFA concept and summarizes the main
points of critique. Section 2 then explores some variations which have been
developed in response to this critique and to improve LFA as a management
tool. Section 3 proposes a systemic alternative to logframe and Section 4 outlines
alternatives to LFA which have recently been introduced in German
development aid.
Book Title
Beyond Logframe; Using Systems Concepts in Evaluation
Place
Tokyo
Publisher
Foundation for Advanced Studies on International Development.
Date
2010
Pages
1-33
Accessed
2022-01-28
Citation
Hummelbrunner, R. (2010). Beyond Logframe: Critique, Variations and Alternatives. In N. Fujita (Ed.), Beyond Logframe; Using Systems Concepts in Evaluation (pp. 1–33). Foundation for Advanced Studies on International Development. http://www.perfeval.pol.ulaval.ca/sites/perfeval.pol.ulaval.ca/files/publication_129.pdf#page=8
Link to this record