Your search
Results 99 resources
-
Many readers recognise and understand that complex is about as simple as it gets for major policy and management. This guide is for those unwilling in the Anthropocene to shrink back into the older platitudes about ‘keep it simple’ and ‘not to worry, we’ll scale up the analysis later on’. This guide offers key concepts, methods, counternarratives, and analogies that recast major policy and management issues in ways that do not deny their complexity but help render them more tractable for action.
-
The world changes too much for anyone who is invested in social change work to imagine that this work is linear and predictable. Opportunities come and go, whether caused by a pandemic or political shifts. This much most social movement leaders and activists intuitively understand. But what can be done with this realization? How might movement groups better prepare for moments of opportunity? We want to explore how we can create the changes we want to see by responding to the changes that are outside our control.
-
The idea that technologies can change moral beliefs and practices is an old one. But how, exactly, does this happen? This paper builds on an emerging field of inquiry by developing a synoptic taxonomy of the mechanisms of techno-moral change. It argues that technology affects moral beliefs and practices in three main domains: decisional (how we make morally loaded decisions), relational (how we relate to others) and perceptual (how we perceive situations). It argues that across these three...
-
Social protection, and cash transfers especially, have been found to have many positive impacts on families’ lives and are now widely recognised as a cornerstone of any prosperous, fair society. The CLARISSA Cash Plus intervention is an innovative social protection scheme for tackling social ills, including the worst forms of child labour (WFCL). Combining community mobilisation, case work and cash transfers, it aims to support people in a poor neighbourhood in Dhaka to build their...
-
A resource designed to help organisations, teams and individuals manage innovation journeys responsibly and successfully. We have partnered with MIT D-Lab to develop a new resource to drive greater diversity and inclusion within project design and implementation. The Participation for Humanitarian Innovation (PfHI) toolkit sets out a robust approach to setting expectations for and monitoring the degree of participation within research and innovation projects for, with, and by people...
-
A resource designed to help organisations, teams and individuals manage innovation journeys responsibly and successfully. We have partnered with MIT D-Lab to develop a new resource to drive greater diversity and inclusion within project design and implementation. The Participation for Humanitarian Innovation (PfHI) toolkit sets out a robust approach to setting expectations for and monitoring the degree of participation within research and innovation projects for, with, and by people...
-
The Program Cycle is USAID’s operational model for planning, delivering, assessing, and adapting development programming in a given region or country to advance U.S. foreign policy. It encompasses guidance and procedures for: 1) Making strategic decisions at the regional or country level about programmatic areas of focus and associated resources; 2) Designing supportive projects and/or activities to implement these strategic plans; and 3) Learning from performance monitoring, evaluations,...
-
Addressing 21st century development challenges requires investments in innovation, including the use of new approaches and technologies. Currently, many development organisations prioritise investments in isolated innovation pilots that leverage a specific approach or technology rather than pursuing a strategic approach to expand the organisation’s toolbox with innovations that have proven their comparative advantage over what is currently used. This Working Paper addresses this challenge of...
-
Participatory action research (PAR) is an approach to research that prioritizes the value of experiential knowledge for tackling problems caused by unequal and harmful social systems, and for envisioning and implementing alternatives. PAR involves the participation and leadership of those people experiencing issues, who take action to produce emancipatory social change, through conducting systematic research to generate new knowledge. This Primer sets out key considerations for the design of...
-
How can donors and grantees work together to create effective monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) practices that drive field-wide transformation?
-
In a previous post we reflected on how a key learning from our “project to portfolio” journey to date is that it is ultimately about mustering the organizational will to transform. If the early days of our innovation work were about demonstrating results quickly and creating space for experimentation, now the challenge is of a different order. Eventually this means helping UNDP transition to a different value proposition and business model, as eloquently articulated by Gerd Trogemann: “No...
-
Achieving impact through research for development programmes (R4D) requires engagement with diverse stakeholders across the research, development and policy divides. Understanding how such programmes support the emergence of outcomes, therefore, requires a focus on the relational aspects of engagement and collaboration. Increasingly, evaluation of large research collaborations is employing social network analysis (SNA), making use of its relational view of causation. In this paper, we use...
-
Large publicly funded programmes of research continue to receive increased investment as interventions aiming to produce impact for the world’s poorest and most marginalized populations. At this intersection of research and development, research is expected to contribute to complex processes of societal change. Embracing a co-produced view of impact as emerging along uncertain causal pathways often without predefined outcomes calls for innovation in the use of complexity-aware approaches to...
-
The United Kingdom Research and Innovation (UKRI) Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) aimed to address global challenges to achieve the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals through 12 interdisciplinary research hubs. This research documents key lessons learned around working with Theory of Change (ToC) to guide Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) within these complex research for development hubs. Interviews and document reviews were conducted in ten of the research...
-
Research for development (R4D) funding is increasingly expected to demonstrate value for money (VfM). However, the dominance of positivist approaches to evaluating VfM, such as cost-benefit analysis, do not fully account for the complexity of R4D funds and risk undermining efforts to contribute to transformational development. This paper posits an alternative approach to evaluating VfM, using the UK’s Global Challenges Research Fund and the Newton Fund as case studies. Based on a...
-
The complexity of issues addressed by research for development (R4D) requires collaborations between partners from a range of disciplines and cultural contexts. Power asymmetries within such partnerships may obstruct the fair distribution of resources, responsibilities and benefits across all partners. This paper presents a cross-case analysis of five R4D partnership evaluations, their methods and how they unearthed and addressed power asymmetries. It contributes to the field of R4D...
-
Research for development (R4D) aims to make a tangible difference to development challenges, but these effects typically take years to emerge. Evaluation (especially impact evaluation) often takes place before there is evidence of development impact. In this paper, we focus on opportunities for assessing the potential for impact at earlier stages in the research and innovation process. We argue that such a focus can help research programme managers and evaluators learn about the...
-
Criticism that the development sector has not delivered in terms of eliminating extreme poverty, fast-tracking growth and preventing conflict, is neither new nor surprising. In fact, it may be the one thing that scholars, donors and practitioners agree on. While many of these concerns are valid, this book makes a case that the sector is closer to unlocking the gates to more effective and efficient development outcomes than is popularly believed. Specifically, it argues that by overturning a...
-
A model I've been using a lot recently, to bring systems thinking to life, is the Berkana Two Loop model. It doesn't describe complexity or systems thinking. But it does describe systems change in a way that's simple and oriented to action.
-
Evaluation practitioners in the international development sector have given considerable attention in recent years to process tracing as a method for evaluating impact, including discussion of how to assess the relative importance of causal factors. Despite the increasing interest, there is a relative dearth of examples of practical learning and evidence of applying process tracing in practice. This CDI Practice Paper draws on comparative learning from applying three different types of...
Explore
Theme
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(56)
- Adaptive Learning (6)
- Adaptive Management (16)
- Agile & Lean approaches (1)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (3)
- Design Thinking / HCD (3)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (6)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (2)
- Other Adaptive approaches (2)
-
Other sectors
(6)
- Logistics & Product Development (1)
- Organizational Management (3)
- Project management (2)
- Psychology (1)
- Sport (1)
- Participation (3)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (1)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (2)
- Positive Deviance & 2 loops model (2)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (19)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (2)
- Cases (11)
- Courses (1)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(23)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (2)
- GIZ (Germany) (1)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- NGO Perspectives (5)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (1)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (2)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (4)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (4)
- USAID (7)
-
Geography
(8)
-
Africa
(3)
- Central Africa (1)
- Eastern Africa (1)
- Northern Africa (1)
- West Africa (2)
-
Americas
(1)
- Central America (1)
- South America (1)
-
Asia
(6)
-
South-eastern Asia
(3)
- Myanmar (2)
- Philippines (1)
- Thailand (1)
- Timor Leste (1)
-
Southern Asia
(4)
- Bangladesh (3)
- India (1)
- Nepal (1)
- Pakistan (1)
- Sri Lanka (1)
- Western Asia (1)
-
South-eastern Asia
(3)
-
Africa
(3)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(51)
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (1)
- After Action Reviews (1)
- Artificial Intelligence (4)
- Case Study (1)
- Causal Mechanisms (1)
- Circular charts applications (radar, pie, sunburst, spiderweb, orbic, etc) (1)
- Cost-Benefit Analysis (1)
- Ex-post Evaluation (1)
- Feedback Systems (1)
- Impact evaluation (1)
- Innovation System Analysis (1)
- Knowledge Management (1)
- MEL Bricolage (1)
- MEL in International Development (5)
- Network Analysis (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (1)
- Participatory Action Research (3)
- Participatory Evaluation (2)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (1)
- Portfolio Management (3)
- Power Analysis (1)
- Process Tracing (2)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (2)
- Realist Evaluation (2)
- Rubrics (7)
- Scenario Planning (1)
- Systemic Change (10)
- Systems Mapping (3)
- Theory-based evaluations (2)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (5)
- Value for Investment (2)
- Value for Money (2)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (3)
- Organizations (1)
-
Practical
(20)
- Tools (5)
-
Sectors [+]
(42)
- Advocacy and Activism (1)
- Agriculture (1)
- Alternative Development (7)
- Cash Trasfers (1)
- Children (2)
- Economic development (5)
- Employment (1)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (2)
- Governance and Accountability (7)
- Humanitarian Aid (2)
- Innovation (in Development) (10)
- Institutional Reform (1)
- Knowledge to Practice (2)
- Locally driven development (1)
- Locally led development (2)
- Organizational Change (2)
- Research for Development (R4D) (6)
- Scaling up / Propagating (7)
- Social Accountability (1)
- Social Change (2)
- Social Protection (1)
- Technology (in Development) (3)
- Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) (1)
Resource type
- Blog Post (24)
- Book (7)
- Conference Paper (1)
- Journal Article (21)
- Magazine Article (3)
- Report (38)
- Video Recording (2)
- Web Page (3)