Your search
Results 91 resources
-
Development donors invest significantly in governance reform, including in contexts characterised by conflict and fragility. However, there is relatively little comparative study of their change strategies, and little understanding of what works and why. This paper explores the strategies of six recent DFID-funded programmes in Mozambique, Myanmar, and Pakistan with empowerment and accountability aims. Document review and field interviews are used to analyse the application of multi-scalar...
-
As with all public policy work, education policies are demanding. Policy workers need to ‘know’ a lot—about the problems they are addressing, the people who need to be engaged, the promises they can make in response, the context they are working in, and the processes they will follow to implement. Most policy workers answer questions about such issues within the structures of plan and control processes used to devise budgets and projects. These structures limit their knowledge gathering,...
-
Children end up in child labour as a result of many, often unknown or hidden, interactions between multiple actors and multiple factors within households, communities, and labour systems, leading to unpredictable outcomes for children and other sector stakeholders and sometimes resulting in the worst forms of child labour (WFCL). It is a complex problem, and interventions aimed at tackling it are also, inevitably, complex and challenging. The way they influence change is non-linear,...
-
Executive Summary Understanding how civil society can get government to respond to their needs, preferences and demands, and deliver goods and services to citizens is a central concern in social accountability initiatives. It is widely argued that sanctions make a key difference to service delivery outcomes, and that without them, transparency and accountability interventions are less likely to be effective and less likely to be sustainable (Anderson et al., 2020; Arugay, 2016; Fox, 2020;...
-
Localisation and locally led international development practice has long been discussed, but has still not been delivered. Systemic barriers have posed challenges, and the term itself is contested. Now, the last tumultuous 18 months could provide a critical juncture to finally move forward with this crucial agenda. The pandemic has highlighted structural inequalities in the global system, and disrupted ways of working in the international development sector. The Black Lives Matter movement...
-
What does governance look like ‘from below’ – from the perspectives of poor and marginalised households? How do patterns of conflict affect that? These were the questions at the heart of the Governance at the Margins research project. Over three years from 2017-2020 we worked to explore this through in-depth study in conflict-affected areas of Mozambique, Myanmar, and Pakistan. Our research teams interviewed the same people regularly over that time, finding out how they resolved problems and...
-
The conversation on adaptive management has grown fast amongst development actors. These conversations often focus on designing, commissioning, and managing large-scale development programmes. Exactly how this impacts the frontline, the implementers, and day-to-day project delivery is still being debated. Yet, perspectives drawn directly from practice are often largely missing within these debates. This paper is written by two development practitioners. Through this paper, we reflect on the...
-
Multiple aid agencies often try to support change in the same places, at the same time, and with similar actors. Surprisingly, their interactions and combined effects are rarely explored. This Policy Briefing describes findings from research conducted on recent aid programmes that overlapped in Mozambique, Nigeria, and Pakistan, and from a webinar with UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) advisors and practitioners. The research found three distinct categories of ‘interaction...
-
Organising for Systems Innovation at Scale Our team at Griffith Centre for Systems Innovation have been experimenting with and evolving a Challenge-led Innovation Approach (based on Mission-oriented approaches developed by Mariana Mazzucato at UCL IIPP and others internationally). We are using this approach to guide the way we work internally and engage with our systems innovation partners. We’ve facilitated intensive Re:Treats, worked with government bodies, businesses and civic...
-
CLARISSA (Child Labour: Action-Research-Innovation in South and South-Eastern Asia) is a large-scale Participatory Action Research programme which aims to identify, evidence, and promote effective multi-stakeholder action to tackle the drivers of the worst forms of child labour in selected supply chains in Bangladesh, Nepal, and Myanmar. CLARISSA places a particular focus on participants’ own ‘agency’. In other words, participants’ ability to understand the situation they face, and to...
-
Adaptive management approaches potentially offer us opportunities to deliver high quality results in circumstances where change is complex, including in fragile, unstable or conflict affected places. However, building adaptive programming continues to be a challenge for the sector. For CARE, our Department for International Development -UK Aid funded Girls’ Education Challenge (GEC) programming has provided useful learning on how to operationalise adaptive approaches. In this paper we expand...
-
What can middle-level theory do? Middle-level theory (MLT) has several uses in development planning and evaluation. It helps predict whether a programme can be expected to work in a new setting. It offers insights into what design features are needed for success. It provides invaluable information for monitoring to see if the programme is on track and to fix problems that arise. It reveals the causal processes and related assumptions to be tested in an evaluation and helps identify...
-
A discussion of initial learning emerging from the SLRC ’Adaptive approaches to reducing teenage pregnancy in Sierra Leone’ action research project.
-
This report summarises the discussions at a meeting held in September 2019 of a group of global development research and policy experts and practitioners, convened by ODI and the Westminster Foundation for Democracy, to share experiences and knowledge, reflect on what we already know about working politically on gender in fragile and conflict-affected settings (FCAS), and identify what further evidence would be useful. Key messages: - It is important to identify, document and learn from...
-
This Green Paper intends to review key elements of the problem that Development actors will confront as a new decade opens up ahead of us. It will articulate a solution that we believe should become an inherent feature of Development programs and initiatives. This is the outcome of an intense period of experiences and reflections in the Development space across different geographies and institutional mandates and activities, during which the Foundation has collaborated with institutions such...
-
The Covid-19 Responses for Equity (CORE) programme was a three-year initiative funded by the Canadian International Development Research Centre (IDRC) that brought together 20 projects from across the global South to understand the socioeconomic impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic, improve existing responses, and generate better policy options for recovery. The research covered 42 countries across Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East to understand the ways in which the pandemic...
-
How can donors and grantees work together to create effective monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) practices that drive field-wide transformation? The Open Society Foundation’s Fiscal Governance Program found success by focusing on six key approaches, including empowering grantees and relinquishing power. In 2021, an external close-out evaluation by Intention to Impact of the program (which ran for 7 years and gave over $150 million in grants) revealed something pretty remarkable—the...
-
This learning paper provides guidance to humanitarian innovators on how to use evidence to enable and drive adoption of innovation. Innovation literature and practice show time and time again that it is difficult to scale innovations. Even when an innovation is demonstrably impactful, better than the existing solution and good value for money, it does not automatically get adopted or used in mainstream humanitarian programming. Why do evidence-based innovations face difficulties in scaling...
-
The Cynefin Centre’s Citizen Engagement & Democratic Innovation programme provides tools for collective sense-making in the areas of community development and youth work; civic engagement and democratic innovation; collaborative service/policy design and evaluation; housing/tenant engagement; futures and planning; shared learning and peer to peer knowledge exchange.
Explore
Theme
-
Sectors [+]
- Advocacy and Activism (1)
- Agriculture (1)
- Alternative Development (7)
- Cash Trasfers (1)
- Children (7)
- Citizen Engagement (1)
- Climate Change (4)
- Economic development (5)
- Education (4)
- Employment (1)
- Environmental Management (3)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (4)
- Gender (7)
- Governance and Accountability (20)
- Health (2)
- Humanitarian Aid (5)
-
Innovation (in Development)
(12)
- Funding (1)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (6)
- Institutional Reform (4)
- Judicial systems (1)
- Knowledge to Practice (4)
- Locally driven development (8)
- NGOs (5)
- Organizational Change (7)
- Pastoralism (1)
- Peace Building (1)
- Scaling up / Propagating (5)
- Social Accountability (9)
- Technology (in Development) (4)
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(60)
- Adaptive Learning (9)
- Adaptive Management (29)
- Agile & Lean approaches (3)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (1)
- Design Thinking / HCD (2)
- Human Learning Systems (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (4)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (2)
- Other Adaptive approaches (2)
-
Other sectors
(2)
- Government (1)
- Organizational Management (1)
- Participation (3)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (5)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (19)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (4)
- Cases (20)
- Courses (2)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(36)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (4)
- GIZ (Germany) (6)
- Hivos - Netherlands (1)
- Irish Aid (1)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- NGO Perspectives (8)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (1)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (3)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (2)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (3)
- USAID (11)
-
Geography
(30)
-
Africa
(16)
- Central Africa (2)
- Eastern Africa (10)
- Northern Africa (1)
-
Southern Africa
(1)
- South Africa (1)
-
West Africa
(8)
- Benim (1)
- Nigeria (4)
- Senegal (1)
- Sierra Leone (2)
-
Americas
(3)
-
Central America
(2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (1)
- South America (3)
-
Central America
(2)
-
Asia
(15)
-
South-eastern Asia
(4)
- Myanmar (3)
- Philippines (1)
- Thailand (1)
- Timor Leste (1)
-
Southern Asia
(10)
- Bangladesh (5)
- India (1)
- Nepal (5)
- Pakistan (4)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
South-eastern Asia
(4)
-
Europe
(2)
-
Northern Europe
(1)
- United Kingdom (1)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
- Spain (1)
-
Northern Europe
(1)
- Many geographies (2)
-
Africa
(16)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(42)
- After Action Reviews (2)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Context Monitoring (1)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (1)
- Diaries (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (1)
- Ex-post Evaluation (1)
- Impact evaluation (3)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (1)
- Innovation System Analysis (1)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (1)
- MEL in International Development (2)
- Outcome Harvesting (1)
- Outcome Mapping (1)
- Participatory Action Research (4)
- Participatory Evaluation (1)
- Political Economy Analysis (3)
- Portfolio Management (3)
- Process Tracing (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (1)
- Realist Evaluation (1)
- Rigour (2)
- Rubrics (2)
- SenseMaker (1)
- Stakeholder analysis (1)
- Strategy testing (1)
- Surveys (1)
- Sustainability (1)
- Systemic Change (9)
- Systems Mapping (4)
- Theory-based evaluations (1)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (4)
- Value for Money (1)
-
Practical
(26)
- Tools (2)