Your search
Publication year
Results 21 resources
-
Most people agree that monitoring and evaluation (M&E) should be used for both learning and accountability. However, there is no consensus about which one is more important. The debate matters as there is sometimes tension between the two purposes. In the past there has often been a disconnect between M&E and learning. Many M&E systems are primarily designed to enable accountability to donors.
Last update from database: 11/05/2024, 12:30 (UTC)
Explore
Theme
- Adaptive Approaches [+]
- Cases (2)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(5)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (2)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (1)
- USAID (2)
-
Geography
(4)
-
Africa
(2)
-
Eastern Africa
(2)
- Kenya (1)
- Mozambique (1)
- Uganda (1)
-
West Africa
(1)
- Nigeria (1)
-
Eastern Africa
(2)
-
Asia
(2)
-
Southern Asia
(2)
- Bangladesh (2)
- Nepal (1)
-
Southern Asia
(2)
-
Europe
(1)
-
Northern Europe
(1)
- United Kingdom (1)
-
Northern Europe
(1)
-
Africa
(2)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(11)
- After Action Reviews (2)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (1)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowledge Management (1)
- MEL in International Development (4)
- Participatory Action Research (1)
- Process Tracing (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (1)
- Realist Evaluation (1)
- Strategy testing (1)
- Systemic Change (3)
- Systems Mapping (1)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (1)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (1)
-
Practical
(7)
- Tools (1)
-
Sectors [+]
(12)
- Alternative Development (2)
- Children (1)
- Economic development (2)
- Employment (1)
- Gender (1)
- Governance and Accountability (1)
- Humanitarian Aid (1)
- Inclusion/Disability (1)
- Innovation (in Development) (1)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (2)
- Institutional Reform (1)
- Knowledge to Practice (1)
- Locally driven development (1)
- Organizational Change (3)
- Scaling up / Propagating (1)
Resource type
- Blog Post (5)
- Journal Article (2)
- Report (13)
- Web Page (1)