Your search
Results 115 resources
-
“Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better.” --Samuel Beckett Here’s my favorite part of that quote: the ultimate goal is not a lack of failure; it’s better failures. That’s good news for CARE, because we just published round two of our Learning From Failure initiative, and…I know this will surprise everyone…we haven’t stopped failures yet. We do have some hopeful signs that we’re failing better; or at least, that we’re improving on some concrete weaknesses we identified in...
-
Adaptive management approaches potentially offer us opportunities to deliver high quality results in circumstances where change is complex, including in fragile, unstable or conflict affected places. However, building adaptive programming continues to be a challenge for the sector. For CARE, our Department for International Development -UK Aid funded Girls’ Education Challenge (GEC) programming has provided useful learning on how to operationalise adaptive approaches. In this paper we expand...
-
Planning for and assessing system change is a strategic management issue. It is critical for everything from developing a strategy and designing interventions, to adapting strategy, improving implementation and reporting impact. But many programmes get stuck when it comes to assessing system change. The private sector development field has struggled to agree on an approach that programmes can implement and stakeholders can understand. However some mature programmes are starting to assess...
-
Planning for and assessing system change is a strategic management issue. It is critical for everything from developing a strategy and designing interventions, to adapting strategy, improving implementation and reporting impact. But many programmes get stuck when it comes to assessing system change. The private sector development field has struggled to agree on an approach that programmes can implement and stakeholders can understand. However some mature programmes are starting to assess...
-
Most people agree that monitoring and evaluation (M&E) should be used for both learning and accountability. However, there is no consensus about which one is more important. The debate matters as there is sometimes tension between the two purposes. In the past there has often been a disconnect between M&E and learning. Many M&E systems are primarily designed to enable accountability to donors.
-
This briefing note looks at how the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Wildlife Asia programme has operationalised the concepts of adaptive rigour and adaptive management as part of its approach to collaborating, learning and adapting. As described by the Global Learning for Adaptive Management (GLAM) initiative, adaptive rigour is about ensuring that the data, information, methods, processes and systems that underpin adaptive management are robust, systematic and...
-
This briefing note focuses on the remote collection and use of data for adaptive management during the Covid-19 pandemic, setting out key considerations to help practitioners think through a transition from more ‘traditional’ monitoring, evaluation and learning (MEL) to MEL for adaptive management (MEL4AM) that reflects the unique data collection challenges presented by Covid-19. The brief provides an overview of some key considerations in remote data collection, when this is required, and...
-
This paper proposes that pastoralist systems are better treated, in aggregate, as a global critical infrastructure. The policy and management implications that follow are significant and differ importantly from current pastoralist policies and recommendations. A multi-typology framework is presented, identifying the conditions under which pastoralists can be considered real-time reliability professionals in systems with mandates preventing or otherwise avoiding key events from happening....
-
A discussion of initial learning emerging from the SLRC ’Adaptive approaches to reducing teenage pregnancy in Sierra Leone’ action research project.
-
This report summarises the discussions at a meeting held in September 2019 of a group of global development research and policy experts and practitioners, convened by ODI and the Westminster Foundation for Democracy, to share experiences and knowledge, reflect on what we already know about working politically on gender in fragile and conflict-affected settings (FCAS), and identify what further evidence would be useful. Key messages: - It is important to identify, document and learn from...
-
• This paper looks at the experience of gender mainstreaming in the Institutions for Inclusive Development (I4ID) programme – an adaptive, politically smart governance programme in Tanzania. • When development programmes try to engage with political stakeholders and align with the priorities of wider coalitions there is a danger that gender equality is de-prioritised. • It is important that formal political economy analysis, as well as other data collection, analysis and consultation...
-
- This short paper draws out lessons for working effectively with and through partners, based on the experience of the Institutions for Inclusive Development (I4ID) programme – an adaptive, politically smart governance programme in Tanzania. • Cultivating effective partnerships can be a key part of delivering locally legitimate projects that have the potential to create sustainable change. Adaptive and politically informed ways of working create specific opportunities and challenges for...
-
• This paper looks critically at the approach to value for money (VfM) in the Institutions for Inclusive Development (I4ID) programme – an adaptive, politically smart governance programme in Tanzania. • Adaptive, politically smart programmes like I4ID aim to deliver VfM by learning about what will work in complex environments, and quickly incorporating those lessons into delivery. When functioning properly, they can rapidly wind down activities as new information emerges and divert funding...
-
The LEARN contract and the United States Agency for International Development/Bureau of Policy, Planning, and Learning (USAID/PPL) are managing an area of work known as the Evidence Base for Collaborating, Learning, and Adapting (EB4CLA). The purpose of this work is to answer the following key learning questions: ● Does an intentional, systematic, and resourced approach to collaborating, learning, and adapting (CLA) contribute to organizational effectiveness and/or development outcomes? ●...
-
USAID’s Bureau for Policy, Planning and Learning and its LEARN support contract are working to integrate systematic, intentional and resourced collaborating, learning and adapting (CLA) throughout program planning and implementation to achieve more effective development programs. As part of this effort, USAID is exploring several approaches to understand whether and how strategic collaboration, continuous learning and adaptive management make a difference to organizational effectiveness and...
-
Internal and external stakeholders have different information needs over a project’s life, for purposes that include adaptive management, accountability, compliance, reporting and learning. A project’s monitoring, evaluation, accountability and learning, or MEAL, system should provide the information needed by these stakeholders at the level of statistical reliability, detail and timing appropriate to inform data use. In emergency contexts where the situation is still fluid, ‘informal...
Explore
Theme
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
- Adaptive Learning (13)
- Adaptive Management (51)
- Adaptive Rigour (2)
- Agile & Lean approaches (6)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (8)
- Design Thinking / HCD (6)
- Human Learning Systems (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (4)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (2)
- Other Adaptive approaches (2)
-
Other sectors
(2)
- Government (1)
- Organizational Management (1)
- Participation (4)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (1)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (7)
- Positive Deviance & 2 loops model (1)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (35)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (10)
- Cases (17)
- Courses (3)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(43)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- DANIDA - Danish International Development Agency (1)
- DCED - Donor Committee for Enterprise Development (2)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (7)
- GIZ (Germany) (4)
- Irish Aid (1)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- NGO Perspectives (11)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (2)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (4)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (1)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (2)
- USAID (12)
-
Geography
(27)
-
Africa
(16)
-
Central Africa
(3)
- Angola (1)
- Cameroon (1)
- Democratic Republic of the Congo (1)
- Eastern Africa (10)
- Northern Africa (1)
-
Southern Africa
(3)
- South Africa (3)
-
West Africa
(7)
- Nigeria (4)
- Senegal (1)
- Sierra Leone (2)
-
Central Africa
(3)
-
Americas
(2)
-
Central America
(2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (1)
- South America (2)
-
Central America
(2)
-
Asia
(13)
-
South-eastern Asia
(3)
- Myanmar (2)
- Philippines (1)
- Thailand (1)
- Timor Leste (1)
-
Southern Asia
(7)
- Bangladesh (3)
- India (1)
- Nepal (5)
- Pakistan (2)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
South-eastern Asia
(3)
-
Europe
(1)
-
Northern Europe
(1)
- United Kingdom (1)
-
Northern Europe
(1)
- Many geographies (2)
-
Africa
(16)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(54)
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (1)
- After Action Reviews (2)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Context Monitoring (1)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (1)
- Ex-post Evaluation (1)
- Impact evaluation (1)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (2)
- Innovation System Analysis (1)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (2)
- MEL Bricolage (1)
- MEL in International Development (5)
- Narrative Based Approaches (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (1)
- Outcome Mapping (1)
- Participatory Action Research (3)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (1)
- Political Economy Analysis (3)
- Portfolio Management (3)
- Process Tracing (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (1)
- Realist Evaluation (1)
- Rubrics (2)
- SenseMaker (1)
- Strategy testing (1)
- Surveys (1)
- Systemic Change (20)
- Systems Mapping (2)
- Theory-based evaluations (1)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (4)
- Value for Money (2)
-
Practical
(39)
- Tools (3)
-
Sectors [+]
(60)
- Agriculture (1)
- Alternative Development (6)
- Cash Trasfers (1)
- Children (3)
- Citizen Engagement (1)
- Climate Change (3)
- Economic development (5)
- Education (4)
- Environmental Management (3)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (4)
- Gender (6)
- Governance and Accountability (7)
- Health (1)
- Humanitarian Aid (4)
-
Innovation (in Development)
(9)
- Funding (1)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (3)
- Institutional Reform (4)
- Knowledge to Practice (2)
- Locally driven development (3)
- NGOs (2)
- Organizational Change (6)
- Pastoralism (1)
- Peace Building (1)
- Scaling up / Propagating (5)
- Social Accountability (3)
- Technology (in Development) (3)