Your search
Results 97 resources
-
Internal and external stakeholders have different information needs over a project’s life, for purposes that include adaptive management, accountability, compliance, reporting and learning. A project’s monitoring, evaluation, accountability and learning, or MEAL, system should provide the information needed by these stakeholders at the level of statistical reliability, detail and timing appropriate to inform data use. In emergency contexts where the situation is still fluid, ‘informal...
-
A step-by-step guide on how to develop a Transformative Theory of Change, for innovation projects, programmes and organisations working on systems transformation. The MOTION project was initiated with one key question in mind: how can we help projects and organisations be more transformative, using the framework and concept provided by the multi-level perspective? And what kind of tools, methods and frameworks can we co-design that translate scientific concepts into practises relevant for...
-
Adaptive programmes recognise that certain changes, particularly in behaviours, are complex, non-linear and difficult to measure. This briefing note explores the use of outcome mapping (OM) as a monitoring, evaluation and learning (MEL) approach to track behavioural change and inform adaptation for two programmes: the Pathways to Resilience in Semi-arid Economies (PRISE) research consortium and the Accountability in Tanzania programme (AcT I and AcT II). It discusses the implementation of...
-
Essential points for practitioners and donors • Mediation offers a cost-effective and proven method for resolving armed conflict. Between 1985 and 2015, 75 per cent of armed conflicts in the world were resolved through agreement rather than by force. In most cases these processes will have involved third party facilitation or support. • Professional mediators understand the high stakes involved in their work to prevent, mitigate and resolve armed conflict. In addition, they and their...
-
Evaluation practitioners in the international development sector have given considerable attention in recent years to process tracing as a method for evaluating impact, including discussion of how to assess the relative importance of causal factors. Despite the increasing interest, there is a relative dearth of examples of practical learning and evidence of applying process tracing in practice. This CDI Practice Paper draws on comparative learning from applying three different types of...
-
There is a glaring gap and compelling need for approaches and methods that realign to new rigour through timeliness, cost-effectiveness, relevance and being actionable. Over the past few years, the Sanitation Learning Hub, in collaboration with the Government of India, Praxis, WSSCC and WaterAid India, have been developing Rapid Action Learning approaches. Multiple approaches have been trialled, with flexible formats, but the essential criteria is that learning is timely, relevant and...
-
- This short paper draws out lessons for working effectively with and through partners, based on the experience of the Institutions for Inclusive Development (I4ID) programme – an adaptive, politically smart governance programme in Tanzania. • Cultivating effective partnerships can be a key part of delivering locally legitimate projects that have the potential to create sustainable change. Adaptive and politically informed ways of working create specific opportunities and challenges for...
-
Rigorous Impact Evaluation in GIZ Governance Programmes (How-To-Note)von Schiller, A. - 2020 - Bonn
Why should I integrate an impact assessment in my programme? How will the programme benefit from it? Are the benefits worth the effort and expenses? How do I design and implement it in detail? Who is addressable for support? What should I pay attention to in order to get the most out of it? This note is meant to answer these questions. It addresses leaders and project staff of governance programmes who are interested in using this tool within their specific governance programme or project....
-
When social accountability interventions scale up and their sustainability depends on the interactions of many agents and system components, related results are rarely observable at the end of an intervention. The 2019 OECD Development Assistance Committee’s (OECD DAC) revamped evaluations criteria for assessing sustainability acknowledges that such results are often emergent, and should be monitored and evaluated with this in mind. It therefore emphasizes a turn towards assessing complex...
-
Multiple aid agencies often try to support change in the same places, at the same time, and with similar actors. Surprisingly, their interactions and combined effects are rarely explored. This Policy Briefing describes findings from research conducted on recent aid programmes that overlapped in Mozambique, Nigeria, and Pakistan, and from a webinar with UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) advisors and practitioners. The research found three distinct categories of ‘interaction...
-
Based on experience from running Sensemaking workshops for UNDP offices and government partners, the Asia-Pacific Regional Innovation Centre developed the Sensemaking Preparation Guide and Facilitator Guide to share its knowledge with teams and organization that are interested in using the Sensemaking process.
-
How can donors and grantees work together to create effective monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) practices that drive field-wide transformation? The Open Society Foundation’s Fiscal Governance Program found success by focusing on six key approaches, including empowering grantees and relinquishing power. In 2021, an external close-out evaluation by Intention to Impact of the program (which ran for 7 years and gave over $150 million in grants) revealed something pretty remarkable—the...
-
This Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document is written for Small Foundation network partners. It accompanies Network Partner Evaluation Toolkit, which outlines four evaluation tools that Small Foundation is encouraging, and supporting, its network partners to use to improve their operations and, ultimately, increase their impact. This FAQ document answers typical questions about these evaluation tools and provides additional detailed recommendations for how network coordinators can...
-
Capturing the impact of community-led work The Centre for Public Impact, Dusseldorp Forum, and Hands Up Mallee have been exploring how stories can be used to more effectively communicate the impact of community-led systems change work. Community-led place based initiatives are modelling new ways of working - shifting away from top down, program-focussed approaches towards an approach grounded in systems thinking and community-led innovations. However, while these stories of change are...
-
This guidebook codifies the principles and methods of applying systems change and portfolio approaches to complex development challenges with practical tools and examples. It is based on the empirical learning generated from the collaborative initiatives in UNDP Country Offices in Bhutan, Pakistan, the Philippines, and Viet Nam with support from Regional Innovation Centre for Asia and the Pacific.
-
In Building Better Systems, we introduced four keys to unlock system innovation: purpose and power, relationships and resource flows. These four keys make up a set. Systems are often hard to change because power, relationships, and resource flows are locked together in a reinforcing pattern to serve the system’s current purpose. Systems start to change fundamentally when this pattern is disrupted and opened up. Then a new configuration can emerge, serving a new purpose. In this essay...
-
Systemcraft is our applied framework to help leaders and organisations get started and keep going when faced with complex problems. It is built on our practical experience. It draws on a broad body of research, action and theory from the worlds of complexity thinking, systems theory, adaptive management, leadership development, social movements, development theory and beyond. Systemcraft has been designed to make systems thinking something any leader can apply when they find themselves faced...
-
This guide is a basic reference on systems thinking and practice tailored to the context and needs of the UK Government’s Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO). It is an output of the FCDO Knowledge for Development Programme (K4D), which facilitated a Learning Journey on Systems Thinking and Practice with FCDO staff during 2021 and 2022. The guide offers a common language and shared framing of systems thinking for FCDO and its partners. It explores what this implies for...
-
Addressing 21st century development challenges requires investments in innovation, including the use of new approaches and technologies. Currently, many development organisations prioritise investments in isolated innovation pilots that leverage a specific approach or technology rather than pursuing a strategic approach to expand the organisation’s toolbox with innovations that have proven their comparative advantage over what is currently used. This Working Paper addresses this challenge of...
Explore
Theme
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (2)
- After Action Reviews (2)
- Beneficiary Assessment/Engagement (3)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Circular charts applications (radar, pie, sunburst, spiderweb, orbic, etc) (1)
- Context Monitoring (1)
- Contribution Analysis (3)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (1)
- Diaries (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (1)
- Evaluability assessment (1)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (2)
- Ex-post Evaluation (2)
- Feedback Systems (3)
- Impact evaluation (3)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (2)
- Innovation System Analysis (1)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (2)
- MEL Bricolage (1)
- MEL in International Development (8)
- Narrative Based Approaches (1)
- Network Analysis (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (1)
- Outcome Mapping (3)
- Participatory Action Research (6)
- Participatory Evaluation (2)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (1)
- Political Economy Analysis (3)
- Portfolio Management (5)
- Positive Deviance (2)
- Post Project Evaluations (1)
- Process Tracing (3)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (4)
- Realist Evaluation (1)
- Remote Monitoring (1)
- Rigour (2)
- Rubrics (6)
- SenseMaker (1)
- Stakeholder analysis (1)
- Strategy testing (1)
- Surveys (1)
- Sustainability (3)
- Systemic Change (20)
- Systems Mapping (4)
- Tech 4 MEL (4)
- Theory-based evaluations (2)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (7)
- Value for Investment (1)
- Value for Money (3)
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(54)
- Adaptive Learning (9)
- Adaptive Management (20)
- Adaptive Rigour (1)
- Agile & Lean approaches (1)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (4)
- Design Thinking / HCD (2)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (4)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (1)
- Participation (2)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (3)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (21)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (3)
- Cases (15)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(30)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (7)
- GIZ (Germany) (5)
- Hivos - Netherlands (1)
- Irish Aid (1)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- NGO Perspectives (6)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (1)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (2)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (1)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (3)
- USAID (9)
-
Geography
(21)
-
Africa
(12)
-
Central Africa
(1)
- Angola (1)
- Eastern Africa (11)
- Northern Africa (2)
-
Southern Africa
(1)
- South Africa (1)
-
West Africa
(8)
- Benim (1)
- Niger (2)
- Nigeria (3)
- Senegal (1)
- Sierra Leone (1)
-
Central Africa
(1)
-
Americas
(5)
-
Central America
(4)
- Ecuador (2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (3)
- South America (3)
-
Central America
(4)
-
Asia
(14)
-
South-eastern Asia
(1)
- Indonesia (1)
-
Southern Asia
(10)
- Bangladesh (5)
- India (1)
- Nepal (6)
- Pakistan (3)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
South-eastern Asia
(1)
-
Europe
(2)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
- Spain (1)
-
Western Europe
(1)
- Germany (1)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
-
Africa
(12)
-
Practical
(24)
- Tools (1)
-
Sectors [+]
(42)
- Agriculture (1)
- Alternative Development (2)
- Cash Trasfers (1)
- Children (7)
- Citizen Engagement (1)
- Climate Change (2)
- Economic development (5)
- Education (3)
- Employment (1)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (2)
- Gender (2)
- Governance and Accountability (10)
- Humanitarian Aid (2)
- Innovation (in Development) (4)
- Knowledge to Practice (3)
- Locally driven development (1)
- Organizational Change (3)
- Peace Building (1)
- Scaling up / Propagating (4)
- Social Accountability (1)