Your search
Results 832 resources
-
This toolkit presents entry points and references to the wide range of tools and methods that have been used to facilitate improved knowledge and learning in the development and humanitarian sectors.
-
Successfully adapting your programmatic efforts and policy engagement to the context depends on maintaining your understanding of that context. Given this, continuous learning and feedback loops--not only about your programming, but also about the environment you are working within--are important components of USAID’s work. Since our environments are always changing, in ways big and small, this can be intimidating. One can imagine a scenario where learning consumes the limited time and...
-
Tips for Conducting a Gender Analysis at the Activity or Project LevelCozzarelli, C. - 2010 - USAID
I. What is gender analysis? II. Relevant sections of the ADS III. Process – What should you do to collect the information you need to conduct a gender analysis at the activity or project level? IV. What questions should you ask in the context of doing your gender analysis? - Access - Knowledge, Beliefs, and Perceptions - Practices and Participation - Time and Space - Legal Rights and Status - Power and Decision-making IV. What should you do after you ask these questions?
-
Introduction to the Overview: Tiny Tools Why “Tiny Tools” for assessing change? Currently, change is mostly assessed by NGO staff or external experts. The vision of this paper is that communities assess and reflect change themselves and make use of that reflection with appropriate tools. All the tools presented here are relatively quick and easy to learn (therefore “tiny”). With Tiny Tools we can assess change in one session. They can therefore be used where there are not baselines. They are...
-
As the international humanitarian system faces a crisis of legitimacy, the Humanitarian Policy Group’s landmark report proposes a new model of humanitarian action.
-
We think that, applied well, theory of change can support charities and funders to take a systemic approach to their work. This report identifies five common pitfalls that organisations fall into when using theory of change, and walks through five rules of thumb that will help organisations to use the approach to tackle complex problems. We think that, applied well, theory of change can support charities and funders to take a systemic approach to their work. This report identifies five...
-
• In recent years, Political Settlements Analysis (PSA) has become increasingly influential in academic and policy circles • Despite its intuitive appeal, it seems difficult to use in practice • PSA has a natural affinity with Adaptive Development, Thinking and Working Politically, and Doing Development Differently approaches • By answering the simple diagnostic questions supplied here, development partners can identify the types of political settlements in which they work, and draw some broad operational implications
-
The Thinking and Working Politically (TWP) Community of Practice (CoP) was established at a small meeting tacked on at the end of a meeting of Governance Advisers working for the United Kingdom’s Department of International Development (DFID) on South and South-East Asian countries, held in Delhi in November 2013. Since then, a number of meetings have been held throughout the world, each addressing different issues; ‘TWP’ has entered the lexicon of mainstream development; the CoP has...
-
Thinking and Working Politically (TWP) through Applied Political Economy Analysis (PEA). A guide for practitioners Have you ever done everything right in a development program — followed every technical best practice — but still missed the mark? When this happens, it often relates to factors in the context beyond any external development actor’s ability to control.
-
The Facility for Oil Sector Transparency and Reform (FOSTER) was a £14 million programme that has helped Nigeria to transform its governance of the oil and gas industry. FOSTER ran from 2011 to mid-2016, and used an explicit ‘thinking and working politically’ (TWP) approach. It was funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID) and managed by Oxford Policy Management (OPM). This paper seeks to identify the factors that drove – or constrained – FOSTER’s achievements, and...
-
This paper discusses the steps required to build a robust evidence base for 'thinking and working politically' (TWP) in development. It argues that better understanding what works, when and why is an important step in moving TWP into mainstream development programming. The paper reviews the existing evidence base on TWP, building on this and on other literature on public sector reform and 'pockets of effectiveness' to suggest research questions, case study selection criteria, and a...
-
There now is a persuasive volume of evidence that demonstrates that capacity and technical knowledge alone are insufficient to change deeply entrenched political interests and bureaucratic norms. These critiques demonstrate that an understanding of power asymmetries is frequently the critical missing ingredient in project design and implementation. Many eminent thinkers have looked at the difference between success and failure in development, and all point to the primacy of domestic...
-
While over time theories of change have become synonymous with simple if/then statements, a strong theory of change should actually be a much more detailed, context-specific articulation of how we *theorize* change will happen under a program.
Explore
Theme
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(420)
- Adaptive Learning (42)
- Adaptive Management (174)
- Adaptive Rigour (4)
- Agile & Lean approaches (22)
- Capacity WORKS (3)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (27)
- Design Thinking / HCD (34)
- Doing Development Differently (12)
- Global Delivery Initiative (3)
- Human Learning Systems (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (12)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (4)
- Other Adaptive approaches (9)
-
Other sectors
(3)
- Government (1)
- Organizational Management (2)
- Participation (4)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (15)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (18)
- Positive Deviance & 2 loops model (5)
- Results Based Management (11)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (74)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (47)
- Cases (111)
- Courses (8)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(184)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- Canada - GAC & IDRC (6)
- DANIDA - Danish International Development Agency (2)
- DCED - Donor Committee for Enterprise Development (6)
- DFAT (Australia) (9)
- EU (1)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (38)
- G7 (1)
- GIZ (Germany) (14)
- Hivos - Netherlands (2)
- ILO (1)
- Irish Aid (2)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- New Zealand (1)
- NGO Perspectives (26)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (13)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (5)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (4)
- SDC - Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (18)
- SIDA - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (5)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (6)
- USAID (28)
- World Bank (11)
-
Geography
(102)
-
Africa
(62)
-
Central Africa
(4)
- Angola (1)
- Cameroon (1)
- Democratic Republic of the Congo (2)
-
Eastern Africa
(24)
- Ethiopia (1)
- Kenya (2)
- Malawi (2)
- Mozambique (8)
- Rwanda (2)
- Somalia (4)
- Somaliland (1)
- South Sudan (1)
- Tanzania (5)
- Uganda (3)
- Zambia (1)
- Zimbabwe (3)
- Northern Africa (2)
-
Southern Africa
(3)
- South Africa (3)
- West Africa (43)
-
Central Africa
(4)
-
Americas
(9)
-
Central America
(4)
- Ecuador (2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (3)
-
North America
(3)
- Canada (1)
- United States of America (2)
- South America (4)
-
Central America
(4)
-
Asia
(35)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
- China (1)
-
South-eastern Asia
(12)
- Cambodia (1)
- Indonesia (3)
- Myanmar (6)
- Philippines (2)
- Thailand (1)
- Timor Leste (1)
-
Southern Asia
(20)
- Afghanistan (1)
- Bangladesh (9)
- India (2)
- Nepal (11)
- Pakistan (6)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
-
Europe
(8)
-
Northern Europe
(2)
- United Kingdom (2)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
- Spain (1)
-
Western Europe
(5)
- Germany (3)
- Netherlands (1)
- Switzerland (1)
-
Northern Europe
(2)
- Many geographies (3)
-
Oceania
(3)
- Australia and New Zealand (2)
- Melanesia (1)
-
Africa
(62)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(277)
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (4)
- After Action Reviews (2)
- Appreciative Inquiry (1)
- Beneficiary Assessment/Engagement (6)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Case Study (2)
- Causal Mechanisms (1)
- Circular charts applications (radar, pie, sunburst, spiderweb, orbic, etc) (1)
- Context Monitoring (1)
- Contribution Analysis (5)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Critical Systems Heuristics (3)
- Democratic Evaluation (2)
- Desk based research/lit review (2)
- Developmental Evaluation (8)
- Diaries (1)
- Empowerment Evaluation (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (2)
- Evaluability assessment (2)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (5)
- Ex-post Evaluation (3)
- Feedback Systems (3)
- Focus Group Discussions (1)
- Horizontal Evaluation (1)
- Impact evaluation (7)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (3)
- Indicator-based approaches (4)
- Innovation History (1)
- Innovation System Analysis (3)
- Institutional Histories (2)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (4)
- Logical Framework (3)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (3)
- MEL Bricolage (1)
- MEL in International Development (12)
- Most Significant Change (3)
- Narrative Based Approaches (2)
- Network Analysis (2)
- Outcome Harvesting (8)
- Outcome Mapping (17)
- Participatory Action Research (9)
- Participatory Evaluation (8)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (4)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (2)
- Political Economy Analysis (12)
- Political Sentiment Analysis (PSA) (1)
- Portfolio Management (11)
- Positive Deviance (3)
- Post Project Evaluations (1)
- Process Tracing (3)
- Public Management Theory (1)
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (4)
- Qualitative data analysis and grounded theory (1)
- Qualitative Impact Assessment Protocol (3)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (8)
- Realist Evaluation (4)
- Remote Monitoring (1)
- Rigour (2)
- Rubrics (6)
- Scenario Planning (3)
- SenseMaker (4)
- Social Return on Investment (1)
- Stakeholder analysis (2)
- Stakeholder Feedback (2)
- Strategy testing (2)
- Success Case Method (1)
- Surveys (2)
- Sustainability (3)
- Systemic Change (25)
- Systems Mapping (4)
- Tech 4 MEL (4)
- Theory-based evaluations (4)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (30)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (3)
- Value for Investment (3)
- Value for Money (7)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (23)
-
Practical
(98)
- Tools (10)
-
Sectors [+]
(280)
- Advocacy and Activism (3)
- Agriculture (1)
- Alternative Development (39)
- Cash Trasfers (1)
- Children (7)
- Citizen Engagement (13)
- Climate Change (5)
- Combatting violent extremism (3)
- Economic development (12)
- Education (4)
- Employment (1)
- Environmental Management (11)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (11)
- Gender (9)
- Governance and Accountability (82)
- Health (4)
- Humanitarian Aid (8)
-
Innovation (in Development)
(28)
- Funding (1)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (15)
- Institutional Reform (5)
- Judicial systems (3)
- Knowledge to Practice (14)
- Locally driven development (13)
- Locally led development (2)
- NGOs (22)
- Organizational Change (9)
- Pastoralism (1)
- Peace Building (6)
- Scaling up / Propagating (14)
- Social Accountability (64)
- Technology (in Development) (16)
- Waste Management (1)
Resource type
Publication year
-
Between 2000 and 2024
- Between 2000 and 2009 (56)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (585)
- Between 2020 and 2024 (190)
-
Between 2030 and 2024
(1)
- 2034 (1)