Your search
Results 266 resources
-
In this blog we are sharing a digest of some of the many useful and innovative monitoring, evaluation and learning resources and efforts that have come through the M&E Sandbox in 2022. A lot of these resources have been shared by our community in response to the overwhelmingly positive feedback from the launch of the Sandbox (please keep them coming!). We hope you find it useful. We have grouped these efforts and resources under six broad questions: - How do we measure systems...
-
A model I've been using a lot recently, to bring systems thinking to life, is the Berkana Two Loop model. It doesn't describe complexity or systems thinking. But it does describe systems change in a way that's simple and oriented to action.
-
In a previous post we reflected on how a key learning from our “project to portfolio” journey to date is that it is ultimately about mustering the organizational will to transform. If the early days of our innovation work were about demonstrating results quickly and creating space for experimentation, now the challenge is of a different order. Eventually this means helping UNDP transition to a different value proposition and business model, as eloquently articulated by Gerd Trogemann: “No...
-
How can donors and grantees work together to create effective monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) practices that drive field-wide transformation?
-
There are a number of options when it comes to using software to help create a logic model. These range from generic word processing tools (Word, Powerpoint, or their Google Doc or Mac equivalents), to software that has been specifically tailored for visualising Theories of Change, like TOCO or Miradi. You should consider what resources you have to invest in software, both in terms of cost and in time to learn and use the features. If you only have a short timeframe and have simple needs,...
-
For AC practitioners, systems mapping is essential but also difficult. To lessen obstacles, Peter Woodrow proposes a scaffolded approach. An Experiment in “Fast Forwarding” Drawing upon our near-decade work on corruption, we recently decided to try an experiment: we would present “common patterns” of corruption as tentative models to adapt and add to—rather than try to teach people to do systems mapping from scratch. In this teaching experiment, each common pattern would function as a kind...
-
This article offers initial insights into the overlap, positioning, shared values, and convergences between RenDanHeYi compared to agile practices.
-
This is a series about Monitoring, Evaluating and Learning (MEL) whether sets of interventions/portfolios are adding more together than each one would produce on their own. In post 1, I pointed to coherence, the new OECD-DAC evaluation criteria as a way to bridge the ambition of bringing bigger change with the MEL world. In post 2, I shared 3 of 4 practical lessons I’ve learned in experimenting with MEL systems and exercises that focus explicitly on interactions of...
-
Generic, analytic, holistic, orbic, asterisc, escalieric, cephalopodic
-
This is a series about Monitoring, Evaluating and Learning (MEL) whether sets of interventions/portfolios are adding more together than each one would produce on their own. In post 1, I pointed to coherence, the new OECD-DAC evaluation criteria as a way to bridge the ambition of bringing bigger change with the MEL world. In post 2, I shared 3 of 4 practical lessons I’ve learned in experimenting with MEL systems and exercises that focus explicitly on interactions of...
-
This is a series about Monitoring, Evaluating and Learning (MEL) whether sets of interventions/portfolios are adding more together than each one would produce on their own. In post 1, I pointed to coherence, the new OECD-DAC evaluation criteria as a way to bridge the ambition of bringing bigger change with the MEL world. In post 2, I shared 3 of 4 practical lessons I’ve learned in experimenting with MEL systems and exercises that focus explicitly on interactions of...
-
Research on the Information Society, the Digital Divide and Information and Communication Technologies for development
-
Principles and processes
-
The CLARISSA Social Protection Intervention was set us as an innovative social policy intervention for tackling social ills, with a...
-
Over the last decade, the peace sector has been developing and adapting Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) systems and tools to fit their contexts and ways of working. This evolution may hold some insights for the aid community in how to go beyond more traditional, backwards-looking M&E to navigate today’s volatile, interest-based world of politics and aid.
-
You may, or may not, be surprised to hear that many theories of change lack what we might generally understand as a theory.
-
Florencia Guerzovich
-
By Millie Begovic, Head of the UNDP Strategic Innovation Unit
Explore
Theme
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(111)
- Adaptive Learning (10)
- Adaptive Management (37)
- Adaptive Rigour (3)
- Agile & Lean approaches (19)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (4)
- Design Thinking / HCD (3)
- Doing Development Differently (9)
- Human Learning Systems (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (1)
- Other Adaptive approaches (5)
-
Other sectors
(2)
- Military (2)
- Organizational Management (1)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (9)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (2)
- Positive Deviance & 2 loops model (2)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (21)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (11)
- Cases (2)
- Courses (1)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(17)
- DFAT (Australia) (4)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (4)
- Irish Aid (2)
- NGO Perspectives (2)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (1)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (3)
- USAID (1)
-
Geography
(4)
-
Africa
(1)
-
Eastern Africa
(1)
- South Sudan (1)
-
West Africa
(1)
- Mali (1)
-
Eastern Africa
(1)
-
Americas
(1)
-
South America
(1)
- Colombia (1)
-
South America
(1)
-
Asia
(2)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
- China (1)
-
Southern Asia
(1)
- Bangladesh (1)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
- Oceania (1)
-
Africa
(1)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(104)
- After Action Reviews (1)
- Appreciative Inquiry (2)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Causal Mechanisms (2)
- Circular charts applications (radar, pie, sunburst, spiderweb, orbic, etc) (1)
- Contribution Analysis (2)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Critical Systems Heuristics (3)
- Democratic Evaluation (1)
- Developmental Evaluation (2)
- Empowerment Evaluation (2)
- Ex-post Evaluation (1)
- Feedback Systems (1)
- Horizontal Evaluation (1)
- Impact evaluation (1)
- Innovation History (1)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowledge Management (2)
- Logical Framework (1)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (3)
- MEL Bricolage (1)
- MEL in International Development (5)
- Most Significant Change (1)
- Network Analysis (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (1)
- Outcome Mapping (4)
- Participatory Action Research (1)
- Participatory Evaluation (3)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (2)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (1)
- Portfolio Management (4)
- Positive Deviance (2)
- Process Tracing (1)
- Qualitative Impact Assessment Protocol (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (1)
- Realist Evaluation (1)
- Rigour (1)
- Rubrics (6)
- Rules of Thumb (2)
- SenseMaker (2)
- Social Return on Investment (2)
- Success Case Method (3)
- Sustainability (1)
- Systemic Change (6)
- Systems Mapping (3)
- Theory-based evaluations (1)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (10)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (1)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (9)
-
Practical
(10)
- Tools (1)
-
Sectors [+]
(53)
- Alternative Development (15)
- Cash Trasfers (1)
- Citizen Engagement (6)
- Governance and Accountability (15)
- Innovation (in Development) (9)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (2)
- Knowledge to Practice (3)
- Locally driven development (3)
- NGOs (3)
- Organizational Change (2)
- Peace Building (2)
- Scaling up / Propagating (1)
- Social Accountability (10)
- Social Protection (1)
- Technology (in Development) (1)