Your search
Results 281 resources
-
Development cooperation has spent decades wrangling over the merits, evidence, and implications of what we may term “the learning hypothesis”: the idea that increased knowledge by development organisations must logically lead to increased effectiveness in the performance of their development activities. Organisations of all stripes have built research and monitoring and evaluation (M&E) departments, adopted a multitude of knowledge management systems and tools, and tinkered with...
-
This report is the second in a program of evaluations that the Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) is conducting on the learning that takes place through World Bank projects. Learning and knowledge are treated as parts of a whole and are presumed to be mutually reinforcing.
-
This paper discusses how understanding the domestic political economy of climate governance is critical for developing informed strategies to build and sustain political ambition. It provides guidance and a methodology for domestic stakeholders to determine the types of institutional reforms, incentives, coalitions, and policy design that can entrench long-term political support for climate ambition. The assessment can also help users identify political barriers to more equitable climate...
-
This report explores how genuine institutional change takes place in fragile and conflict-affected states reforms can be supported.
-
With the growing number of rigorous impact evaluations worldwide, the question of how best to apply this evidence to policymaking processes has arguably become the main challenge for evidence-based policymaking. How can policymakers predict whether a policy will have the same impact in their context as it did elsewhere, and how should this influence the design and implementation of policy? This paper introduces a simple and flexible framework to address these questions of external validity...
-
On current trends, it will take decades or longer to bring basic services to the world’s most disadvantaged people. Meeting this challenge means recognising the political conditions that enable or obstruct development progress - a radical departure from the approach of the Millennium Development Goals.
-
Doing development differently rests on deliberate efforts to reflect and learn, not just about what programmes are doing and achieving, but about how they are working. This is particularly important for an action research programme like Child Labour: Action- Research-Innovation in South and South-Eastern Asia (CLARISSA), which is implemented by a consortium of organisations from across the research and development spectrum, during a rapidly changing global pandemic. Harnessing the potential...
-
This guidebook codifies the principles and methods of applying systems change and portfolio approaches to complex development challenges with practical tools and examples. It is based on the empirical learning generated from the collaborative initiatives in UNDP Country Offices in Bhutan, Pakistan, the Philippines, and Viet Nam with support from Regional Innovation Centre for Asia and the Pacific.
-
The Principles for Digital Development (download PDF here) find their roots in the efforts of individuals, development organizations, and donors alike who have called for a more concerted effort by donors and implementing partners to institutionalize lessons learned in the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in development projects.
-
Pressure is mounting on international development cooperation agencies to prove the impact of their work. Private and public commissioners as well as the general public are increasingly asking for robust evidence of impact. In this context, rigorous impact evaluation (RIE) methods are increasingly receiving attention within the broader German development system and in GIZ. Compared to other implementing agencies such as DFID or USAid, the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale...
-
Rigorous Impact Evaluation in GIZ Governance Programmes (How-To-Note)von Schiller, A. - 2020 - Bonn
Why should I integrate an impact assessment in my programme? How will the programme benefit from it? Are the benefits worth the effort and expenses? How do I design and implement it in detail? Who is addressable for support? What should I pay attention to in order to get the most out of it? This note is meant to answer these questions. It addresses leaders and project staff of governance programmes who are interested in using this tool within their specific governance programme or project....
-
This learning paper highlights how elements of outcome mapping were used by Save the Children Sweden in a project (2018-2020) that supports adolescents, affected by the Syria crisis, to become more resilient. The paper first outlines how the spheres of influence framework has been applied to develop an actor focused theory of change. It then describes how progress markers, as an alternative to SMART indicators, were formulated to monitor the programme’s results. The paper also outlines how...
-
This paper by Adinda Van Hemelrijck and Irene Guijt explores how impact evaluation can live up to standards broader than statistical rigour in ways that address challenges of complexity and enable stakeholders to engage meaningfully. A Participatory Impact Assessment and Learning Approach (PIALA) was piloted to assess and debate the impacts on rural poverty of two government programmes in Vietnam and Ghana funded by the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). We discuss the...
-
The Biodiversity How-To Guide 1: Developing Situation Models in USAID Biodiversity Programming is the first in a series of three guides that provide in-depth guidance on key tools and practices to support design teams as they design and manage biodiversity programs within the Program Cycle and in accordance with the USAID Biodiversity Policy. It focuses on how to develop situation models to map out the biodiversity conservation problem context to be addressed.
-
The Biodiversity How-To Guide 2: Using Results Chains to Depict Theories of Change in USAID Biodiversity Programming is the second in a series of three guides that provide in-depth guidance on key tools and practices to support design teams as they design and manage biodiversity programs within the Program Cycle and in accordance with the USAID Biodiversity Policy. It builds off the situation model guide to help design teams clearly state the expected results and assumptions behind the...
Explore
Theme
-
Sectors [+]
- Advocacy and Activism (3)
- Agriculture (1)
- Alternative Development (39)
- Cash Trasfers (1)
- Children (7)
- Citizen Engagement (14)
- Climate Change (5)
- Combatting violent extremism (3)
- Economic development (12)
- Education (4)
- Employment (1)
- Environmental Management (11)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (11)
- Gender (9)
- Governance and Accountability (82)
- Health (4)
- Humanitarian Aid (8)
-
Innovation (in Development)
(28)
- Funding (1)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (15)
- Institutional Reform (5)
- Judicial systems (3)
- Knowledge to Practice (14)
- Locally driven development (13)
- Locally led development (2)
- NGOs (22)
- Organizational Change (9)
- Pastoralism (1)
- Peace Building (6)
- Scaling up / Propagating (14)
- Social Accountability (64)
- Technology (in Development) (16)
- Waste Management (1)
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(131)
- Adaptive Learning (16)
- Adaptive Management (59)
- Agile & Lean approaches (6)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (3)
- Design Thinking / HCD (18)
- Doing Development Differently (4)
- Human Learning Systems (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (8)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (2)
- Other Adaptive approaches (4)
-
Other sectors
(2)
- Government (1)
- Organizational Management (1)
- Participation (3)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (5)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (25)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (17)
- Cases (52)
- Courses (2)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(54)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (8)
- GIZ (Germany) (6)
- Hivos - Netherlands (1)
- ILO (1)
- Irish Aid (1)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- NGO Perspectives (12)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (1)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (3)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (2)
- SIDA - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (1)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (3)
- USAID (14)
- World Bank (4)
-
Geography
(51)
-
Africa
(26)
- Central Africa (3)
- Eastern Africa (14)
- Northern Africa (1)
-
Southern Africa
(1)
- South Africa (1)
-
West Africa
(14)
- Benim (1)
- Nigeria (9)
- Senegal (1)
- Sierra Leone (3)
-
Americas
(4)
-
Central America
(2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (1)
- South America (4)
-
Central America
(2)
-
Asia
(27)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
- China (1)
-
South-eastern Asia
(10)
- Cambodia (1)
- Indonesia (2)
- Myanmar (5)
- Philippines (2)
- Thailand (1)
- Timor Leste (1)
-
Southern Asia
(14)
- Bangladesh (6)
- India (1)
- Nepal (7)
- Pakistan (5)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
-
Europe
(2)
-
Northern Europe
(1)
- United Kingdom (1)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
- Spain (1)
-
Northern Europe
(1)
- Many geographies (2)
-
Oceania
(1)
- Melanesia (1)
-
Africa
(26)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(72)
- After Action Reviews (2)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Context Monitoring (1)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (2)
- Diaries (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (2)
- Ex-post Evaluation (1)
- Focus Group Discussions (1)
- Impact evaluation (3)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (1)
- Innovation System Analysis (1)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (1)
- Logical Framework (1)
- MEL in International Development (4)
- Outcome Harvesting (1)
- Outcome Mapping (1)
- Participatory Action Research (6)
- Participatory Evaluation (2)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (2)
- Political Economy Analysis (5)
- Portfolio Management (4)
- Process Tracing (1)
- Public Management Theory (1)
- Qualitative data analysis and grounded theory (1)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (1)
- Realist Evaluation (1)
- Rigour (2)
- Rubrics (2)
- SenseMaker (1)
- Stakeholder analysis (1)
- Strategy testing (1)
- Surveys (2)
- Sustainability (1)
- Systemic Change (10)
- Systems Mapping (4)
- Theory-based evaluations (2)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (8)
- Value for Money (2)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (2)
-
Practical
(39)
- Tools (2)
Resource type
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(1)
-
Between 1990 and 1999
(1)
- 1998 (1)
-
Between 1990 and 1999
(1)
-
Between 2000 and 2024
(280)
- Between 2000 and 2009 (6)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (182)
- Between 2020 and 2024 (91)
-
Between 2030 and 2024
(1)
- 2034 (1)