Your search
Results 101 resources
-
SAVI as a programme does not directly work with state governments – but we work in close conjunction with sister programmes who are supporting state governments on governance and sector reforms. SAVI supports non-government and SHoA partners to play their part in promoting more responsive, inclusive and accountable state governance delivering better services for citizens....
-
SAVI, a DFID funded programme implemented by Palladium, is an adaptive programme putting learning and adaptation at the centre of all decision-making. In relation to management and staffing SAVI has established the following approaches to facilitate this: – An adaptive approach to programme management: Full time strategic technical leadership, that works closely with and complements...
-
SAVI, is seeking to support processes of citizen engagement in governance in ways that are effective in influencing reform, and that are able to take on a life of their own without continuing donor support. SAVI is also an adaptive programme, putting learning and adaptation at the centre of all decision-making. Money is used and...
-
SAVI has established its own framework for assessing Value for Money in annual performance – in relation to expenditure, economy, efficiency, effectiveness and equity. Routine tracking and analysis of expenditure and economy ensure that inputs are supplied and services delivered to partners in line with SAVI’s core values, whilst also meeting DFID requirements and competing...
-
SAVI, a DFID funded programme implemented by Palladium, is an adaptive programme, aiming to put learning and adaptation at the centre of all decision-making. Learning and adaptation takes place in SAVI at three levels: the work of partners; the work of SAVI delivery teams; and the enabling environment of the programme as a whole. Achieving...
-
In May 2016, SAVI transitioned into a successor programme – the ‘Engaged Citizens Pillar’ (ECP) of a wider DFID-funded governance reform programme ‘The Partnership to Engage, Reform and Learn’ (PERL). ECP is managed by the same service provider, Palladium, and the same core management team as SAVI, and many of the SAVI front line staff...
-
SAVI supports citizen engagement in governance through a facilitated partnership approach, in contrast to the usual approach of grants to civil society organisations (CSOs). The overall aim is to facilitate and support working relationships and processes of reform that are home-grown, self-sustaining and, after initial engagement, not dependent on external support. Our way of working...
-
SAVI’s theory of change is a simple, practical guide that staff and partners use to plan and to monitor change – as well as to reflect on and enhance their own effectiveness. It sets out broad stages of attitude and behaviour change over time to facilitate effective citizen engagement in governance processes, systems and structures....
-
Thinking and acting politically is central to the SAVI programme. We support staff and partners to analyse the power relations that shape change in their state, and to use this knowledge to inform their decision-making. This includes decisions made by SAVI state teams relating to the issues and partners they engage with and support, and...
-
SAVI aims to facilitate replicable and sustainable processes of citizen engagement in governance. The programme in each state is locally defined, flexible and adaptive, and results are not predictable in advance. Standardised monitoring tools are not applicable, and consequently we have evolved our tools and frameworks during the programme through processes of learning by doing....
-
SAVI state teams provide support to CS groups to become more effective agents of citizens’ voice and public accountability, through a variety of mutually reinforcing interventions. These include: hands-on support to demonstration civil society Advocacy Partnerships (APs) facilitating working partnerships between civil society APs, SHoAs, and the media brokering working relationships between all of these...
-
We promote attention to gender equality and social inclusion in all of our engagement with CS groups, the media and SHoAs, and in all of the issues and processes they work on. In all the states we work in, we also support partners to focus on some issues and form some partnerships and networks which...
-
The overall aim of SAVI engagement with the media is for media representation of citizens’ interests to become normal, and play its part in helping state governments to be more responsive, inclusive and accountable to their citizens. Media partners – individual media personnel and selected media houses – are supported to be more effective agents...
-
The overall aim of SAVI engagement with SHoAs is to promote lasting reforms that are not dependent on external funding and which promote an increasingly more responsive and accountable relationship between Nigerian state governments and their citizens. SHoAs are supported to be more effective agents of citizen voice and public accountability, demanding better performance from...
-
We are piloting a new approach to identifying and supporting our partners. This breaks with convention in many ways in order to improve impact. Our approach is summarized in the Introduction to SAVI’s way of working. We have broken our approach down into key components – depicted in the form of our ‘knowledge tree’ –...
-
This paper examines adaptive approaches to aid programming in Nigeria. Through field research and desk reviews, we have investigated some of the assertions around the ‘adaptive management and programming’ approach, which has arisen in recent years as a response to critiques of overly rigid, pre-designed, blueprint and linear project plans. This is the second of three case studies in a series which explore if and how adaptive approaches, including rapid learning and planning responses, are...
-
This Flagship report analyses 20 years of governance programmes in Nigeria funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID) and the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) in the North-western states of Jigawa (since 2001), Kano (since 2005) and Kaduna (since 2006), as well as the North-eastern state of Yobe (since 2011). The report’s main research question is whether, how, under what conditions and for whom UK-funded state-level governance programmes in Nigeria...
-
On 18 December 2013, the Indonesian House of Representatives passed the new Village Law, a vote that was the culmination of a journey that had started in 2007. This Story of Change takes the passing of the Village Law as its starting point and describes the relative influence that research-based evidence, produced by the Institute for Research and Empowerment (IRE), has had at critical junctions of the legislative process. This Story of Change concludes that good quality, research-based...
-
Development assistance programmes that start from careful analysis of what works and what does not in country contexts are still remarkably rare. One reason for this is the lack of well documented examples of ‘politically’ smart aid programming. To this end, this film outlines the experience of the State Accountability and Voice Initiative (SAVI), a DFID-funded programme in Nigeria providing support to civil society, media and governmental organisations.
Explore
Theme
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
- Adaptive Learning (6)
- Adaptive Management (67)
- Capacity WORKS (1)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (3)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (1)
- Other Adaptive approaches (1)
-
Other sectors
(2)
- Project management (1)
- Sport (1)
- Participation (2)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (3)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (2)
- Results Based Management (9)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (7)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (15)
- Cases
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(35)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- Canada - GAC & IDRC (1)
- China (3)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (13)
- GIZ (Germany) (2)
- Hivos - Netherlands (1)
- IFAD (1)
- Irish Aid (1)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- New Zealand (1)
- NGO Perspectives (1)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (9)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (1)
- SDC - Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (1)
- SIDA - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (2)
- USAID (5)
- WFP (1)
- World Bank (4)
-
Geography
(79)
-
Africa
(53)
-
Central Africa
(4)
- Angola (1)
- Cameroon (1)
- Democratic Republic of the Congo (2)
-
Eastern Africa
(17)
- Ethiopia (1)
- Kenya (3)
- Malawi (1)
- Mozambique (3)
- Rwanda (2)
- Somalia (2)
- Somaliland (1)
- South Sudan (1)
- Tanzania (2)
- Uganda (5)
- Zambia (1)
- Zimbabwe (4)
- Northern Africa (1)
-
Southern Africa
(3)
- South Africa (3)
-
West Africa
(38)
- Liberia (2)
- Nigeria (32)
- Senegal (1)
- Sierra Leone (3)
-
Central Africa
(4)
-
Americas
(5)
-
Central America
(3)
- Costa Rica (1)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (1)
-
North America
(2)
- Canada (2)
- United States of America (1)
- South America (2)
-
Central America
(3)
-
Asia
(25)
-
Eastern Asia
(2)
- China (2)
-
South-eastern Asia
(10)
- Cambodia (3)
- Indonesia (1)
- Lao People's Democratic Republic (2)
- Myanmar (5)
- Viet Nam (2)
-
Southern Asia
(10)
- Afghanistan (1)
- Bangladesh (4)
- India (2)
- Nepal (6)
- Pakistan (3)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Eastern Asia
(2)
-
Europe
(4)
-
Eastern Europe
(1)
- Ukraine (1)
-
Northern Europe
(1)
- United Kingdom (1)
-
Western Europe
(3)
- France (1)
- Netherlands (1)
- Switzerland (1)
-
Eastern Europe
(1)
- Many geographies (2)
-
Oceania
(3)
- Australia and New Zealand (1)
-
Melanesia
(2)
- Papua New Guinea (1)
-
Africa
(53)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(26)
- After Action Reviews (2)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Contribution Analysis (2)
- Cost-Benefit Analysis (1)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Delphi Survey (1)
- Ex-post Evaluation (1)
- Focus Group Discussions (1)
- Impact evaluation (1)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (1)
- Innovation System Analysis (1)
- Logical Framework (1)
- MEL in International Development (2)
- Outcome Harvesting (1)
- Outcome Mapping (1)
- Participatory Action Research (4)
- Participatory Evaluation (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (1)
- Power Analysis (1)
- Process Tracing (1)
- Realist Evaluation (1)
- Strategy testing (1)
- SWOT Analysis (1)
- Systemic Change (1)
- Systems Mapping (1)
- Theory-based evaluations (1)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (1)
- Trans-disciplinary Research (1)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (1)
- Value for Money (2)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (1)
-
Practical
(11)
- Tools (2)
-
Sectors [+]
(42)
- Advocacy and Activism (1)
- Agriculture (3)
- Alternative Development (2)
- Children (3)
- Citizen Engagement (1)
- Combatting violent extremism (1)
- Economic development (5)
- Education (1)
- Environmental Management (1)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (7)
- Gender (5)
- Governance and Accountability (12)
- Health (2)
- Innovation (in Development) (1)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (1)
- Institutional Reform (1)
- Knowledge to Practice (1)
- Land Reform (1)
- NGOs (1)
- Peace Building (4)
- Research for Development (R4D) (1)
- Rural development (1)
- Scaling up / Propagating (2)
- Social Accountability (5)
- Waste Management (1)
Resource type
- Book (3)
- Book Section (2)
- Conference Paper (1)
- Journal Article (11)
- Report (81)
- Thesis (1)
- Video Recording (1)
- Web Page (1)
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(1)
-
Between 1980 and 1989
(1)
- 1989 (1)
-
Between 1980 and 1989
(1)
- Between 2000 and 2024 (100)