Your search
Results 6 resources
-
Over the last decade, the peace sector has been developing and adapting Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) systems and tools to fit their contexts and ways of working. This evolution may hold some insights for the aid community in how to go beyond more traditional, backwards-looking M&E to navigate today’s volatile, interest-based world of politics and aid.
-
This updated guide provides practical guidance to practitioners in the human rights sector and beyond on how to integrate Applied Political Economy Analysis
-
The world changes too much for anyone who is invested in social change work to imagine that this work is linear and predictable. Opportunities come and go, whether caused by a pandemic or political shifts. This much most social movement leaders and activists intuitively understand. But what can be done with this realization? How might movement groups better prepare for moments of opportunity? We want to explore how we can create the changes we want to see by responding to the changes that are outside our control.
-
The conversation on adaptive management has grown fast amongst development actors. These conversations often focus on designing, commissioning, and managing large-scale development programmes. Exactly how this impacts the frontline, the implementers, and day-to-day project delivery is still being debated. Yet, perspectives drawn directly from practice are often largely missing within these debates. This paper is written by two development practitioners. Through this paper, we reflect on the...
-
How can we measure and learn when promoting systems change? It’s a challenge that has inspired Laudes Foundation to develop a rubrics-based methodology to help us, our partners and the wider field of philanthropy, understand our contribution to change, while learning and adapting to new and unforeseen circumstances. Change cannot be captured by numbers alone because metrics put the focus on what can be counted, not always what’s most important. Rubrics are a framework that set a standard...
-
Audience This guidance is primarily aimed at development and humanitarian professionals who design or manage monitoring and evaluation processes to support design and implementation of qualitative monitoring using Most Significant Change (MSC), Outcome Harvesting (OH), or Outcome Mapping (OM), which are participatory, outcome-focused qualitative methods. Purpose This guidance is a resource to strengthen qualitative monitoring, specifically addressing commonplace gaps or weakness in the...
Explore
Theme
- Development Actors Perspectives
- Adaptive Approaches [+] (4)
-
Geography
(2)
-
Africa
(1)
-
West Africa
(1)
- Niger (1)
-
West Africa
(1)
-
Asia
(2)
-
South-eastern Asia
(1)
- Myanmar (1)
-
Southern Asia
(1)
- Bangladesh (1)
-
South-eastern Asia
(1)
-
Africa
(1)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(4)
- Most Significant Change (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (1)
- Outcome Mapping (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (1)
- Rubrics (1)
- Scenario Planning (1)
- Systemic Change (1)
-
Practical
(3)
- Tools (1)
- Sectors [+] (2)
Resource type
- Blog Post (1)
- Magazine Article (1)
- Report (4)