Your search
Results 30 resources
-
LASER synthesis papers aim to help donors and other stakeholders better understand why and how to approach investment climate reform programming differently. The papers reflect emerging best practice and lessons learnt on what works and what does not work in doing development differently. The papers have been peer-reviewed by experts in the field including senior advisers at DFID, World Bank, IFC and the Donor Committee for Enterprise Development (amongst others).
-
In order to help enhance the effectiveness of donors and development practitioners on the ground, LASER has produced a range of practical guidance and tools. These are primarily intended for the international development community engaged in designing and implementing investment climate programmes, though can also be used more widely by other stakeholders across sectors. General guidance and tools: Politically smart approaches to donor investment climate programming (and annexes) Revised...
-
In order to help enhance the effectiveness of donors and development practitioners on the ground, LASER has produced a range of practical guidance and tools. These are primarily intended for the international development community engaged in designing and implementing investment climate programmes, though can also be used more widely by other stakeholders across sectors. General guidance and tools: Monday morning in Kigali January 2016 - what do you do when you get off the plane? Practical guidance for PDIA practitioners
-
This case study describes how LASER has gone about enabling systemic change and sustainable uptake of reforms that address complex institutional problems in Kenya, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somaliland and Uganda. In each of these countries LASER has designed-in a sustainable approach from the start based on: (i) local ownership and leadership of reforms based on developing country (rather than donor) priorities; (ii) use of country (rather than donor programme) systems; and (iii) an...
-
Politics has become a central concern in development discourse, and yet the use of political analysis as a means for greater aid effectiveness remains limited and contested within development agencies. This article uses qualitative data from two governance “leaders” – the United Kingdom Department for International Development and the World Bank – to analyze the administrative hurdles facing the institutionalization of political analysis in aid bureaucracies. We find that programing,...
-
UK aid, at its best, makes a real and positive difference to the lives and livelihoods of poor people around the world. Ensuring the best possible performance across a large and multifaceted aid programme is, however, a complex management challenge. This report reviews ICAI’s previous 44 reports and looks at how well DFID ensures positive, long-term, transformative impact across its work.
-
LASER synthesis papers aim to help donors and other stakeholders better understand why and how to approach investment climate reform programming differently. The papers reflect emerging best practice and lessons learnt on what works and what does not work in doing development differently. The papers have been peer-reviewed by experts in the field including senior advisers at DFID, World Bank, IFC and the Donor Committee for Enterprise Development (amongst others). First synthesis paper -...
-
Excellent learning is essential for UK aid to achieve maximum impact and value for money. We take learning to mean the extent to which DFID uses information and experience to influence its decisions. Each ICAI review assesses how well learning takes place. Our reports to date indicate a mixed performance. This review seeks to identify the way DFID learns and what inhibits it from doing so consistently. We drew on our reviews, assessed data from DFID’s own surveys and carried out interviews...
-
Staff blogs from the UK Department for International Development. Get real-life perspectives from those on the ground to fight poverty and join in the debate.
-
Political economy analysis is a powerful tool for improving the effectiveness of aid. Bridging the traditional concerns of politics and economics, it focuses on how power and resources are distributed and contested in different contexts, and the implications for development outcomes. It gets beneath the formal structures to reveal the underlying interests, incentives and institutions that enable or frustrate change. Such insights are important if we are to advance challenging agendas around...
Explore
Theme
- Adaptive Approaches [+]
- Development Actors Perspectives
- Cases (13)
-
Geography
(6)
-
Africa
(4)
-
Eastern Africa
(2)
- Kenya (1)
- Mozambique (1)
- Rwanda (1)
- Somaliland (1)
- Tanzania (1)
- Uganda (1)
-
West Africa
(3)
- Nigeria (2)
- Sierra Leone (1)
-
Eastern Africa
(2)
-
Asia
(2)
-
South-eastern Asia
(1)
- Myanmar (1)
-
Southern Asia
(2)
- Bangladesh (2)
- Nepal (1)
-
South-eastern Asia
(1)
-
Europe
(1)
-
Northern Europe
(1)
- United Kingdom (1)
-
Northern Europe
(1)
-
Africa
(4)
- MEL4 Adaptive Management (8)
- Practical (6)
-
Sectors [+]
(8)
- Alternative Development (2)
- Children (1)
- Economic development (1)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (1)
- Gender (1)
- Governance and Accountability (1)
- Innovation (in Development) (1)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (1)
- Knowledge to Practice (1)
- NGOs (1)
- Scaling up / Propagating (1)
- Social Accountability (1)
Resource type
- Blog Post (2)
- Journal Article (1)
- Report (27)
Publication year
-
Between 2000 and 2024
(30)
-
Between 2000 and 2009
(1)
- 2009 (1)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (21)
- Between 2020 and 2024 (8)
-
Between 2000 and 2009
(1)