Your search
Results 9 resources
-
The growing interest in systems-change initiatives sits alongside increasing pressure to demonstrate value for money (VFM), which is challenging for emergent, interconnected and often intangible work. A new way to assess the VFM of systems-change work involves considering the value of changing system conditions and the creation of potential value for future systems transformation. This innovation combines the Water of Systems Change framework with the Cycles of Value Creation to create five...
-
Evaluation has a long history of using experimental and quasi-experimental designs to measure the effects of programs and strategies, and through this, to infer causality. Yet, these approaches are often not appropriate when evaluating change in complex, dynamic systems. Further, programs and strategies that seek to produce change in complex settings are increasingly common. This leads to an evaluation dilemma: if and how do evaluators attend to causality amid complexity? Too often, the...
-
Social change takes time, and it is never a linear process. It also happens within an ecosystem, and rarely comes down to a single grantee partner or foundation. If we […]
-
Pressure is mounting on international development cooperation agencies to prove the impact of their work. Private and public commissioners as well as the general public are increasingly asking for robust evidence of impact. In this context, rigorous impact evaluation (RIE) methods are increasingly receiving attention within the broader German development system and in GIZ. Compared to other implementing agencies such as DFID or USAid, the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale...
-
Rigorous Impact Evaluation in GIZ Governance Programmes (How-To-Note)von Schiller, A. - 2020 - Bonn
Why should I integrate an impact assessment in my programme? How will the programme benefit from it? Are the benefits worth the effort and expenses? How do I design and implement it in detail? Who is addressable for support? What should I pay attention to in order to get the most out of it? This note is meant to answer these questions. It addresses leaders and project staff of governance programmes who are interested in using this tool within their specific governance programme or project....
-
This briefing note looks at how the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Wildlife Asia programme has operationalised the concepts of adaptive rigour and adaptive management as part of its approach to collaborating, learning and adapting. As described by the Global Learning for Adaptive Management (GLAM) initiative, adaptive rigour is about ensuring that the data, information, methods, processes and systems that underpin adaptive management are robust, systematic and...
Explore
Theme
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
- Rigour
- Case Study (1)
- Causal mapping, pahtways, mechanisms (3)
- Contribution Analysis (1)
- Democratic Evaluation (1)
- Impact evaluation (2)
- MEL Bricolage (1)
- MEL in International Development (2)
- Outcome Harvesting (1)
- Outcome Mapping (1)
- Participatory Approaches and Evaluation (2)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (1)
- Realist Evaluation (1)
- Rubrics (1)
- Systemic Change (2)
- Trust-based evaluation (/philanthropy /learning) (1)
- Value for Investment (1)
- Value for Money (1)
- Adaptive Approaches [+] (3)
- Cases (2)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(2)
- GIZ (Germany) (2)
-
Geography
(2)
-
Africa
(1)
-
Eastern Africa
(1)
- Malawi (1)
- Mozambique (1)
-
West Africa
(1)
- Benim (1)
-
Eastern Africa
(1)
-
Americas
(1)
-
South America
(1)
- Peru (1)
-
South America
(1)
-
Asia
(2)
-
Southern Asia
(1)
- Pakistan (1)
-
Southern Asia
(1)
-
Africa
(1)
- Sectors [+] (2)
Resource type
- Blog Post (1)
- Book Section (1)
- Journal Article (3)
- Report (4)