Your search
Results 609 resources
-
There is a growing emphasis among NGOs and donors on ensuring that the voices of beneficiaries are heard. A range of beneficiary feedback mechanisms (BFMs) exist which enable beneficiary perspectives and suggestions to be gathered and used within an M&E system. BFMs are tools designed to enable a continuous cycle of interaction between those receiving and those delivering aid-funded interventions.
-
This guidance seeks to ensure that UK Aid Direct applicants and grant holders understand what the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) means by beneficiary feedback mechanisms, and more specifically, that they: • Understand the terms used that relate to beneficiary feedback mechanisms in UK Aid Direct guidance and templates • Understand beneficiary feedback mechanisms and why they are a useful tool for project monitoring and learning • Learn how to use beneficiary feedback...
-
Theory of Change (ToC) is an emerging methodology in the practice of development programmes, often contrasted with the dominant logical framework. This article reviews current debates around ToC before identifying five aspects that are appreciated in practice. It appears that these aspects mostly cover areas where the logical framework is not – or is no longer – meeting the needs of practitioners. Subsequently, the article analyses experiences in ToC training for NGO staff and concludes that...
-
Over the last decades, the Logical Framework Approach (LFA) has become universally known and has assumed a key role for planning and managing development interventions. LFA, however, is not uncontroversial and the approach has been subject to criticism, concerning both its theoretical foundations and practical use. Despite these criticisms LFA’s position has not been fundamentally weakened and while many donors acknowledge its limits and weaknesses, they maintain (some would say impose) its...
-
The logical framework, otherwise known as a logframe, is a commonly used planning tool. Initially designed for use within simple projects, it is increasingly being applied to complex programmes and organisations. In these cases the logical framework has limitations. There are several options that can help overcome these limitations. These include expanding the logframe, and using multiple logframes.
-
How do we move from identifying ethical principles to enhancing development practice? How can donors and NGOs move beyond the reporting of technical outputs to explore less tangible aspects of their health projects: contributions to rebuilding trust, promoting social cohesion, and enhancing good governance at community level? This article considers these questions in relation to health and peace-building activities in conflicted settings. It describes difficulties facing practitioners and...
-
Although the decisions of policy professionals are often more consequential than those of individuals in their private capacity, there is a dearth of studies on the biases of policy professionals: those who prepare and implement policy on behalf of elected politicians. Experiments conducted on a novel subject pool of development policy professionals (public servants of the World Bank and the Department for International Development in the UK) show that policy professionals are indeed subject...
-
This paper probes trends in the use of big data by a community of early adopters working in monitoring, evaluation, research, and learning (MERL) in the development and humanitarian sectors. Qualitative analysis was conducted on data from MERL Tech conference records and key informant interviews. Findings indicate that MERL practitioners are in a fragmented, experimental phase, with use and application of big data varying widely, accompanied by shifting terminologies. We take an in-depth...
-
The Biodiversity How-To Guide 2: Using Results Chains to Depict Theories of Change in USAID Biodiversity Programming is the second in a series of three guides that provide in-depth guidance on key tools and practices to support design teams as they design and manage biodiversity programs within the Program Cycle and in accordance with the USAID Biodiversity Policy. It builds off the situation model guide to help design teams clearly state the expected results and assumptions behind the...
-
We think we’re good at determining causality, but we suck at it One of the great challenges in evaluation is determining whether the results we’re seeing are because of the program we’re evaluating, some other influences out there in the big world, or random chance. At one level, this is an everyday, common sense task. As a species we’ve been making judgments about causation for a million years or so. Unfortunately, though, the way we are wired does not predispose us to logical thinking. We...
-
This paper looks at a range of M&E innovations that are designed specifically to provide input to ongoing iterative decision-making and learning at the project level. It identifies three key areas for potential innovation: 1) timing of M&E data provision; 2) flexibility of M&E frameworks to evolve with programme change; and 3) approaches to integrate diverse perspectives on project implementation in a meaningful way. It then looks at a collection of approaches currently being used in each of...
-
This paper lays out a series of steps people can take to create the new systems we need to meet shared, public challenges. Systems are ubiquitous and powerful. We rely on them to support our daily lives: every time we turn on a tap, flick a switch for electricity, drop our child at school, jump on a bus or visit a doctor we rely on a wider system. There is a widespread sense, among decision makers and citizens that in the coming decades society will need not just new products, software and...
-
Building on experience from the CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems implemented by WorldFish in the Visayas and Mindanao regions of the Philippines, known as the VisMin Hub, we describe the development and evolution of a monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system emerging from the facilitated action-reflection cycles of testing and adopting theories of change carried out with community partners through participatory action research (PAR). The former guides our community...
-
There are numerous ways in which to model the underlying theory of programs. In the context of international development evaluation, the most ubiquitous are likely “logframes” and to some extent “theories of change,” both of which may serve to guide program development and management, monitoring, and evaluation. While logframes and theories of change are often developed in parallel, they are rarely fully integrated in their practical application. Drawing on lessons from a recent theory-based...
-
Doing development differently rests on deliberate efforts to reflect and learn, not just about what programmes are doing and achieving, but about how they are working. This is particularly important for an action research programme like Child Labour: Action- Research-Innovation in South and South-Eastern Asia (CLARISSA), which is implemented by a consortium of organisations from across the research and development spectrum, during a rapidly changing global pandemic. Harnessing the potential...
Explore
Theme
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (8)
- After Action Reviews (8)
- Appreciative Inquiry (7)
- Artificial Intelligence (4)
- Beneficiary Assessment/Engagement (8)
- Capacity Development (2)
- Case Study (11)
- Causal Mechanisms (14)
- Circular charts applications (radar, pie, sunburst, spiderweb, orbic, etc) (7)
- Comparisons/Benchmarking (1)
- Context Monitoring (1)
- Contribution Analysis (12)
- Cost-Benefit Analysis (3)
- Cost-effectiveness analysis (1)
- Critical Friends (3)
- Critical Systems Heuristics (7)
- Cross-sectional study (1)
- Data mining (1)
- Delphi Survey (1)
- Democratic Evaluation (3)
- Descriptive Statistics (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (3)
- Developmental Evaluation (14)
- Diaries (1)
- Empowerment Evaluation (5)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (5)
- Evaluability assessment (6)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (6)
- Ex-post Evaluation (5)
- Feedback Systems (5)
- Focus Group Discussions (3)
- Horizontal Evaluation (2)
- Humour (1)
- Impact evaluation (15)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (5)
- Indicator-based approaches (11)
- Innovation History (3)
- Innovation System Analysis (4)
- Institutional Histories (4)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (11)
- Logical Framework (16)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (11)
- MEL Bricolage (2)
- MEL in International Development (31)
- Most Significant Change (7)
- Narrative Based Approaches (2)
- Network Analysis (8)
- Objectives and options analysis (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (12)
- Outcome Mapping (31)
- Participatory Action Research (19)
- Participatory Evaluation (25)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (12)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (8)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (4)
- Policy Scientific Approach (2)
- Political Economy Analysis (14)
- Political Sentiment Analysis (PSA) (1)
- Portfolio Management (17)
- Positive Deviance (7)
- Post Project Evaluations (1)
- Power Analysis (1)
- Principles-Focused Evaluation (1)
- Process Tracing (12)
- Public Management Theory (2)
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (8)
- Qualitative data analysis and grounded theory (2)
- Qualitative Impact Assessment Protocol (4)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (14)
- Realist Evaluation (12)
- Remote Monitoring (1)
- Rigour (6)
- Rubrics (16)
- Rules of Thumb (3)
- Scenario Planning (9)
- SenseMaker (9)
- Social Media Metrics (1)
- Social Return on Investment (4)
- Stakeholder analysis (3)
- Stakeholder Feedback (3)
- Strategy testing (2)
- Success Case Method (5)
- Surveys (4)
- Sustainability (4)
- SWOT Analysis (1)
- Systemic Change (31)
- Systems Mapping (10)
- Tech 4 MEL (4)
- Theory-based evaluations (12)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (62)
- Trans-disciplinary Research (1)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (8)
- Value for Investment (4)
- Value for Money (9)
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(176)
- Adaptive Learning (29)
- Adaptive Management (63)
- Adaptive Rigour (4)
- Agile & Lean approaches (4)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (12)
- Design Thinking / HCD (2)
- Doing Development Differently (2)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (10)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (1)
- Other Adaptive approaches (3)
- Other sectors (7)
- Participation (6)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (2)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (9)
- Positive Deviance & 2 loops model (1)
- Results Based Management (4)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (54)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (11)
- Cases (48)
- Courses (2)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(65)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- Canada - GAC & IDRC (1)
- China (2)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (12)
- G7 (1)
- GIZ (Germany) (7)
- Hivos - Netherlands (1)
- Irish Aid (2)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- NGO Perspectives (16)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (5)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (2)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (2)
- SDC - Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (2)
- SIDA - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (3)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (5)
- USAID (11)
- World Bank (2)
-
Geography
(43)
-
Africa
(24)
-
Central Africa
(3)
- Angola (1)
- Cameroon (1)
- Democratic Republic of the Congo (1)
-
Eastern Africa
(17)
- Kenya (1)
- Malawi (2)
- Mozambique (6)
- Rwanda (2)
- Somalia (3)
- South Sudan (1)
- Tanzania (1)
- Uganda (3)
- Zambia (1)
- Zimbabwe (3)
- Northern Africa (2)
-
Southern Africa
(2)
- South Africa (2)
- West Africa (13)
-
Central Africa
(3)
-
Americas
(6)
-
Central America
(4)
- Ecuador (2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (3)
- South America (4)
-
Central America
(4)
-
Asia
(21)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
- China (1)
- South-eastern Asia (4)
-
Southern Asia
(13)
- Bangladesh (8)
- India (1)
- Nepal (7)
- Pakistan (3)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
-
Europe
(4)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
- Spain (1)
-
Western Europe
(3)
- Germany (3)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
-
Oceania
(1)
-
Melanesia
(1)
- Papua New Guinea (1)
-
Melanesia
(1)
-
Africa
(24)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (6)
-
Practical
(64)
- Tools (11)
-
Sectors [+]
(109)
- Advocacy and Activism (1)
- Agriculture (3)
- Alternative Development (15)
- Cash Trasfers (2)
- Children (8)
- Citizen Engagement (5)
- Climate Change (2)
- Combatting violent extremism (4)
- Economic development (9)
- Education (3)
- Employment (1)
- Environmental Management (1)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (8)
- Gender (3)
- Governance and Accountability (17)
- Health (4)
- Humanitarian Aid (4)
- Innovation (in Development) (5)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (1)
- Knowledge to Practice (10)
- Locally driven development (2)
- NGOs (4)
- Organizational Change (4)
- Peace Building (3)
- Private Sector Development (1)
- Research for Development (R4D) (4)
- Rural development (2)
- Scaling up / Propagating (4)
- Social Accountability (4)
- Social Protection (1)
- Waste Management (1)
Resource type
- Audio Recording (1)
- Blog Post (102)
- Book (44)
- Book Section (11)
- Conference Paper (3)
- Dataset (1)
- Document (11)
- Encyclopedia Article (1)
- Forum Post (1)
- Journal Article (97)
- Magazine Article (6)
- Manuscript (1)
- Newspaper Article (1)
- Presentation (7)
- Radio Broadcast (1)
- Report (288)
- Software (1)
- Thesis (2)
- Video Recording (13)
- Web Page (17)
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(18)
-
Between 1960 and 1969
(1)
- 1965 (1)
- Between 1970 and 1979 (2)
-
Between 1980 and 1989
(1)
- 1989 (1)
- Between 1990 and 1999 (14)
-
Between 1960 and 1969
(1)
-
Between 2000 and 2024
(569)
- Between 2000 and 2009 (61)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (311)
- Between 2020 and 2024 (197)
- Unknown (22)