Your search
Results 426 resources
-
- This short paper draws out lessons for working effectively with and through partners, based on the experience of the Institutions for Inclusive Development (I4ID) programme – an adaptive, politically smart governance programme in Tanzania. • Cultivating effective partnerships can be a key part of delivering locally legitimate projects that have the potential to create sustainable change. Adaptive and politically informed ways of working create specific opportunities and challenges for...
-
• This paper looks critically at the approach to value for money (VfM) in the Institutions for Inclusive Development (I4ID) programme – an adaptive, politically smart governance programme in Tanzania. • Adaptive, politically smart programmes like I4ID aim to deliver VfM by learning about what will work in complex environments, and quickly incorporating those lessons into delivery. When functioning properly, they can rapidly wind down activities as new information emerges and divert funding...
-
The LEARN contract and the United States Agency for International Development/Bureau of Policy, Planning, and Learning (USAID/PPL) are managing an area of work known as the Evidence Base for Collaborating, Learning, and Adapting (EB4CLA). The purpose of this work is to answer the following key learning questions: ● Does an intentional, systematic, and resourced approach to collaborating, learning, and adapting (CLA) contribute to organizational effectiveness and/or development outcomes? ●...
-
USAID’s Bureau for Policy, Planning and Learning and its LEARN support contract are working to integrate systematic, intentional and resourced collaborating, learning and adapting (CLA) throughout program planning and implementation to achieve more effective development programs. As part of this effort, USAID is exploring several approaches to understand whether and how strategic collaboration, continuous learning and adaptive management make a difference to organizational effectiveness and...
-
This paper proposes that pastoralist systems are better treated, in aggregate, as a global critical infrastructure. The policy and management implications that follow are significant and differ importantly from current pastoralist policies and recommendations. A multi-typology framework is presented, identifying the conditions under which pastoralists can be considered real-time reliability professionals in systems with mandates preventing or otherwise avoiding key events from happening....
-
“Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better.” --Samuel Beckett Here’s my favorite part of that quote: the ultimate goal is not a lack of failure; it’s better failures. That’s good news for CARE, because we just published round two of our Learning From Failure initiative, and…I know this will surprise everyone…we haven’t stopped failures yet. We do have some hopeful signs that we’re failing better; or at least, that we’re improving on some concrete weaknesses we identified in...
-
Adaptive management approaches potentially offer us opportunities to deliver high quality results in circumstances where change is complex, including in fragile, unstable or conflict affected places. However, building adaptive programming continues to be a challenge for the sector. For CARE, our Department for International Development -UK Aid funded Girls’ Education Challenge (GEC) programming has provided useful learning on how to operationalise adaptive approaches. In this paper we expand...
-
Planning for and assessing system change is a strategic management issue. It is critical for everything from developing a strategy and designing interventions, to adapting strategy, improving implementation and reporting impact. But many programmes get stuck when it comes to assessing system change. The private sector development field has struggled to agree on an approach that programmes can implement and stakeholders can understand. However some mature programmes are starting to assess...
-
Planning for and assessing system change is a strategic management issue. It is critical for everything from developing a strategy and designing interventions, to adapting strategy, improving implementation and reporting impact. But many programmes get stuck when it comes to assessing system change. The private sector development field has struggled to agree on an approach that programmes can implement and stakeholders can understand. However some mature programmes are starting to assess...
-
Most people agree that monitoring and evaluation (M&E) should be used for both learning and accountability. However, there is no consensus about which one is more important. The debate matters as there is sometimes tension between the two purposes. In the past there has often been a disconnect between M&E and learning. Many M&E systems are primarily designed to enable accountability to donors.
-
This briefing note looks at how the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Wildlife Asia programme has operationalised the concepts of adaptive rigour and adaptive management as part of its approach to collaborating, learning and adapting. As described by the Global Learning for Adaptive Management (GLAM) initiative, adaptive rigour is about ensuring that the data, information, methods, processes and systems that underpin adaptive management are robust, systematic and...
-
This briefing note focuses on the remote collection and use of data for adaptive management during the Covid-19 pandemic, setting out key considerations to help practitioners think through a transition from more ‘traditional’ monitoring, evaluation and learning (MEL) to MEL for adaptive management (MEL4AM) that reflects the unique data collection challenges presented by Covid-19. The brief provides an overview of some key considerations in remote data collection, when this is required, and...
-
Based on consultations and stocktakings with LAC Missions, the LAC Bureau identified Mission Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) Specialists as influential decision makers regarding data and evidence use. The LAC Bureau aims to improve the quality and use of evidence for decision making, and ultimately to improve development outcomes.
-
CARE's Failing Forward initiative is sparking opportunities to showcase the ideas that don't work so we can spend more time implementing the ones that do. It's changing the conversation inside the organization, and leading to changes in the way we design and implement programs.
-
Adaptive Management involves a dynamic interaction between three elements: delivery, programming and governance. This case study focuses on a large DfID governance project, the Institutions for Inclusive Development (I4ID), a five-year initiative in Tanzania. The study forms part of a research project to examine whether and how adaptive approaches can strengthen aid projects promoting empowerment and accountability in fragile, conflict and violence-affected settings (FCVAS). The research...
-
Within DFID, there is now a commitment to more flexible and adaptive programming. This recognises that: • DFID works in contexts that continuously evolve and change, sometimes in unpredictable ways. To respond to this, the agency needs to remain flexible – to expect change and have a good understanding of context, with resources that can be adjusted and scope to change direction if needed. All DFID programmes should be able to do this. • Some DFID programmes aim to support change in...
Explore
Theme
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
- Adaptive Learning (43)
- Adaptive Management (175)
- Adaptive Rigour (4)
- Agile & Lean approaches (22)
- Capacity WORKS (3)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (27)
- Design Thinking / HCD (34)
- Doing Development Differently (12)
- Global Delivery Initiative (3)
- Human Learning Systems (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (12)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (4)
- Other Adaptive approaches (9)
-
Other sectors
(6)
- Government (1)
- Military (2)
- Organizational Management (2)
- Philosophical roots (1)
- Participation (4)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (15)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (18)
- Positive Deviance & 2 loops model (5)
- Results Based Management (11)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (76)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (47)
- Cases (81)
- Courses (7)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(101)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- Canada - GAC & IDRC (1)
- DANIDA - Danish International Development Agency (1)
- DCED - Donor Committee for Enterprise Development (2)
- DFAT (Australia) (4)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (27)
- GIZ (Germany) (7)
- Hivos - Netherlands (1)
- ILO (1)
- Irish Aid (1)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- New Zealand (1)
- NGO Perspectives (14)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (13)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (4)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (1)
- SDC - Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (1)
- SIDA - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (4)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (2)
- USAID (16)
- World Bank (9)
-
Geography
(77)
-
Africa
(53)
-
Central Africa
(3)
- Angola (1)
- Cameroon (1)
- Democratic Republic of the Congo (1)
-
Eastern Africa
(18)
- Ethiopia (1)
- Kenya (2)
- Malawi (1)
- Mozambique (5)
- Rwanda (2)
- Somalia (1)
- Somaliland (1)
- South Sudan (1)
- Tanzania (5)
- Uganda (3)
- Zambia (1)
- Zimbabwe (3)
- Northern Africa (1)
-
Southern Africa
(3)
- South Africa (3)
-
West Africa
(38)
- Liberia (2)
- Nigeria (31)
- Senegal (1)
- Sierra Leone (4)
-
Central Africa
(3)
-
Americas
(4)
-
Central America
(2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (1)
-
North America
(1)
- Canada (1)
- South America (3)
-
Central America
(2)
-
Asia
(22)
-
South-eastern Asia
(8)
- Cambodia (1)
- Indonesia (1)
- Myanmar (5)
- Philippines (1)
- Thailand (1)
- Timor Leste (1)
-
Southern Asia
(11)
- Afghanistan (1)
- Bangladesh (4)
- India (2)
- Nepal (7)
- Pakistan (4)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
South-eastern Asia
(8)
-
Europe
(4)
-
Northern Europe
(2)
- United Kingdom (2)
-
Western Europe
(2)
- Netherlands (1)
- Switzerland (1)
-
Northern Europe
(2)
- Many geographies (2)
-
Oceania
(3)
- Australia and New Zealand (2)
- Melanesia (1)
-
Africa
(53)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(110)
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (2)
- After Action Reviews (4)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Context Monitoring (1)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (1)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (3)
- Ex-post Evaluation (1)
- Impact evaluation (3)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (2)
- Indicator-based approaches (1)
- Innovation System Analysis (2)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (4)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (2)
- MEL Bricolage (1)
- MEL in International Development (6)
- Most Significant Change (1)
- Narrative Based Approaches (2)
- Network Analysis (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (2)
- Outcome Mapping (3)
- Participatory Action Research (6)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (2)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (2)
- Political Economy Analysis (8)
- Portfolio Management (8)
- Process Tracing (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (2)
- Realist Evaluation (1)
- Rubrics (2)
- Scenario Planning (1)
- SenseMaker (2)
- Stakeholder Feedback (1)
- Strategy testing (2)
- Surveys (1)
- Systemic Change (25)
- Systems Mapping (2)
- Theory-based evaluations (2)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (8)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (1)
- Value for Money (5)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (5)
-
Practical
(74)
- Tools (4)
-
Sectors [+]
(131)
- Advocacy and Activism (1)
- Agriculture (1)
- Alternative Development (18)
- Cash Trasfers (1)
- Children (3)
- Citizen Engagement (5)
- Climate Change (4)
- Economic development (9)
- Education (4)
- Environmental Management (5)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (7)
- Gender (7)
- Governance and Accountability (21)
- Health (2)
- Humanitarian Aid (5)
-
Innovation (in Development)
(12)
- Funding (1)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (11)
- Institutional Reform (4)
- Knowledge to Practice (5)
- Locally driven development (7)
- NGOs (15)
- Organizational Change (8)
- Pastoralism (1)
- Peace Building (4)
- Scaling up / Propagating (13)
- Social Accountability (13)
- Technology (in Development) (13)
- Waste Management (1)
Resource type
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(6)
-
Between 1980 and 1989
(1)
- 1989 (1)
- Between 1990 and 1999 (5)
-
Between 1980 and 1989
(1)
-
Between 2000 and 2024
(420)
- Between 2000 and 2009 (18)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (286)
- Between 2020 and 2024 (115)
-
Between 2030 and 2024
(1)
- 2034 (1)