Complexity, Adaptation, and Results
Resource type
Authors/contributors
- Barder, Owen (Author)
- Ramalingam, Ben (Author)
Title
Complexity, Adaptation, and Results
Abstract
In the last of a series of three blog posts looking at the implications of complexity theory for development, Owen Barder and Ben Ramalingam look at the implications of complexity for the trend towards results-based management in development cooperation. They argue that is a common mistake to see a contradiction between recognising complexity and focusing on results: on the contrary, complexity provides a powerful reason for pursuing the results agenda, but it has to be done in ways which reflect the context. In the 2012 Kapuscinski lecture Owen argued that economic and political systems can best be thought of as complex adaptive systems, and that development should be understood as an emergent property of those systems. As explained in detail in Ben’s forthcoming book, these interactive systems are made up of adaptive actors, whose actions are a self-organised search for fitness on a shifting landscape. Systems like this undergo change in dynamic, non-linear ways; characterised by explosive surprises and tipping points as well as periods of relative stability. If development arises from the interactions of a dynamic and unpredictable system, you might draw the conclusion that it makes no sense to try to assess or measure the results of particular development interventions. That would be the wrong conclusion to reach. While the complexity of development implies a different way of thinking about evaluation, accountability and results, it also means that the ‘results agenda’ is more important than ever.
Blog Title
Center For Global Development
Date
2012.07.09
Accessed
2017-04-07
Citation
Barder, O., & Ramalingam, B. (2012, July 9). Complexity, Adaptation, and Results. Center For Global Development. http://www.cgdev.org/blog/complexity-adaptation-and-results
Link to this record