Your search
Results 399 resources
-
In 2016, the Bureau of Policy, Planning and Learning (PPL) commissioned an internal stocktaking of USAID's mission-based MEL (Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning) Platforms.
-
What it takes to create smart velocity
-
Innovation teams must navigate inherent tensions between different learning activities to produce high levels of performance. Yet, we know little about how teams combine these activities—notably reflexive, experimental, vicarious, and contextual learning—most effectively over time. In this article, we integrate research on teamwork episodes with insights from music theory to develop a new theoretical perspective on team dynamics, which explains how team activities can produce harmony,...
-
Effective public service delivery begins with knowing whether the services offered are working as intended. We launched a system to enable citizen input on the delivery of public services.
-
Experiences, insights and practical advice from over 20 leading practitioners in innovation for international development, brought together in one collection.
-
Utilization-Focused Evaluation begins with the premise that evaluations should be judged by their utility and actual use; therefore, evaluators should facilitate the evaluation process and design any evaluation with careful consideration of how everything that is done, from beginning to end, will affect use. Use concerns how real people in the real world apply evaluation findings and experience and learn from the evaluation process. The checklist is based on Essentials of Utilization-Focused...
-
“Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better.” --Samuel Beckett Here’s my favorite part of that quote: the ultimate goal is not a lack of failure; it’s better failures. That’s good news for CARE, because we just published round two of our Learning From Failure initiative, and…I know this will surprise everyone…we haven’t stopped failures yet. We do have some hopeful signs that we’re failing better; or at least, that we’re improving on some concrete weaknesses we identified in...
-
"Outcome Mapping provides not only a guide to essential evaluation map-making, but also a guide to learning and increased effectiveness, and affirmation that being attentive along the journey is as important as, and critical to, arriving at a destination." - Michael Quinn PattonMore and more, development organizations are under pressure to demonstrate that their programs result in significant and lasting changes in the well-being of their intended beneficiaries. However, such "impacts" are...
-
The Thinking and Working Politically (TWP) Community of Practice (CoP) was established at a small meeting tacked on at the end of a meeting of Governance Advisers working for the United Kingdom’s Department of International Development (DFID) on South and South-East Asian countries, held in Delhi in November 2013. Since then, a number of meetings have been held throughout the world, each addressing different issues; ‘TWP’ has entered the lexicon of mainstream development; the CoP has...
-
What problem is the KRT model trying to solve? For workforces that experience continuous staff turnover, the lack of systematic knowledge transfer can often lead to: - Loss of programmatic momentum, - Duplication of efforts and frustration, and - Wasted time and resources. The Knowledge Retention and Transfer (KRT) model provides tools, processes, and practices to individuals, teams, offices, and organizations to improve knowledge handover, which in turn improves efficiency and programmatic and operational learning.
-
The Maturity Matrix is not a standalone tool. It is one of the three major components of the KRT Model. The Maturity Matrix is meant to be used in conjunction with the KRT Toolkit and Implementation Plan.
-
Data & research on evaluation of development programmes inc. paris declaration, budget support, multilateral effectiveness, impact evaluation, joint evaluations, governance, aid for trade
-
Based on a broad international consultative process, the DAC Quality Standards for Development Evaluation are a reference guide to good practice in development evaluation. With a view to improving the quality of evaluation processes and products, and facilitating collaboration, this reference guide lays out standards for each phase of a typical evaluation process: from defining purpose, to planning, designing, implementing, reporting, and learning from and using evaluation results.
Explore
Theme
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
- Adaptive/Emergent Learning (46)
- Adaptive Management (297)
- Adaptive Rigour (4)
- Agile & Lean approaches (14)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (24)
- Design Thinking / HCD / Appropriate tech (9)
- Doing Development Differently (11)
- Implementation Research (2)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (7)
- Other Adaptive approaches (14)
-
Other sectors
(34)
- Environmental (10)
- Logistics & Product Development (1)
- Military (2)
- Organizational Management (8)
- Project management (3)
- Software Development (12)
- Sport (1)
- Participation (2)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (13)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (5)
- Results Based Management (4)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (59)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (22)
-
Cases
(73)
- A4EA - Action for Empowerment and Accountability (3)
- LASER (8)
- PROSPECTS (3)
- SAVI (22)
- Courses (8)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(97)
- Adaptive Management orgs (1)
- Canada - GAC & IDRC (1)
- China (3)
- DANIDA - Danish International Development Agency (1)
- DCED - Donor Committee for Enterprise Development (2)
- Develpment Industry - Private Companies and ThinkTanks (4)
- DFAT (Australia) (2)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (24)
- GIZ (Germany) (5)
- ILO (1)
- Irish Aid (1)
- NGO/CSO Perspectives (22)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (4)
- SIDA - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (3)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (1)
- USAID (13)
- World Bank (9)
-
Geography
(64)
-
Africa
(51)
- Central Africa (5)
-
Eastern Africa
(20)
- Ethiopia (1)
- Kenya (2)
- Malawi (2)
- Mozambique (4)
- Rwanda (3)
- Somalia (2)
- Somaliland (1)
- South Sudan (1)
- Tanzania (6)
- Uganda (4)
- Zambia (2)
- Zimbabwe (4)
-
Northern Africa
(1)
- Sudan (1)
-
Southern Africa
(3)
- Lesotho (1)
- South Africa (1)
- Swaziland (1)
-
West Africa
(35)
- Liberia (3)
- Nigeria (28)
- Sierra Leone (4)
-
Americas
(1)
-
Central America
(1)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (1)
-
South America
(1)
- Colombia (1)
-
Central America
(1)
-
Asia
(18)
-
Eastern Asia
(2)
- China (2)
- South-eastern Asia (7)
-
Southern Asia
(8)
- Afghanistan (1)
- Bangladesh (4)
- India (1)
- Nepal (4)
- Pakistan (3)
-
Western Asia
(2)
- Israel (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Eastern Asia
(2)
-
Europe
(1)
-
Northern Europe
(1)
- United Kingdom (1)
-
Northern Europe
(1)
-
Africa
(51)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(112)
- After Action Reviews (4)
- Capacity Development (2)
- Context Monitoring (2)
- Contribution Analysis (3)
- Cost-Benefit Analysis (1)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Delphi Survey (1)
- Diaries/Journals/Logs (2)
- Emergent Learning (1)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (4)
- Focus Group Discussions (1)
- Future Thinking / Horizon Scanning / Scenario Planning (3)
- Impact evaluation (4)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (2)
- Indicator-based approaches (1)
- Innovation History (1)
- Innovation System Analysis (1)
- Institutional Histories (2)
- Knowledge Management (6)
- Logical Framework (1)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (1)
- MEL Bricolage (1)
- MEL in International Development (15)
- Most Significant Change (3)
- Narrative Based Approaches (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (4)
- Outcome Mapping (4)
- Participatory Action Research (2)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (1)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (4)
- Political Economy Analysis (2)
- Portfolio Approach & Management (10)
- Power Analysis (2)
- Process Tracing (3)
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (1)
- Realist Evaluation (3)
- Rigour (1)
- Rubrics (1)
-
Sense-making
(4)
- SenseMaker (2)
- Stakeholder Feedback (1)
- Strategy testing (3)
- SWOT Analysis (1)
- Systemic Change (11)
- Systems Mapping (2)
- Tech 4 MEL (1)
- Theory-based evaluations (3)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (9)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (3)
- Value for Money (5)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (10)
- Organizations (2)
-
Practical
(57)
- Tools (7)
-
Sectors [+]
(133)
- Advocacy and Activism (3)
- Agriculture (2)
- Alternative Development (35)
- Behavioural Change (3)
- Children (3)
- Citizen Engagement (4)
- Climate Change (1)
- Combatting violent extremism (1)
- Economic development (6)
- Education (3)
- Environmental Management (12)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (7)
- Gender (6)
- Governance and Accountability (19)
- Health (7)
- Humanitarian Aid (3)
- Innovation (in Development) (6)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (4)
- Institutional Reform (1)
- Knowledge to Practice (4)
- Locally driven development (3)
- NGOs (11)
- Organizational Change (6)
- Pastoralism (1)
- Peace Building (5)
- Philanthropy/Funding (1)
- Research for Development (R4D) (1)
- Rural development (2)
- Scaling up / Propagating (3)
- Social Accountability (12)
-
Technology (in Development)
(3)
- Appropriate Tech (1)
- Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) (1)
- Youth (1)
Resource type
- Blog Post (44)
- Book (37)
- Book Section (12)
- Conference Paper (1)
- Document (1)
- Forum Post (1)
- Journal Article (57)
- Magazine Article (5)
- Presentation (4)
- Radio Broadcast (1)
- Report (218)
- Software (1)
- Thesis (3)
- Video Recording (2)
- Web Page (12)
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(16)
-
Between 1950 and 1959
(1)
- 1958 (1)
-
Between 1960 and 1969
(1)
- 1967 (1)
-
Between 1970 and 1979
(1)
- 1978 (1)
- Between 1980 and 1989 (5)
- Between 1990 and 1999 (8)
-
Between 1950 and 1959
(1)
-
Between 2000 and 2026
(381)
- Between 2000 and 2009 (16)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (249)
- Between 2020 and 2026 (116)
- Unknown (2)