TY - JOUR TI - Monitoring and evaluation for thinking and working politically AU - Aston, Thomas AU - Roche, Chris AU - Schaaf, Marta AU - Cant, Sue T2 - Evaluation AB - This article explores the challenges of monitoring and evaluating politically informed and adaptive programmes in the international development field. We assess the strengths and weaknesses of some specific evaluation methodologies which have been suggested as particularly appropriate for these kinds of programmes based on scholarly literature and the practical experience of the authors in using them. We suggest that those methods which assume generative causality are particularly well suited to the task. We also conclude that factoring in the politics of uncertainty and evidence generation and use is particularly important in order to recognize and value diverse experiential knowledge, integrate understandings of the local context, accommodate adaptation and realistically grapple with the power relations which are inherent in evaluation processes. DA - 2022/01/01/ PY - 2022 DO - 10.1177/13563890211053028 DP - SAGE Journals VL - 28 IS - 1 SP - 36 EP - 57 J2 - Evaluation LA - en SN - 1356-3890 UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890211053028 Y2 - 2022/03/21/11:55:27 ER -